Parameter optimization of automated fiber placement based on CCD response surface method

IF 2.3 3区 材料科学 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES
Tianyao Lu, Junli Li, Yilian Zhang, Gang Liu, Bo Qian, Liqiang Zhang, Jian Mao
{"title":"Parameter optimization of automated fiber placement based on CCD response surface method","authors":"Tianyao Lu, Junli Li, Yilian Zhang, Gang Liu, Bo Qian, Liqiang Zhang, Jian Mao","doi":"10.1177/07316844241274274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Defects in the automatic fiber placement (AFP) directly affect the prepreg bonding strength, resulting in a less strong product than expected. Improper process parameter selection is one of the major factors contributing to layup defects. However, there is a significant degree of uncertainty associated with the parameters that affect the lay-up quality and currently few studies that use response surfaces to consider the interaction of these parameters. In general, it is necessary to obtain a more accurate combination of process parameters through experiment, which is time-consuming and consumable. Moreover, it is difficult to investigate the interrelation between process parameters. Therefore, this paper presents a method of placement parameter optimization based on lap shear strength (LSS) to achieve high-quality and high-strength AFP process control. Firstly, this article establishes a comprehensive quality evaluation system by analyzing the causes of defects in AFP process. Secondly, the central composite design of experiments (CCD) response surface methodology was used to effectively optimize the process parameters and to understand the interactions between the various factors. A prediction model with quadratic polynomial regression equations for four process parameters and laydown quality was developed. Based on the regression equations, the process parameters with optimal lay-up quality were obtained. Then, using 30 sets of process parameters from the response surface experiment, lap samples were made for tensile testing. The lap shear strength of tows under various process conditions was studied, and the experimental results were consistent with the response surface analysis results. Finally, by analyzing the quality evaluation curve and load-time curve, it was found that the trend of AFP quality evaluation score and LSS was practically the same. Data analysis shows that placement using optimized parameters corresponding to higher scoring samples has higher lap shear strength and fewer defects than placement of samples with low quality scores. Therefore, the quality evaluation system of lay-up quality proposed in this paper is an effective and reliable method for optimizing the parameters of AFP process.","PeriodicalId":16943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07316844241274274","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Defects in the automatic fiber placement (AFP) directly affect the prepreg bonding strength, resulting in a less strong product than expected. Improper process parameter selection is one of the major factors contributing to layup defects. However, there is a significant degree of uncertainty associated with the parameters that affect the lay-up quality and currently few studies that use response surfaces to consider the interaction of these parameters. In general, it is necessary to obtain a more accurate combination of process parameters through experiment, which is time-consuming and consumable. Moreover, it is difficult to investigate the interrelation between process parameters. Therefore, this paper presents a method of placement parameter optimization based on lap shear strength (LSS) to achieve high-quality and high-strength AFP process control. Firstly, this article establishes a comprehensive quality evaluation system by analyzing the causes of defects in AFP process. Secondly, the central composite design of experiments (CCD) response surface methodology was used to effectively optimize the process parameters and to understand the interactions between the various factors. A prediction model with quadratic polynomial regression equations for four process parameters and laydown quality was developed. Based on the regression equations, the process parameters with optimal lay-up quality were obtained. Then, using 30 sets of process parameters from the response surface experiment, lap samples were made for tensile testing. The lap shear strength of tows under various process conditions was studied, and the experimental results were consistent with the response surface analysis results. Finally, by analyzing the quality evaluation curve and load-time curve, it was found that the trend of AFP quality evaluation score and LSS was practically the same. Data analysis shows that placement using optimized parameters corresponding to higher scoring samples has higher lap shear strength and fewer defects than placement of samples with low quality scores. Therefore, the quality evaluation system of lay-up quality proposed in this paper is an effective and reliable method for optimizing the parameters of AFP process.
基于 CCD 响应面法的自动纤维铺放参数优化
自动纤维铺放 (AFP) 中的缺陷会直接影响预浸料的粘合强度,导致产品强度低于预期。工艺参数选择不当是造成铺层缺陷的主要因素之一。然而,影响铺层质量的参数具有很大程度的不确定性,目前很少有研究使用响应曲面来考虑这些参数的相互作用。一般来说,需要通过实验来获得更精确的工艺参数组合,这既耗时又耗材。此外,研究工艺参数之间的相互关系也很困难。因此,本文提出了一种基于搭接剪切强度(LSS)的贴片参数优化方法,以实现高质量、高强度的 AFP 过程控制。首先,本文通过分析 AFP 过程中产生缺陷的原因,建立了全面的质量评价体系。其次,采用中心复合实验设计(CCD)响应面方法有效优化工艺参数,并了解各因素之间的相互作用。针对四个工艺参数和铺层质量建立了二次多项式回归方程预测模型。根据回归方程,得到了具有最佳铺层质量的工艺参数。然后,利用响应面实验得出的 30 组工艺参数,制作搭接样品进行拉伸试验。研究了不同工艺条件下丝束的搭接剪切强度,实验结果与响应面分析结果一致。最后,通过分析质量评价曲线和载荷-时间曲线,发现 AFP 质量评价得分和 LSS 的变化趋势基本一致。数据分析显示,与质量得分低的样品相比,使用得分较高的样品对应的优化参数进行铺设,其搭接剪切强度更高,缺陷更少。因此,本文提出的铺层质量评价体系是优化 AFP 工艺参数的一种有效而可靠的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites
Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites 工程技术-材料科学:复合
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
82
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites is a fully peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles on a broad range of today''s reinforced plastics and composites including areas in: Constituent materials: matrix materials, reinforcements and coatings. Properties and performance: The results of testing, predictive models, and in-service evaluation of a wide range of materials are published, providing the reader with extensive properties data for reference. Analysis and design: Frequency reports on these subjects inform the reader of analytical techniques, design processes and the many design options available in materials composition. Processing and fabrication: There is increased interest among materials engineers in cost-effective processing. Applications: Reports on new materials R&D are often related to the service requirements of specific application areas, such as automotive, marine, construction and aviation. Reports on special topics are regularly included such as recycling, environmental effects, novel materials, computer-aided design, predictive modelling, and "smart" composite materials. "The articles in the Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Products are must reading for engineers in industry and for researchers working on leading edge problems" Professor Emeritus Stephen W Tsai National Sun Yat-sen University, Taiwan This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信