Maxime De Sousa, Aurélien Barrau, Killian Martineau
{"title":"Anomaly freedom in effective Loop Quantum Cosmology: pedagogical summary and generalized holonomy corrections","authors":"Maxime De Sousa, Aurélien Barrau, Killian Martineau","doi":"arxiv-2409.06441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The issue of consistency is crucial in quantum gravity. It has recently been\nintensively addressed for effective symmetry-reduced models. In this article,\nwe exhaustively study the anomaly freedom of effective loop quantum cosmology\nwith generalized holonomy corrections, considering loop correction of the\nconstraints at the perturbative order. We pedagogically explain why, although\nthe holonomy correction -- including the details of the chosen scheme --\napplied on the background part of the constraints is crucial, it becomes\nirrelevant when implemented on perturbative expansions, in the sense that all\nconsequences are \"absorbed\" in the counter-terms used for the regularization.\nThe possibility of closing the algebra of constraints without counter-terms is\nalso studied. It is argued that, although enforcing a first-class algebra is a\nstrong requirement, this can be achieved in several different ways, often\noverlooked, which generates ambiguities on the restriction of the form of the\ngeneralized holonomy correction. Those ambiguities are examined in details,\nleading to the conclusion that the consistency of the effective theory for\ncosmological perturbations, especially when considering scalar modes, cannot be\nachieved without counter-terms. We also take the opportunity of this work to\nclarify, as much as possible, all the required steps so that future works have\na clear material at disposal. In particular, a highly detailed calculation of\nall the brackets is provided, emphasizing the (usually implicit) assumptions,\nhypotheses and manipulations required to ensure the closure of the algebra.\nProspects for future works are underlined.","PeriodicalId":501339,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - High Energy Physics - Theory","volume":"122 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - High Energy Physics - Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.06441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The issue of consistency is crucial in quantum gravity. It has recently been
intensively addressed for effective symmetry-reduced models. In this article,
we exhaustively study the anomaly freedom of effective loop quantum cosmology
with generalized holonomy corrections, considering loop correction of the
constraints at the perturbative order. We pedagogically explain why, although
the holonomy correction -- including the details of the chosen scheme --
applied on the background part of the constraints is crucial, it becomes
irrelevant when implemented on perturbative expansions, in the sense that all
consequences are "absorbed" in the counter-terms used for the regularization.
The possibility of closing the algebra of constraints without counter-terms is
also studied. It is argued that, although enforcing a first-class algebra is a
strong requirement, this can be achieved in several different ways, often
overlooked, which generates ambiguities on the restriction of the form of the
generalized holonomy correction. Those ambiguities are examined in details,
leading to the conclusion that the consistency of the effective theory for
cosmological perturbations, especially when considering scalar modes, cannot be
achieved without counter-terms. We also take the opportunity of this work to
clarify, as much as possible, all the required steps so that future works have
a clear material at disposal. In particular, a highly detailed calculation of
all the brackets is provided, emphasizing the (usually implicit) assumptions,
hypotheses and manipulations required to ensure the closure of the algebra.
Prospects for future works are underlined.