To Determine the Effectiveness of Current Ethical Teachings in Medical Students and Ways to Reform this Aspect

IF 2.2 Q1 ETHICS
Rida Saleem, Syeda Zainab Fatima, Roha Shafaut, Asifa Maqbool, Faiza Zakaria, Saba Zaheer, Musfirah Danyal Barry, Haris Jawaid, Dr. Fauzia Imtiaz
{"title":"To Determine the Effectiveness of Current Ethical Teachings in Medical Students and Ways to Reform this Aspect","authors":"Rida Saleem, Syeda Zainab Fatima, Roha Shafaut, Asifa Maqbool, Faiza Zakaria, Saba Zaheer, Musfirah Danyal Barry, Haris Jawaid, Dr. Fauzia Imtiaz","doi":"10.1007/s10805-024-09550-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To determine the effectiveness of current ethical teaching and to suggest ways to reform the current ethical curriculum in light of students’ perspectives and experiences. Students of Dow Medical College were selected for this cross-sectional study conducted between the year 2020 till 2023. The sample size was 387, calculated by OpenEpi. A questionnaire consisting of 17 close-ended questions was used to collect data from participants selected via stratified random sampling. The questionnaire consisted of two parts. The first part included the demographics. While the second contained 15 questions designed to assess the participants’ current teaching of ethics and effective ways to further improve it. The data obtained were analyzed using IBM SPSS statistics 26. Out of the 376 students who gave consent, the majority of the respondents (64.6%) encountered situations where they felt that their current teaching of ethics was insufficient and (54%) believed that the current teaching of ethics could be improved and made further effective. Practical sessions, PBLs (problem-based learning), case analysis, and ward visits were some of the ways the participants believed could help improve the teaching of medical ethics. Most students (92.8%) agreed that external factors like burnout and excessive workload have an impact on medical professionals’ ethical practices. In light of our study, a refined curriculum with a focus on ethical teaching must be established, with input from students to ensure that the medical students have the necessary expertise to manage an ethical dilemma.</p>","PeriodicalId":45961,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Ethics","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09550-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To determine the effectiveness of current ethical teaching and to suggest ways to reform the current ethical curriculum in light of students’ perspectives and experiences. Students of Dow Medical College were selected for this cross-sectional study conducted between the year 2020 till 2023. The sample size was 387, calculated by OpenEpi. A questionnaire consisting of 17 close-ended questions was used to collect data from participants selected via stratified random sampling. The questionnaire consisted of two parts. The first part included the demographics. While the second contained 15 questions designed to assess the participants’ current teaching of ethics and effective ways to further improve it. The data obtained were analyzed using IBM SPSS statistics 26. Out of the 376 students who gave consent, the majority of the respondents (64.6%) encountered situations where they felt that their current teaching of ethics was insufficient and (54%) believed that the current teaching of ethics could be improved and made further effective. Practical sessions, PBLs (problem-based learning), case analysis, and ward visits were some of the ways the participants believed could help improve the teaching of medical ethics. Most students (92.8%) agreed that external factors like burnout and excessive workload have an impact on medical professionals’ ethical practices. In light of our study, a refined curriculum with a focus on ethical teaching must be established, with input from students to ensure that the medical students have the necessary expertise to manage an ethical dilemma.

Abstract Image

确定目前对医学生进行伦理教育的效果及改革方法
确定当前伦理教学的有效性,并根据学生的观点和经验提出改革当前伦理课程的建议。这项横断面研究选取了陶尔医学院的学生,研究时间为 2020 年至 2023 年。样本量为 387 个,由 OpenEpi 计算得出。研究人员通过分层随机抽样的方式,向被选中的参与者发放了由 17 个封闭式问题组成的调查问卷,以收集数据。问卷由两部分组成。第一部分包括人口统计数据。第二部分包含 15 个问题,旨在评估参与者目前的伦理教学情况以及进一步改进的有效方法。我们使用 IBM SPSS 统计 26 对所获得的数据进行了分析。在征得同意的 376 名学生中,大多数受访者(64.6%)认为目前的伦理教学存在不足,54% 的受访者认为目前的伦理教学可以改进并进一步提高效果。实践课、PBL(基于问题的学习)、病例分析和病房参观是学员们认为有助于改进医学伦理学教学的一些方法。大多数学生(92.8%)同意职业倦怠和过重的工作量等外部因素会影响医务人员的医德实践。根据我们的研究,必须建立以伦理教学为重点的细化课程,并听取学生的意见,以确保医学生具备处理伦理困境所需的专业知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: The Journal of Academic Ethics is a multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary, peer reviewed journal which examines all ethical issues which arise within the scope of university purposes. The journal publishes original research in the ethics of research production and publication; teaching and student relations; leadership; management and governance. The journal offers sustained inquiry into such topics as the ethics of university strategic directions; ethical investments; sustainability practices; the responsible conduct of research and teaching; collegiality and faculty relations; and the appropriate models of ethical and accountable governance for universities in the 21st century.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信