Extending emergency care beyond discharge: Piloting a virtual after care clinic

IF 1.6 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
John Adam Oostema MD, MS, Stephanie Mullennix MSN, RN, Todd Chassee MD, Christopher Port MD, John Deveau DO, MPH, John Throop MD, MBA, Joshua C. Reynolds MD, MS
{"title":"Extending emergency care beyond discharge: Piloting a virtual after care clinic","authors":"John Adam Oostema MD, MS,&nbsp;Stephanie Mullennix MSN, RN,&nbsp;Todd Chassee MD,&nbsp;Christopher Port MD,&nbsp;John Deveau DO, MPH,&nbsp;John Throop MD, MBA,&nbsp;Joshua C. Reynolds MD, MS","doi":"10.1002/emp2.13302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Many unscheduled return visits to the emergency department (ED) stem from insufficient access to outpatient follow-up. We piloted an emergency medicine-staffed, on-demand, virtual after care clinic (VACC) as an alternative for discharged ED patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Prospective cohort study of discharged ED patients who scheduled VACC appointments within 72 hours of index ED visit. We performed descriptive analyses and compared risks of ED return at 72 hours and 30 days between patients who did/did not attend their appointment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>From March to December 2022, 309 patients scheduled VACC appointments and 210 (68%) attended them. Patients who scheduled appointments were young (median 37 years), non-Hispanic white (80%), females (75%) with a primary care physicians (PCP) (90%), and commercial insurance (72%).  Most VACC visits reinforced ED testing and/or treatment (64%) or adjusted medications (26%). VACC attendees were less likely to return to the ED within 72 h (3.3% vs. 13.1%; risk difference 9.3% [95% confidence interval, CI 2.7%‒19.8%]) and 30 days (16.2% vs. 30.3%; risk difference 14.1% [95% CI 3.8%‒24.4%]) compared to those who scheduled but did not attend a VACC appointment. VACC attendance was associated with lower odds of 72-h (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.0; 95% CI 0.0‒0.4) and 30-day (aOR 0.4; 95% CI 0.2‒0.7) return ED visits.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In this pilot study, younger, white, female, commercially insured patients with a PCP preferentially scheduled VACC appointments. Among patients who scheduled VACC appointments, those who attended their appointments were less likely to return to the ED within 72 hours and 30 days than those who did not.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/emp2.13302","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/emp2.13302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Many unscheduled return visits to the emergency department (ED) stem from insufficient access to outpatient follow-up. We piloted an emergency medicine-staffed, on-demand, virtual after care clinic (VACC) as an alternative for discharged ED patients.

Methods

Prospective cohort study of discharged ED patients who scheduled VACC appointments within 72 hours of index ED visit. We performed descriptive analyses and compared risks of ED return at 72 hours and 30 days between patients who did/did not attend their appointment.

Results

From March to December 2022, 309 patients scheduled VACC appointments and 210 (68%) attended them. Patients who scheduled appointments were young (median 37 years), non-Hispanic white (80%), females (75%) with a primary care physicians (PCP) (90%), and commercial insurance (72%).  Most VACC visits reinforced ED testing and/or treatment (64%) or adjusted medications (26%). VACC attendees were less likely to return to the ED within 72 h (3.3% vs. 13.1%; risk difference 9.3% [95% confidence interval, CI 2.7%‒19.8%]) and 30 days (16.2% vs. 30.3%; risk difference 14.1% [95% CI 3.8%‒24.4%]) compared to those who scheduled but did not attend a VACC appointment. VACC attendance was associated with lower odds of 72-h (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.0; 95% CI 0.0‒0.4) and 30-day (aOR 0.4; 95% CI 0.2‒0.7) return ED visits.

Conclusions

In this pilot study, younger, white, female, commercially insured patients with a PCP preferentially scheduled VACC appointments. Among patients who scheduled VACC appointments, those who attended their appointments were less likely to return to the ED within 72 hours and 30 days than those who did not.

Abstract Image

将急诊护理延伸至出院后:试行虚拟出院后护理诊所
目标 急诊科(ED)的许多计划外复诊都是由于门诊随访不足造成的。我们试行了一种由急诊科人员按需提供服务的虚拟诊后护理诊所(VACC),作为急诊科出院患者的一种选择。 方法 对在急诊室就诊后 72 小时内预约了 VACC 的急诊室出院患者进行前瞻性队列研究。我们进行了描述性分析,并比较了参加/未参加预约的患者在 72 小时和 30 天内再次就诊的风险。 结果 2022 年 3 月至 12 月,309 名患者预约了 VACC,其中 210 人(68%)参加了预约。预约就诊的患者均为年轻人(中位数 37 岁)、非西班牙裔白人(80%)、女性(75%)、有初级保健医生(PCP)(90%)和商业保险(72%)。 大多数 VACC 就诊者都加强了 ED 检测和/或治疗(64%)或调整了药物(26%)。与已预约但未参加 VACC 会诊的患者相比,参加 VACC 会诊的患者在 72 小时内(3.3% 对 13.1%;风险差异 9.3% [95% 置信区间,CI 2.7%-19.8%])和 30 天内(16.2% 对 30.3%;风险差异 14.1% [95% CI 3.8%-24.4%] )重返急诊室的可能性较低。参加 VACC 与较低的 72 小时(调整后几率比 [aOR] 0.0;95% CI 0.0-0.4)和 30 天(aOR 0.4;95% CI 0.2-0.7)急诊室复诊几率相关。 结论 在这项试点研究中,有初级保健医生的年轻、白人、女性商业保险患者更倾向于预约 VACC。在安排了 VACC 预约的患者中,与未参加预约的患者相比,参加预约的患者在 72 小时内和 30 天内重返急诊室的可能性较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信