Validation of different automated segmentation models for target volume contouring in postoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer and regional nodal irradiation

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Eva Meixner , Benjamin Glogauer , Sebastian Klüter , Friedrich Wagner , David Neugebauer , Line Hoeltgen , Lisa A. Dinges , Semi Harrabi , Jakob Liermann , Maria Vinsensia , Fabian Weykamp , Philipp Hoegen-Saßmannshausen , Jürgen Debus , Juliane Hörner-Rieber
{"title":"Validation of different automated segmentation models for target volume contouring in postoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer and regional nodal irradiation","authors":"Eva Meixner ,&nbsp;Benjamin Glogauer ,&nbsp;Sebastian Klüter ,&nbsp;Friedrich Wagner ,&nbsp;David Neugebauer ,&nbsp;Line Hoeltgen ,&nbsp;Lisa A. Dinges ,&nbsp;Semi Harrabi ,&nbsp;Jakob Liermann ,&nbsp;Maria Vinsensia ,&nbsp;Fabian Weykamp ,&nbsp;Philipp Hoegen-Saßmannshausen ,&nbsp;Jürgen Debus ,&nbsp;Juliane Hörner-Rieber","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Target volume delineation is routinely performed in postoperative radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer patients, but it is a time-consuming process. The aim of the present study was to validate the quality, clinical usability and institutional-specific implementation of different auto-segmentation tools into clinical routine.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Three different commercially available, artificial intelligence-, ESTRO-guideline-based segmentation models (M1-3) were applied to fifty consecutive reference patients who received postoperative local RT including regional nodal irradiation for breast cancer for the delineation of clinical target volumes: the residual breast, implant or chestwall, axilla levels 1 and 2, the infra- and supraclavicular regions, the interpectoral and internal mammary nodes. Objective evaluation metrics of the created structures were conducted with the Dice similarity index (DICE) and the Hausdorff distance, and a manual evaluation of usability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The resulting geometries of the segmentation models were compared to the reference volumes for each patient and required no or only minor corrections in 72 % (M1), 64 % (M2) and 78 % (M3) of the cases. The median DICE and Hausdorff values for the resulting planning target volumes were 0.87–0.88 and 2.96–3.55, respectively. Clinical usability was significantly correlated with the DICE index, with calculated cut-off values used to define no or minor adjustments of 0.82–0.86. Right or left sided target and breathing method (deep inspiration breath hold vs. free breathing) did not impact the quality of the resulting structures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Artificial intelligence-based auto-segmentation programs showed high-quality accuracy and provided standardization and efficient support for guideline-based target volume contouring as a precondition for fully automated workflows in radiotherapy treatment planning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 100855"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824001320/pdfft?md5=e38267f10cb1b9c6eb12938744ad4ed6&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824001320-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824001320","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Target volume delineation is routinely performed in postoperative radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer patients, but it is a time-consuming process. The aim of the present study was to validate the quality, clinical usability and institutional-specific implementation of different auto-segmentation tools into clinical routine.

Methods

Three different commercially available, artificial intelligence-, ESTRO-guideline-based segmentation models (M1-3) were applied to fifty consecutive reference patients who received postoperative local RT including regional nodal irradiation for breast cancer for the delineation of clinical target volumes: the residual breast, implant or chestwall, axilla levels 1 and 2, the infra- and supraclavicular regions, the interpectoral and internal mammary nodes. Objective evaluation metrics of the created structures were conducted with the Dice similarity index (DICE) and the Hausdorff distance, and a manual evaluation of usability.

Results

The resulting geometries of the segmentation models were compared to the reference volumes for each patient and required no or only minor corrections in 72 % (M1), 64 % (M2) and 78 % (M3) of the cases. The median DICE and Hausdorff values for the resulting planning target volumes were 0.87–0.88 and 2.96–3.55, respectively. Clinical usability was significantly correlated with the DICE index, with calculated cut-off values used to define no or minor adjustments of 0.82–0.86. Right or left sided target and breathing method (deep inspiration breath hold vs. free breathing) did not impact the quality of the resulting structures.

Conclusion

Artificial intelligence-based auto-segmentation programs showed high-quality accuracy and provided standardization and efficient support for guideline-based target volume contouring as a precondition for fully automated workflows in radiotherapy treatment planning.

在乳腺癌术后放疗和区域结节照射中验证不同的靶区轮廓自动分割模型
导言乳腺癌患者术后放疗(RT)中常规进行靶区划分,但这是一个耗时的过程。本研究旨在验证不同自动分割工具的质量、临床可用性和临床常规实施的具体机构。方法将三种不同的商用人工智能、基于 ESTRO 指南的分割模型(M1-3)应用于 50 例连续的参考患者,这些患者均接受过乳腺癌术后局部 RT(包括区域结节照射),用于划定临床目标体积:残乳、植入物或胸壁、腋窝 1 级和 2 级、锁骨下和锁骨上区域、胸骨间和乳腺内结节。使用狄斯相似度指数(DICE)和豪斯多夫距离对创建的结构进行客观评估,并对可用性进行人工评估。结果将分割模型的几何形状与每位患者的参考体积进行比较,结果显示,72%(M1)、64%(M2)和 78%(M3)的病例无需或仅需进行少量修正。得出的规划目标体积的中位 DICE 值和 Hausdorff 值分别为 0.87-0.88 和 2.96-3.55。临床可用性与DICE指数有明显的相关性,用于定义无调整或微调的计算截断值为0.82-0.86。结论基于人工智能的自动分割程序显示出高质量的准确性,为基于指南的靶体积轮廓制作提供了标准化和高效的支持,是放疗治疗计划中全自动工作流程的前提条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
40 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信