TPACK in action: Contextual effects of pre-service and in-service teachers’ knowledge structures for technology integration

IF 4.1 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Franziska Tschönhens , Iris Backfisch , Tim Fütterer , Andreas Lachner
{"title":"TPACK in action: Contextual effects of pre-service and in-service teachers’ knowledge structures for technology integration","authors":"Franziska Tschönhens ,&nbsp;Iris Backfisch ,&nbsp;Tim Fütterer ,&nbsp;Andreas Lachner","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Context is regarded to crucially affect teachers’ application of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). However, whether and how contextual variables, such as instructional context or teaching experience, influence the concrete application of the different TPACK-components remains an open question. To explore teachers’ application of TPCK in various contexts, we re-analyzed data from two studies composing <em>n</em> = 198 pre-service and <em>n</em> = 243 in-service teachers. All teachers were asked to reason about the potential integration of educational technology across three instructional contexts (i.e., individualized learning, collaborative learning, and practice tasks). We analyzed the application of the different first-order TPACK-components (i.e., technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge) using percentages and logistic regressions to determine the effects of instructional context and teaching experience. Additionally, we examined the co-occurrences of these components using Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA). Overall, we found that technological knowledge played a dominant role across all instructional contexts regardless of teaching experience. However, the application of content knowledge varied considerably across instructional contexts. The analysis of the co-occurrences showed that technological and pedagogical knowledge was consistently applied together across all instructional contexts, while content knowledge co-occurred predominantly in practice tasks. Qualitative analyses further revealed that in-service teachers applied their TPCK in a more situated way in specific teaching scenarios, whereas pre-service teachers’ reasoning was more fragmented. These findings suggest that TPACK may be conceptualized as a dynamic construct that is applied differently depending on the context and teaching experience rather than a static integration of its components.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100219"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000594/pdfft?md5=86b625d9883c6575e90a536abe745ce2&pid=1-s2.0-S2666557324000594-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context is regarded to crucially affect teachers’ application of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). However, whether and how contextual variables, such as instructional context or teaching experience, influence the concrete application of the different TPACK-components remains an open question. To explore teachers’ application of TPCK in various contexts, we re-analyzed data from two studies composing n = 198 pre-service and n = 243 in-service teachers. All teachers were asked to reason about the potential integration of educational technology across three instructional contexts (i.e., individualized learning, collaborative learning, and practice tasks). We analyzed the application of the different first-order TPACK-components (i.e., technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge) using percentages and logistic regressions to determine the effects of instructional context and teaching experience. Additionally, we examined the co-occurrences of these components using Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA). Overall, we found that technological knowledge played a dominant role across all instructional contexts regardless of teaching experience. However, the application of content knowledge varied considerably across instructional contexts. The analysis of the co-occurrences showed that technological and pedagogical knowledge was consistently applied together across all instructional contexts, while content knowledge co-occurred predominantly in practice tasks. Qualitative analyses further revealed that in-service teachers applied their TPCK in a more situated way in specific teaching scenarios, whereas pre-service teachers’ reasoning was more fragmented. These findings suggest that TPACK may be conceptualized as a dynamic construct that is applied differently depending on the context and teaching experience rather than a static integration of its components.

行动中的 TPACK:职前和在职教师技术整合知识结构的情境效应
情境被认为是影响教师应用技术教学内容知识(TPACK)的关键因素。然而,教学情境或教学经验等情境变量是否以及如何影响不同 TPACK 要素的具体应用,仍是一个未决问题。为了探索教师在不同情境中对 TPCK 的应用,我们重新分析了两项研究的数据,其中包括 198 名职前教师和 243 名在职教师。所有教师都被要求就教育技术在三种教学情境(即个性化学习、协作学习和实践任务)中的潜在整合进行推理。我们使用百分比和逻辑回归分析了不同一阶 TPACK 要素(即技术、教学和内容知识)的应用情况,以确定教学情境和教学经验的影响。此外,我们还利用认识网络分析(ENA)研究了这些要素的共同出现情况。总体而言,我们发现,无论教学经验如何,技术知识在所有教学情境中都起着主导作用。然而,在不同的教学情境中,内容知识的应用有很大差异。共同出现分析表明,在所有教学情境中,技术知识和教学法知识始终共同出现,而内容知识则主要在实践任务中共同出现。定性分析进一步显示,在职教师在具体的教学情境中更多地应用了他们的技术和教学知识,而职前教师的推理则更为零散。这些研究结果表明,TPACK 的概念可以是一种动态建构,根据不同的教学情境和教学经验以不同的方式加以应用,而不是静态地整合其组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信