Joseph A Greer,Jennifer S Temel,Areej El-Jawahri,Simone Rinaldi,Mihir Kamdar,Elyse R Park,Nora K Horick,Kedie Pintro,Dustin J Rabideau,Lee Schwamm,Josephine Feliciano,Isaac Chua,Konstantinos Leventakos,Stacy M Fischer,Toby C Campbell,Michael W Rabow,Finly Zachariah,Laura C Hanson,Sara F Martin,Maria Silveira,Laura Shoemaker,Marie Bakitas,Jessica Bauman,Lori Spoozak,Carl Grey,Leslie Blackhall,Kimberly Curseen,Sean O'Mahony,Melanie M Smith,Ramona Rhodes,Amelia Cullinan,Vicki Jackson,
{"title":"Telehealth vs In-Person Early Palliative Care for Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer: A Multisite Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Joseph A Greer,Jennifer S Temel,Areej El-Jawahri,Simone Rinaldi,Mihir Kamdar,Elyse R Park,Nora K Horick,Kedie Pintro,Dustin J Rabideau,Lee Schwamm,Josephine Feliciano,Isaac Chua,Konstantinos Leventakos,Stacy M Fischer,Toby C Campbell,Michael W Rabow,Finly Zachariah,Laura C Hanson,Sara F Martin,Maria Silveira,Laura Shoemaker,Marie Bakitas,Jessica Bauman,Lori Spoozak,Carl Grey,Leslie Blackhall,Kimberly Curseen,Sean O'Mahony,Melanie M Smith,Ramona Rhodes,Amelia Cullinan,Vicki Jackson,","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.13964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance\r\nNumerous studies show that early palliative care improves quality of life and other key outcomes in patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers, although most lack access to this evidence-based model of care.\r\n\r\nObjective\r\nTo evaluate whether delivering early palliative care via secure video vs in-person visits has an equivalent effect on quality of life in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).\r\n\r\nDesign, Setting, and Participants\r\nRandomized, multisite, comparative effectiveness trial from June 14, 2018, to May 4, 2023, at 22 US cancer centers among 1250 patients within 12 weeks of diagnosis of advanced NSCLC and 548 caregivers.\r\n\r\nIntervention\r\nParticipants were randomized to meet with a specialty-trained palliative care clinician every 4 weeks either via video visit or in person in the outpatient clinic from the time of enrollment and throughout the course of disease. The video visit group had an initial in-person visit to establish rapport, followed by subsequent virtual visits.\r\n\r\nMain Outcomes and Measures\r\nEquivalence of the effect of video visit vs in-person early palliative care on quality of life at week 24 per the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung questionnaire (equivalence margin of ±4 points; score range: 0-136, with higher scores indicating better quality of life). Participants completed study questionnaires at enrollment and at weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48.\r\n\r\nResults\r\nBy 24 weeks, participants (mean age, 65.5 years; 54.0% women; 82.7% White) had a mean of 4.7 (video) and 4.9 (in-person) early palliative care encounters. Patient-reported quality-of-life scores were equivalent between groups (video mean, 99.7 vs in-person mean, 97.7; difference, 2.0 [90% CI, 0.1-3.9]; P = .04 for equivalence). Rate of caregiver participation in visits was lower for video vs in-person early palliative care (36.6% vs 49.7%; P < .001). Study groups did not differ in caregiver quality of life, patient coping, or patient and caregiver satisfaction with care, mood symptoms, or prognostic perceptions.\r\n\r\nConclusions and Relevance\r\nThe delivery of early palliative care virtually vs in person demonstrated equivalent effects on quality of life in patients with advanced NSCLC, underscoring the considerable potential for improving access to this evidence-based care model through telehealth delivery.\r\n\r\nTrial Registration\r\nClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03375489.","PeriodicalId":518009,"journal":{"name":"JAMA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.13964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Importance
Numerous studies show that early palliative care improves quality of life and other key outcomes in patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers, although most lack access to this evidence-based model of care.
Objective
To evaluate whether delivering early palliative care via secure video vs in-person visits has an equivalent effect on quality of life in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Design, Setting, and Participants
Randomized, multisite, comparative effectiveness trial from June 14, 2018, to May 4, 2023, at 22 US cancer centers among 1250 patients within 12 weeks of diagnosis of advanced NSCLC and 548 caregivers.
Intervention
Participants were randomized to meet with a specialty-trained palliative care clinician every 4 weeks either via video visit or in person in the outpatient clinic from the time of enrollment and throughout the course of disease. The video visit group had an initial in-person visit to establish rapport, followed by subsequent virtual visits.
Main Outcomes and Measures
Equivalence of the effect of video visit vs in-person early palliative care on quality of life at week 24 per the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung questionnaire (equivalence margin of ±4 points; score range: 0-136, with higher scores indicating better quality of life). Participants completed study questionnaires at enrollment and at weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48.
Results
By 24 weeks, participants (mean age, 65.5 years; 54.0% women; 82.7% White) had a mean of 4.7 (video) and 4.9 (in-person) early palliative care encounters. Patient-reported quality-of-life scores were equivalent between groups (video mean, 99.7 vs in-person mean, 97.7; difference, 2.0 [90% CI, 0.1-3.9]; P = .04 for equivalence). Rate of caregiver participation in visits was lower for video vs in-person early palliative care (36.6% vs 49.7%; P < .001). Study groups did not differ in caregiver quality of life, patient coping, or patient and caregiver satisfaction with care, mood symptoms, or prognostic perceptions.
Conclusions and Relevance
The delivery of early palliative care virtually vs in person demonstrated equivalent effects on quality of life in patients with advanced NSCLC, underscoring the considerable potential for improving access to this evidence-based care model through telehealth delivery.
Trial Registration
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03375489.