Direct reinfusion of pericardial blood complications: A case of acute respiratory distress syndrome and disseminated intravascular coagulation

IF 1.5 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Takuto Yasuda, Kasumi Satoh, Nobuhisa Hirasawa, Manabu Okuyama, Hajime Nakae
{"title":"Direct reinfusion of pericardial blood complications: A case of acute respiratory distress syndrome and disseminated intravascular coagulation","authors":"Takuto Yasuda,&nbsp;Kasumi Satoh,&nbsp;Nobuhisa Hirasawa,&nbsp;Manabu Okuyama,&nbsp;Hajime Nakae","doi":"10.1002/ams2.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Direct reinfusion of pericardial blood during cardiac surgery triggers a systemic inflammatory response. Although various inflammatory mediators have been identified as triggers, the role of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) remains poorly understood. Despite guidelines recommending against this practice owing to its harmful effects, it is sometimes used in emergencies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Case Presentation</h3>\n \n <p>A 72-year-old man with atrial fibrillation and cerebral infarction developed cardiac tamponade during catheter ablation. He underwent pericardial drainage and direct blood reinfusion. He was transferred to our ICU, where he developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Despite aggressive management, the patient died 41 days after admission.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This case highlights severe adverse events following direct reinfusion of pericardial blood. These findings suggest a significant role for DAMPs in mediating these inflammatory responses. Direct reinfusion of pericardial drainage blood should be avoided during emergencies to prevent life-threatening complications.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7196,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ams2.70005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ams2.70005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Direct reinfusion of pericardial blood during cardiac surgery triggers a systemic inflammatory response. Although various inflammatory mediators have been identified as triggers, the role of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) remains poorly understood. Despite guidelines recommending against this practice owing to its harmful effects, it is sometimes used in emergencies.

Case Presentation

A 72-year-old man with atrial fibrillation and cerebral infarction developed cardiac tamponade during catheter ablation. He underwent pericardial drainage and direct blood reinfusion. He was transferred to our ICU, where he developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Despite aggressive management, the patient died 41 days after admission.

Conclusion

This case highlights severe adverse events following direct reinfusion of pericardial blood. These findings suggest a significant role for DAMPs in mediating these inflammatory responses. Direct reinfusion of pericardial drainage blood should be avoided during emergencies to prevent life-threatening complications.

Abstract Image

直接再灌注心包血并发症:一例急性呼吸窘迫综合征和弥散性血管内凝血病例
背景 心脏手术中心包血的直接再灌注会引发全身炎症反应。虽然各种炎症介质已被确定为诱因,但损伤相关分子模式(DAMPs)的作用仍鲜为人知。尽管指南建议不要采用这种做法,因为这种做法会产生有害影响,但有时在紧急情况下仍会采用。 病例介绍 一名患有心房颤动和脑梗塞的 72 岁男性在导管消融过程中出现心脏填塞。他接受了心包引流和直接血液再灌注。他被转到我们的重症监护室,在那里出现了急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)和弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)。尽管采取了积极的治疗措施,患者还是在入院 41 天后死亡。 结论 本病例强调了直接再输注心包血后的严重不良反应。这些研究结果表明,DAMPs 在介导这些炎症反应中起着重要作用。在紧急情况下应避免直接再输注心包引流血,以防止出现危及生命的并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acute Medicine & Surgery
Acute Medicine & Surgery MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信