Advances and gaps in policy, practice, and research in transition for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities across four countries

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Jan Šiška, Julie Beadle-Brown, Renáta Tichá, Roger Stancliffe, Brian Abery, Šárka Káňová
{"title":"Advances and gaps in policy, practice, and research in transition for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities across four countries","authors":"Jan Šiška,&nbsp;Julie Beadle-Brown,&nbsp;Renáta Tichá,&nbsp;Roger Stancliffe,&nbsp;Brian Abery,&nbsp;Šárka Káňová","doi":"10.1111/jppi.12524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The difficulties faced by youth with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs) and their families as they move into adulthood are widely documented. The aim of the paper is to explore the current situation in terms of transition processes and outcomes in four countries (the US, UK, Australia and Czech Republic) and identify commonalities and differences that help elucidate what might determine different outcomes. Two research methods—expert knowledge and rapid literature review—were combined to identify sources from which information on transition policy, processes, support practices and outcomes was extracted and synthesised. This review identified gaps in the research evidence including inadequate collection and use of data to drive policy and determine effectiveness, limited evidence-based models or frameworks for successful transition. There was little transition research that included the voices of young people with IDD. More research is necessary to study the practices of highly successful programmes, and to explore the impact of transition programmes and disability support services on a broader range of outcomes, capturing the experiences of young people themselves and identifying factors that determine successful outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jppi.12524","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jppi.12524","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The difficulties faced by youth with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs) and their families as they move into adulthood are widely documented. The aim of the paper is to explore the current situation in terms of transition processes and outcomes in four countries (the US, UK, Australia and Czech Republic) and identify commonalities and differences that help elucidate what might determine different outcomes. Two research methods—expert knowledge and rapid literature review—were combined to identify sources from which information on transition policy, processes, support practices and outcomes was extracted and synthesised. This review identified gaps in the research evidence including inadequate collection and use of data to drive policy and determine effectiveness, limited evidence-based models or frameworks for successful transition. There was little transition research that included the voices of young people with IDD. More research is necessary to study the practices of highly successful programmes, and to explore the impact of transition programmes and disability support services on a broader range of outcomes, capturing the experiences of young people themselves and identifying factors that determine successful outcomes.

四个国家在智力和发育障碍学生过渡政策、实践和研究方面的进展和差距
有智力和发育障碍(IDDs)的青少年及其家庭在步入成年期时所面临的困难已被广泛记录在案。本文旨在探讨四个国家(美国、英国、澳大利亚和捷克共和国)在过渡过程和结果方面的现状,并找出共性和差异,以帮助阐明可能决定不同结果的因素。我们结合了两种研究方法--专家知识和快速文献综述--来确定信息来源,并从中提取和综合有关过渡政策、过程、支持实践和结果的信息。这次审查发现了研究证据方面的差距,包括没有充分收集和使用数据来推动政策和确定成效,基于证据的成功过渡模式或框架有限。很少有过渡研究包含智障青少年的声音。有必要开展更多的研究,以研究非常成功的计划的做法,探讨过渡计划和残疾支持服务对更广泛的结果的影响,捕捉年轻人自己的经验,并确定决定成功结果的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
38
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信