Resin sealant Monomer Conversion using blue laser-diode or blue LED

Caroline Dudish, Tori Hayes, Frederick Allen Rueggeberg, Rafael Rocha Pacheco
{"title":"Resin sealant Monomer Conversion using blue laser-diode or blue LED","authors":"Caroline Dudish,&nbsp;Tori Hayes,&nbsp;Frederick Allen Rueggeberg,&nbsp;Rafael Rocha Pacheco","doi":"10.1016/j.dentre.2024.100099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>OBJECTIVES</h3><p>Evaluate the degree of monomer conversion (DC) of various resin sealants when photocured using a blue laser-diode or commercially available LED light-curing units (LCUs).</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>Three different LCUs were utilized: [LA] blue laser-diode (Monet®, AMD Lasers); [SP] singlepeak blue LED (Elipar™ DeepCure-S, 3M Deutschland GmbH); [MP] multi-peak LED (VALO™ X, Ultradent Products). The spectral irradiance of each LCU was measured using a calibrated integrating sphere/spectral radiometer. Two resin sealants were tested: [CP] Clinpro™ Sealant (3M ESPE) and [XT] UltraSeal XT™ hydro™ (Ultradent Products). Sealants were placed and cured on extracted, human third molars to determine the average sealant clinical thickness: 2.0 mm. Resin sealants (n = 5) were directly dispensed onto the temperature-controlled surface (35oC) of an attenuated total reflectance attachment (Golden Gate; Specac Inc) on a Fourier-transform infrared spectrometer (INVENIO-R, Bruker) inside a custom 3D-printed mold: 2mmh; 5mm-id. LCU distance was standardized at 2.5mm. A Mylar® strip was positioned over the resin sealant for uniform thickness. Exposure durations were defined as: LA-1s, LA-2s, LA-3s, SP-30s, MP-10s (standard mode), and MP-3s (“xtra” mode). The DC (%) was computed using vibrational spectroscopy software (OPUS, Bruker) using peak height ratio changes of aromatic/aliphatic C=C, assessed at five 1-minute intervals. Each resin sealant was exposed using its manufacturer recommended LCU and also with LA. Data analysis was performed using software (GraphPad Prism 10.0.2) employing ANOVA at a pre-set alpha of 0.05.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>For each sealant, both SP-30s and MP-10s achieved a higher DC than LA-1s. While SP-30s surpassed LA-2s, MP-10s equaled LA-2. There was no DC difference between LA-3, SP-30s, and MP-10s. MP-3s was not different from LA2s.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>Using manufacturer's suggested LCU and exposure yielded higher DC than a 1-second laser exposure. Extending laser exposure to 3 seconds made DC values comparable. Further research is needed to address clinical ramifications of employing a laser-diode LCU.</p></div><div><h3>IMPLICATIONS</h3><p>Using the manufacturer-recommended light-curing unit (LCU) and cure duration yielded results similar to those of the 3-second exposure with the LA curing light, but not to the 1-second cure suggested by the LA manufacturer. Employing a 3-second LA curing light method could be a suitable option for placing sealants (small areas) in uncooperative children and patients who would benefit from reduced chair time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100364,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Review","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100099"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559624000221/pdfft?md5=d8c42ae748eb6ff31f4dd68c86ad34ef&pid=1-s2.0-S2772559624000221-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559624000221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the degree of monomer conversion (DC) of various resin sealants when photocured using a blue laser-diode or commercially available LED light-curing units (LCUs).

METHODS

Three different LCUs were utilized: [LA] blue laser-diode (Monet®, AMD Lasers); [SP] singlepeak blue LED (Elipar™ DeepCure-S, 3M Deutschland GmbH); [MP] multi-peak LED (VALO™ X, Ultradent Products). The spectral irradiance of each LCU was measured using a calibrated integrating sphere/spectral radiometer. Two resin sealants were tested: [CP] Clinpro™ Sealant (3M ESPE) and [XT] UltraSeal XT™ hydro™ (Ultradent Products). Sealants were placed and cured on extracted, human third molars to determine the average sealant clinical thickness: 2.0 mm. Resin sealants (n = 5) were directly dispensed onto the temperature-controlled surface (35oC) of an attenuated total reflectance attachment (Golden Gate; Specac Inc) on a Fourier-transform infrared spectrometer (INVENIO-R, Bruker) inside a custom 3D-printed mold: 2mmh; 5mm-id. LCU distance was standardized at 2.5mm. A Mylar® strip was positioned over the resin sealant for uniform thickness. Exposure durations were defined as: LA-1s, LA-2s, LA-3s, SP-30s, MP-10s (standard mode), and MP-3s (“xtra” mode). The DC (%) was computed using vibrational spectroscopy software (OPUS, Bruker) using peak height ratio changes of aromatic/aliphatic C=C, assessed at five 1-minute intervals. Each resin sealant was exposed using its manufacturer recommended LCU and also with LA. Data analysis was performed using software (GraphPad Prism 10.0.2) employing ANOVA at a pre-set alpha of 0.05.

RESULTS

For each sealant, both SP-30s and MP-10s achieved a higher DC than LA-1s. While SP-30s surpassed LA-2s, MP-10s equaled LA-2. There was no DC difference between LA-3, SP-30s, and MP-10s. MP-3s was not different from LA2s.

CONCLUSIONS

Using manufacturer's suggested LCU and exposure yielded higher DC than a 1-second laser exposure. Extending laser exposure to 3 seconds made DC values comparable. Further research is needed to address clinical ramifications of employing a laser-diode LCU.

IMPLICATIONS

Using the manufacturer-recommended light-curing unit (LCU) and cure duration yielded results similar to those of the 3-second exposure with the LA curing light, but not to the 1-second cure suggested by the LA manufacturer. Employing a 3-second LA curing light method could be a suitable option for placing sealants (small areas) in uncooperative children and patients who would benefit from reduced chair time.

使用蓝色激光二极管或蓝色发光二极管进行树脂密封剂单体转换
目的评估使用蓝色激光二极管或市售 LED 光固化装置(LCU)进行光固化时各种树脂密封剂的单体转换(DC)程度:[LA] 蓝色激光二极管(Monet®,AMD Lasers);[SP] 单峰值蓝色 LED(Elipar™ DeepCure-S,3M Deutschland GmbH);[MP] 多峰值 LED(VALO™ X,Ultradent Products)。使用校准积分球/光谱辐射计测量每个 LCU 的光谱辐照度。测试了两种树脂密封剂:[CP] Clinpro™ 密封剂(3M ESPE)和[XT] UltraSeal XT™ hydro™(Ultradent Products)。在拔出的人类第三磨牙上放置并固化封闭剂,以确定封闭剂的平均临床厚度:2.0 毫米。将树脂封闭剂(n = 5)直接涂抹在傅立叶变换红外光谱仪(INVENIO-R,布鲁克公司)的衰减全反射附件(Golden Gate;Specac Inc)的温控表面(35oC)上,该附件位于定制的 3D 打印模具内:2mmh;5mm-id。LCU 距离标准化为 2.5mm。在树脂密封剂上放置了一条 Mylar® 带,以保证厚度均匀。曝光持续时间定义为LA-1s、LA-2s、LA-3s、SP-30s、MP-10s(标准模式)和 MP-3s("额外 "模式)。使用振动光谱软件(OPUS,布鲁克公司),利用芳香族/脂肪族 C=C 的峰高比变化计算直流电(%),以 5 次 1 分钟的间隔进行评估。每种树脂密封剂都使用其制造商推荐的 LCU 和 LA 进行暴露。使用软件(GraphPad Prism 10.0.2)进行数据分析,采用方差分析,预设α值为 0.05。结果对于每种密封剂,SP-30 和 MP-10 的 DC 值都高于 LA-1。SP-30 密封剂超过了 LA-2,而 MP-10 密封剂则与 LA-2 相当。LA-3、SP-30 和 MP-10 的直流电没有差异。结论采用制造商建议的 LCU 和曝光可获得比 1 秒激光曝光更高的直流电。将激光照射时间延长至 3 秒可使直流电值相当。意义采用制造商推荐的光固化单元(LCU)和固化持续时间的结果与 LA 固化灯照射 3 秒的结果相似,但与 LA 制造商建议的 1 秒固化结果不同。对于不合作的儿童和需要缩短治疗时间的患者来说,使用 3 秒 LA 固化光的方法可能是一种合适的选择,可用于粘贴密封剂(小面积)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信