Comparison of in-process laser drying with furnace and vacuum drying to reduce moisture of AlSi10Mg powder processed in Laser Powder Bed Fusion

{"title":"Comparison of in-process laser drying with furnace and vacuum drying to reduce moisture of AlSi10Mg powder processed in Laser Powder Bed Fusion","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.procir.2024.08.086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In most powder bed-based laser melting systems (PBF-LB), metal powders must be handled without inertization but in an air atmosphere for a short time, increasing the AlSi10Mg powder moisture and reducing the achievable component density. Consequently, different drying methods were investigated. Drying in a furnace with an inert atmosphere, using a vacuum to evaporate the water at low temperatures, and vaporizing moisture layerwise from the spreaded powder with a defocused, low-power laser beam as a further process step of the PBF-LB process. Therefore, four different moisturized powders, which were dried with different settings for the drying methods, are analyzed. All drying methods reduce the moisture content of the powder, with in-process drying being the most effective. Due to the oxide layer growth around the particles during furnace and vacuum drying, the achievable sample density after drying is worse. In-process drying with low energy density is the best option to reach a reduction of hydrogen pores and an increase of density.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20535,"journal":{"name":"Procedia CIRP","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827124004402/pdf?md5=5743502929b2123f459aa09b3925a0c5&pid=1-s2.0-S2212827124004402-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia CIRP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827124004402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In most powder bed-based laser melting systems (PBF-LB), metal powders must be handled without inertization but in an air atmosphere for a short time, increasing the AlSi10Mg powder moisture and reducing the achievable component density. Consequently, different drying methods were investigated. Drying in a furnace with an inert atmosphere, using a vacuum to evaporate the water at low temperatures, and vaporizing moisture layerwise from the spreaded powder with a defocused, low-power laser beam as a further process step of the PBF-LB process. Therefore, four different moisturized powders, which were dried with different settings for the drying methods, are analyzed. All drying methods reduce the moisture content of the powder, with in-process drying being the most effective. Due to the oxide layer growth around the particles during furnace and vacuum drying, the achievable sample density after drying is worse. In-process drying with low energy density is the best option to reach a reduction of hydrogen pores and an increase of density.

比较过程中激光干燥与熔炉干燥和真空干燥,以降低激光粉末床熔融技术中加工的硅镁铝粉的湿度
在大多数粉末床基激光熔化系统(PBF-LB)中,金属粉末必须在没有惰化的情况下在空气环境中短时间处理,这样会增加 AlSi10Mg 粉末的水分,降低可达到的成分密度。因此,对不同的干燥方法进行了研究。在带有惰性气氛的熔炉中进行干燥,使用真空在低温下蒸发水分,以及作为 PBF-LB 工艺的进一步工艺步骤,使用散焦的低功率激光束从铺展的粉末中逐层蒸发水分。因此,我们对四种不同的保湿粉末进行了分析,这些粉末采用不同的干燥方法进行干燥。所有干燥方法都能降低粉末的含水量,其中以工序内干燥最为有效。由于在炉内和真空干燥过程中颗粒周围的氧化层生长,干燥后可达到的样品密度较低。低能量密度的过程中干燥是减少氢孔和增加密度的最佳选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信