Clinical Outcomes of Proton Beam Therapy for Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

IF 2.2 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Ichiro Seto MD, DMD, PhD , Hisashi Yamaguchi MD, PhD , Yoshiaki Takagawa MD, PhD , Yusuke Azami MD, PhD , Kanako Takayama DMD, PhD , Motohisa Suzuki MD, PhD , Masanori Machida MD , Yuntao Dai MD, PhD , Nor Shazrina Binti Sulaiman MD, PhD , Yasuhiro Kikuchi MD, PhD , Takahiro Kato PhD , Noriyuki Nishino MD, PhD , Yasushi Teranishi MD, PhD , Masao Murakami MD, PhD
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes of Proton Beam Therapy for Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study","authors":"Ichiro Seto MD, DMD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hisashi Yamaguchi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yoshiaki Takagawa MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yusuke Azami MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Kanako Takayama DMD, PhD ,&nbsp;Motohisa Suzuki MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Masanori Machida MD ,&nbsp;Yuntao Dai MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Nor Shazrina Binti Sulaiman MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yasuhiro Kikuchi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Takahiro Kato PhD ,&nbsp;Noriyuki Nishino MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yasushi Teranishi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Masao Murakami MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>We retrospectively researched the treatment outcome of proton beam therapy (PBT) and assessed its efficacy for inoperable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) at our institution.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>Fifty-four patients (28 men and 26 women, median age 67 years ranging from 40-88 years) were diagnosed with unresectable stage III LAPC and administered PBT from April 2009 to March 2020. Patients who could not complete PBT, had new distant metastases during the treatment, or did not have enough follow-up time were excluded from this study. All patients were clinically staged based on the International Union of Cancer TNM staging system (eighth edition) using computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography and were diagnosed as stage III (histologic type: 18 patients with adenocarcinoma and 36 clinically diagnosed patients). PBT was performed using the passive method, with a median total dose of 67.5 GyE (range, 50-77 GyE/25-35 fractions).</p><p>Chemotherapy was used in combination during PBT in 46 patients (85.2%). Overall survival (OS), local progression-free survival (LPFS), progression-free survival, and median OS time were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for the following factors: maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), Eastern Cooperative Group performance status (PS), tumor site, total irradiation dose, concurrent chemotherapy, and primary tumor site. Cutoff values for SUVmax and tumor diameter were estimated using receiver operating characteristic curves and the area under the curve based on OS. Multivariate analysis was evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards models. Adverse events were evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The median observation period was 17.4 months, ranging from 4.0 to 89.7 months. The median tumor diameter was 36.5 mm, ranging from 15 to 90 mm, the median SUVmax was 5.85 (range, 2.1-27.6), and their cutoff values were estimated to be 37 mm and 4.8 mm, respectively. The 1- and 2-year OS was 77.8% and 35.2%, respectively, with a median OS time of 18.2 months, and only one patient survived &gt;5 years. Twelve patients (22.2%) developed local recurrence, and 1- and 2-year LPFS rates were 89.7% and 74.5%, respectively; progression-free survival at 1 year was 58.8%. The PS score, tumor site, and irradiation dose were the prognostic factors related to OS that showed a significant difference. On the other hand, there was a significant difference in factors involved in LPFS, at 96.7%/77.9% in the first year and 86.6%/54.4% in the second year in the groups with tumor dose ≥67.5 GyE and &lt;67.5 GyE, respectively (<em>P</em> = .015). Treatment-related acute toxicities were neutropenia (grade 1/2/3 at 3.7%/11.1%/31.5%, respectively), leukopenia (grade 1/2/3 at 1.8%/7.4%/20.4%, respectively), and thrombocytopenia (grade 1/2 at 1.8%/7.4%, respectively), whereas the late effects including peptic ulcer were captured only grade 2+. The late adverse events of grade 3 or higher were not observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>PBT achieving 67.5 Gy combined with standard chemotherapy showed excellent local control for unresectable LAPC. Total irradiation dose, tumor site, and PS score at an initial diagnosis could be important prognostic factors. In this study, the dose-effect relationship was found, so an increase in dose should be considered to improve prognosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 10","pages":"Article 101577"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001404/pdfft?md5=e7c85154553e6d1c892b6de3f91dc27a&pid=1-s2.0-S2452109424001404-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

We retrospectively researched the treatment outcome of proton beam therapy (PBT) and assessed its efficacy for inoperable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) at our institution.

Methods and Materials

Fifty-four patients (28 men and 26 women, median age 67 years ranging from 40-88 years) were diagnosed with unresectable stage III LAPC and administered PBT from April 2009 to March 2020. Patients who could not complete PBT, had new distant metastases during the treatment, or did not have enough follow-up time were excluded from this study. All patients were clinically staged based on the International Union of Cancer TNM staging system (eighth edition) using computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography and were diagnosed as stage III (histologic type: 18 patients with adenocarcinoma and 36 clinically diagnosed patients). PBT was performed using the passive method, with a median total dose of 67.5 GyE (range, 50-77 GyE/25-35 fractions).

Chemotherapy was used in combination during PBT in 46 patients (85.2%). Overall survival (OS), local progression-free survival (LPFS), progression-free survival, and median OS time were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for the following factors: maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), Eastern Cooperative Group performance status (PS), tumor site, total irradiation dose, concurrent chemotherapy, and primary tumor site. Cutoff values for SUVmax and tumor diameter were estimated using receiver operating characteristic curves and the area under the curve based on OS. Multivariate analysis was evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards models. Adverse events were evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.

Results

The median observation period was 17.4 months, ranging from 4.0 to 89.7 months. The median tumor diameter was 36.5 mm, ranging from 15 to 90 mm, the median SUVmax was 5.85 (range, 2.1-27.6), and their cutoff values were estimated to be 37 mm and 4.8 mm, respectively. The 1- and 2-year OS was 77.8% and 35.2%, respectively, with a median OS time of 18.2 months, and only one patient survived >5 years. Twelve patients (22.2%) developed local recurrence, and 1- and 2-year LPFS rates were 89.7% and 74.5%, respectively; progression-free survival at 1 year was 58.8%. The PS score, tumor site, and irradiation dose were the prognostic factors related to OS that showed a significant difference. On the other hand, there was a significant difference in factors involved in LPFS, at 96.7%/77.9% in the first year and 86.6%/54.4% in the second year in the groups with tumor dose ≥67.5 GyE and <67.5 GyE, respectively (P = .015). Treatment-related acute toxicities were neutropenia (grade 1/2/3 at 3.7%/11.1%/31.5%, respectively), leukopenia (grade 1/2/3 at 1.8%/7.4%/20.4%, respectively), and thrombocytopenia (grade 1/2 at 1.8%/7.4%, respectively), whereas the late effects including peptic ulcer were captured only grade 2+. The late adverse events of grade 3 or higher were not observed.

Conclusions

PBT achieving 67.5 Gy combined with standard chemotherapy showed excellent local control for unresectable LAPC. Total irradiation dose, tumor site, and PS score at an initial diagnosis could be important prognostic factors. In this study, the dose-effect relationship was found, so an increase in dose should be considered to improve prognosis.

质子束疗法治疗无法切除的局部晚期胰腺癌的临床疗效:单中心回顾性研究
目的我们回顾性研究了质子束治疗(PBT)的治疗结果,并评估了其对本院无法手术的局部晚期胰腺癌(LAPC)的疗效。方法和材料自2009年4月至2020年3月,54名患者(28名男性,26名女性,中位年龄67岁,40-88岁不等)被诊断为无法切除的III期LAPC,并接受了PBT治疗。本研究排除了无法完成 PBT、治疗期间出现新的远处转移或随访时间不足的患者。所有患者均根据国际癌症联盟 TNM 分期系统(第八版),采用计算机断层扫描、磁共振成像和正电子发射断层扫描技术进行临床分期,并被诊断为 III 期(组织学类型:腺癌、恶性肿瘤、恶性淋巴瘤和恶性肿瘤):组织学类型:18 名腺癌患者和 36 名临床诊断患者)。46名患者(85.2%)在PBT期间联合使用了化疗。总生存期(OS)、局部无进展生存期(LPFS)、无进展生存期和中位OS时间通过卡普兰-梅耶检验和对数秩检验进行分析。对以下因素进行了单变量和多变量分析:最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)、东部合作组表现状态(PS)、肿瘤部位、总照射剂量、同期化疗和原发肿瘤部位。使用接收者操作特征曲线和基于OS的曲线下面积估算SUVmax和肿瘤直径的临界值。多变量分析采用 Cox 比例危险模型进行评估。结果中位观察期为17.4个月,从4.0个月到89.7个月不等。肿瘤直径中位数为36.5毫米,范围为15至90毫米,SUVmax中位数为5.85(范围为2.1至27.6),其临界值估计分别为37毫米和4.8毫米。1年和2年的OS分别为77.8%和35.2%,中位OS时间为18.2个月,只有一名患者存活了5年。12名患者(22.2%)出现局部复发,1年和2年LPFS率分别为89.7%和74.5%;1年无进展生存率为58.8%。PS评分、肿瘤部位和照射剂量是与OS相关的预后因素,三者之间存在显著差异。另一方面,肿瘤剂量≥67.5 GyE组和<67.5 GyE组的LPFS相关因素存在显著差异,第一年分别为96.7%/77.9%,第二年分别为86.6%/54.4%(P = .015)。治疗相关的急性毒性为中性粒细胞减少(1/2/3级,分别为3.7%/11.1%/31.5%)、白细胞减少(1/2/3级,分别为1.8%/7.4%/20.4%)和血小板减少(1/2级,分别为1.8%/7.4%),而包括消化性溃疡在内的晚期反应仅为2+级。结论67.5 Gy的PBT联合标准化疗对不可切除的LAPC有很好的局部控制效果。总照射剂量、肿瘤部位和初诊时的 PS 评分可能是重要的预后因素。本研究发现了剂量效应关系,因此应考虑增加剂量以改善预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Radiation Oncology
Advances in Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信