Road user opinions and needs regarding small modular autonomous electric vehicles: Differences between elderly and non-elderly in Norway

IF 2.3 4区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Claudia Moscoso, Isabelle Roche-Cerasi
{"title":"Road user opinions and needs regarding small modular autonomous electric vehicles: Differences between elderly and non-elderly in Norway","authors":"Claudia Moscoso,&nbsp;Isabelle Roche-Cerasi","doi":"10.1049/itr2.12545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examines road user opinions regarding small modular autonomous electric vehicles, focusing on the differences between the elderly and non-elderly populations in Norway. The data allowed for a comparison between 193 respondents under 65 years old and 208 respondents over 65 years old. The results highlighted significant differences between the two groups about the vehicles, their usability, and the likeliness of using them as public transport if implemented in the future. Traffic safety and personal security were found to be decisive aspects, for respondents over 65 years old being more worried about safety and security than their counterparts. Trust that the authorities will ensure the safe implementation of such vehicles in the current transportation system was also significantly different between the two groups, with the younger generations having more trust in the authorities than the older group. The results shed light on road user opinions about a small modular transport mode, particularly on those over 65 years old, indicating a need for research efforts to better identify how this new form of public transport should be implemented in the future to improve the mobility of all travellers and meet the needs of the seniors.</p>","PeriodicalId":50381,"journal":{"name":"IET Intelligent Transport Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/itr2.12545","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Intelligent Transport Systems","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/itr2.12545","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines road user opinions regarding small modular autonomous electric vehicles, focusing on the differences between the elderly and non-elderly populations in Norway. The data allowed for a comparison between 193 respondents under 65 years old and 208 respondents over 65 years old. The results highlighted significant differences between the two groups about the vehicles, their usability, and the likeliness of using them as public transport if implemented in the future. Traffic safety and personal security were found to be decisive aspects, for respondents over 65 years old being more worried about safety and security than their counterparts. Trust that the authorities will ensure the safe implementation of such vehicles in the current transportation system was also significantly different between the two groups, with the younger generations having more trust in the authorities than the older group. The results shed light on road user opinions about a small modular transport mode, particularly on those over 65 years old, indicating a need for research efforts to better identify how this new form of public transport should be implemented in the future to improve the mobility of all travellers and meet the needs of the seniors.

Abstract Image

道路使用者对小型模块化自动驾驶电动汽车的意见和需求:挪威老年人与非老年人之间的差异
本研究探讨了道路使用者对小型模块化自动驾驶电动汽车的看法,重点关注挪威老年人口与非老年人口之间的差异。数据对 193 名 65 岁以下的受访者和 208 名 65 岁以上的受访者进行了比较。结果表明,两组受访者在车辆、车辆可用性以及未来使用车辆作为公共交通工具的可能性方面存在明显差异。交通安全和人身安全是决定性因素,65 岁以上的受访者比同龄人更担心安全和人身安全。两组受访者对政府部门能否确保在现有交通系统中安全使用此类车辆的信任度也存在显著差异,年轻一代对政府部门的信任度高于年长者。研究结果揭示了道路使用者对小型模块化交通方式的看法,尤其是对 65 岁以上老年人的看法,表明有必要开展研究工作,以更好地确定今后应如何实施这种新的公共交通形式,从而改善所有旅行者的流动性并满足老年人的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IET Intelligent Transport Systems
IET Intelligent Transport Systems 工程技术-运输科技
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
159
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: IET Intelligent Transport Systems is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to research into the practical applications of ITS and infrastructures. The scope of the journal includes the following: Sustainable traffic solutions Deployments with enabling technologies Pervasive monitoring Applications; demonstrations and evaluation Economic and behavioural analyses of ITS services and scenario Data Integration and analytics Information collection and processing; image processing applications in ITS ITS aspects of electric vehicles Autonomous vehicles; connected vehicle systems; In-vehicle ITS, safety and vulnerable road user aspects Mobility as a service systems Traffic management and control Public transport systems technologies Fleet and public transport logistics Emergency and incident management Demand management and electronic payment systems Traffic related air pollution management Policy and institutional issues Interoperability, standards and architectures Funding scenarios Enforcement Human machine interaction Education, training and outreach Current Special Issue Call for papers: Intelligent Transportation Systems in Smart Cities for Sustainable Environment - https://digital-library.theiet.org/files/IET_ITS_CFP_ITSSCSE.pdf Sustainably Intelligent Mobility (SIM) - https://digital-library.theiet.org/files/IET_ITS_CFP_SIM.pdf Traffic Theory and Modelling in the Era of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data (in collaboration with World Congress for Transport Research, WCTR 2019) - https://digital-library.theiet.org/files/IET_ITS_CFP_WCTR.pdf
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信