Annabelle Choong, Yi Ming Lyu, Cheryl C. Johnson, Rachel Baggaley, Magdalena Barr-DiChiara, Muhammad S. Jamil, Nandi L. Siegfried, Christopher K. Fairley, Eric P. F. Chow, Virginia Macdonald, Jason J. Ong
{"title":"Social network-based approaches to HIV testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Annabelle Choong, Yi Ming Lyu, Cheryl C. Johnson, Rachel Baggaley, Magdalena Barr-DiChiara, Muhammad S. Jamil, Nandi L. Siegfried, Christopher K. Fairley, Eric P. F. Chow, Virginia Macdonald, Jason J. Ong","doi":"10.1002/jia2.26353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Social network-based testing approaches (SNAs) encourage individuals (“test promoters”) to motivate sexual partners and/or those in their social networks to test for HIV. We conducted a systematic review to examine the effectiveness, acceptability and cost-effectiveness of SNA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We searched five databases from January 2010 to May 2023, and included studies that compared SNA with non-SNA. We used random-effects meta-analysis to combine effect estimates. Certainty was assessed using the GRADE approach.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We identified 47 studies. SNA may increase uptake of HIV testing compared to non-SNA (RR 2.04, 95% CI: 1.06–3.95, Low certainty). The proportion of first-time testers was probably higher among partners or social contacts of test promoters using SNA compared to non-SNA (RR 1.49, 95% CI: 1.22–1.81, Moderate certainty). The proportion of people who tested positive for HIV may be higher among partners or social contacts of test promoters using SNA compared to non-SNA (RR 1.84, 95% CI: 1.01–3.35, Low certainty). There were no reports of any adverse events or harms associated with SNA. Based on six cost-effectiveness studies, SNA was generally cheaper per person tested and per person diagnosed compared to non-SNA. Based on 23 qualitative studies, SNA is likely to be acceptable to a variety of populations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Our review collated evidence for SNA to HIV testing covering the key populations and the general population who may benefit from HIV testing. We summarized evidence for the effectiveness, acceptability and cost-effectiveness of different models of SNA. While we did not identify an ideal model of SNA that could be immediately scaled up, for each setting and population targeted, we recommend various implementation considerations as our meta-analysis showed the effectiveness might differ due to factors which include the testing modality (i.e. use of HIV self-testing), type of test promoters, long or short duration of recruitment and use of financial incentives.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Social network-based approaches may enhance HIV testing uptake, increase the proportion of first-time testers and those testing positive for HIV. Heterogeneity among studies highlights the need for context-specific adaptations, but the overall positive impact of SNA on HIV testing outcomes could support its integration into existing HIV testing services.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International AIDS Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jia2.26353","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International AIDS Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jia2.26353","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Social network-based testing approaches (SNAs) encourage individuals (“test promoters”) to motivate sexual partners and/or those in their social networks to test for HIV. We conducted a systematic review to examine the effectiveness, acceptability and cost-effectiveness of SNA.
Methods
We searched five databases from January 2010 to May 2023, and included studies that compared SNA with non-SNA. We used random-effects meta-analysis to combine effect estimates. Certainty was assessed using the GRADE approach.
Results
We identified 47 studies. SNA may increase uptake of HIV testing compared to non-SNA (RR 2.04, 95% CI: 1.06–3.95, Low certainty). The proportion of first-time testers was probably higher among partners or social contacts of test promoters using SNA compared to non-SNA (RR 1.49, 95% CI: 1.22–1.81, Moderate certainty). The proportion of people who tested positive for HIV may be higher among partners or social contacts of test promoters using SNA compared to non-SNA (RR 1.84, 95% CI: 1.01–3.35, Low certainty). There were no reports of any adverse events or harms associated with SNA. Based on six cost-effectiveness studies, SNA was generally cheaper per person tested and per person diagnosed compared to non-SNA. Based on 23 qualitative studies, SNA is likely to be acceptable to a variety of populations.
Discussion
Our review collated evidence for SNA to HIV testing covering the key populations and the general population who may benefit from HIV testing. We summarized evidence for the effectiveness, acceptability and cost-effectiveness of different models of SNA. While we did not identify an ideal model of SNA that could be immediately scaled up, for each setting and population targeted, we recommend various implementation considerations as our meta-analysis showed the effectiveness might differ due to factors which include the testing modality (i.e. use of HIV self-testing), type of test promoters, long or short duration of recruitment and use of financial incentives.
Conclusions
Social network-based approaches may enhance HIV testing uptake, increase the proportion of first-time testers and those testing positive for HIV. Heterogeneity among studies highlights the need for context-specific adaptations, but the overall positive impact of SNA on HIV testing outcomes could support its integration into existing HIV testing services.
导言 基于社会网络的检测方法(SNA)鼓励个人("检测促进者")动员性伴侣和/或其社会网络中的人进行 HIV 检测。我们对 SNA 的有效性、可接受性和成本效益进行了系统回顾。 方法 我们检索了 2010 年 1 月至 2023 年 5 月期间的五个数据库,并纳入了将 SNA 与非 SNA 进行比较的研究。我们采用随机效应荟萃分析法合并效果估计值。采用 GRADE 方法评估确定性。 结果 我们确定了 47 项研究。与非 SNA 相比,SNA 可增加 HIV 检测的接受率(RR 2.04,95% CI:1.06-3.95,低确定性)。与非 SNA 相比,使用 SNA 的检测推广者的伴侣或社会接触者中首次检测者的比例可能更高(RR 1.49,95% CI:1.22-1.81,中度确定性)。与非 SNA 相比,使用 SNA 的检测推广者的伴侣或社会接触者中 HIV 检测呈阳性的比例可能更高(RR 1.84,95% CI:1.01-3.35,低度确定性)。没有任何与 SNA 相关的不良事件或危害的报告。根据六项成本效益研究,与非 SNA 相比,SNA 的人均检测成本和人均诊断成本普遍较低。根据 23 项定性研究,SNA 有可能为各种人群所接受。 讨论 我们的综述整理了 SNA 用于 HIV 检测的证据,涵盖了可能从 HIV 检测中受益的重点人群和普通人群。我们总结了不同模式的 SNA 的有效性、可接受性和成本效益的证据。虽然我们并没有为每种环境和目标人群确定一种可以立即推广的理想 SNA 模式,但我们建议在实施过程中要考虑各种因素,因为我们的荟萃分析表明,有效性可能会因各种因素而有所不同,这些因素包括检测方式(即使用 HIV 自我检测)、检测推广者的类型、招募时间的长短以及经济激励措施的使用。 结论 基于社会网络的方法可以提高艾滋病检测的接受率,增加首次检测者和艾滋病检测呈阳性者的比例。不同研究之间的差异凸显了根据具体情况进行调整的必要性,但社会网络疗法对艾滋病检测结果的总体积极影响有助于将其纳入现有的艾滋病检测服务中。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the International AIDS Society (JIAS) is a peer-reviewed and Open Access journal for the generation and dissemination of evidence from a wide range of disciplines: basic and biomedical sciences; behavioural sciences; epidemiology; clinical sciences; health economics and health policy; operations research and implementation sciences; and social sciences and humanities. Submission of HIV research carried out in low- and middle-income countries is strongly encouraged.