Comparison of SEM-EDX and ICP-MS for the analysis of gunshot residues after burial: An experimental study

IF 0.8 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Morgan Nguyen-Hong , Bruno Payré , Sébastien Aries , Fabrice Dedouit , Norbert Telmon , Fréderic Savall , Céline Guilbeau-Frugier
{"title":"Comparison of SEM-EDX and ICP-MS for the analysis of gunshot residues after burial: An experimental study","authors":"Morgan Nguyen-Hong ,&nbsp;Bruno Payré ,&nbsp;Sébastien Aries ,&nbsp;Fabrice Dedouit ,&nbsp;Norbert Telmon ,&nbsp;Fréderic Savall ,&nbsp;Céline Guilbeau-Frugier","doi":"10.1016/j.fri.2024.200604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Gunshot residues (GSR) analysis can be valuable in a forensic context for distinguishing entry wounds from exit wounds, especially in cases when body alterations prevent macroscopic analysis. Several studies have demonstrated its usefulness in various contexts. However, few studies have examined the retention of GSR under environmental conditions particularly after burial.</p><p>The primary objective of our experimental study is to investigate the retention of GSR after burial and decomposition by using two techniques: SEM-EDX and ICP-MS. Our secondary objective is to determine whether it is still possible to distinguish the entry wounds from the exit ones after 2 months of burial. For this study, we used a bovine model (cow feet), and fired with 7 mm semi-jacketed bullets. We formed several groups, including 3 control groups that hadn't been shot (buried for 2 days and 60 days and one unburied group), 3 test groups that had been shot (one unburied and two buried that were exhumed after 2 days and 60 days of burial).</p><p>The results of our study show that both SEM-EDX and ICP-MS were suitable for detecting particles characteristic of GSR, after 60 days of burial. However, only SEM-EDX could differentiate easily the entry wounds from the exit ones.</p><p>Our experimental study demonstrates that SEM-EDX analysis is suitable in cases where the discovery of a buried body doesn't allow the macroscopic determination of the ballistic trajectory.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":40763,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Imaging","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 200604"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666225624000289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gunshot residues (GSR) analysis can be valuable in a forensic context for distinguishing entry wounds from exit wounds, especially in cases when body alterations prevent macroscopic analysis. Several studies have demonstrated its usefulness in various contexts. However, few studies have examined the retention of GSR under environmental conditions particularly after burial.

The primary objective of our experimental study is to investigate the retention of GSR after burial and decomposition by using two techniques: SEM-EDX and ICP-MS. Our secondary objective is to determine whether it is still possible to distinguish the entry wounds from the exit ones after 2 months of burial. For this study, we used a bovine model (cow feet), and fired with 7 mm semi-jacketed bullets. We formed several groups, including 3 control groups that hadn't been shot (buried for 2 days and 60 days and one unburied group), 3 test groups that had been shot (one unburied and two buried that were exhumed after 2 days and 60 days of burial).

The results of our study show that both SEM-EDX and ICP-MS were suitable for detecting particles characteristic of GSR, after 60 days of burial. However, only SEM-EDX could differentiate easily the entry wounds from the exit ones.

Our experimental study demonstrates that SEM-EDX analysis is suitable in cases where the discovery of a buried body doesn't allow the macroscopic determination of the ballistic trajectory.

比较 SEM-EDX 和 ICP-MS 对掩埋后枪弹残留物的分析:实验研究
在法医鉴定中,枪弹残留物(GSR)分析对于区分入口伤和出口伤很有价值,尤其是在身体改变无法进行宏观分析的情况下。一些研究已经证明了它在各种情况下的实用性。我们实验研究的主要目的是利用两种技术调查 GSR 在埋葬和分解后的保留情况:我们实验研究的主要目的是利用 SEM-EDX 和 ICP-MS 两种技术研究 GSR 在掩埋和分解后的保留情况。我们的次要目标是确定在掩埋 2 个月后是否仍有可能区分入口伤口和出口伤口。在这项研究中,我们使用了牛模型(牛脚),并使用 7 毫米半套筒子弹进行射击。研究结果表明,SEM-EDX 和 ICP-MS 都适用于检测埋葬 60 天后的 GSR 特征颗粒。我们的实验研究表明,SEM-EDX 分析适用于发现埋葬尸体后无法宏观确定弹道的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forensic Imaging
Forensic Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
27.30%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信