Multilevel integrated healthcare: The evaluation of Project ECHO® networks to integrate children’s healthcare in Australia

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
{"title":"Multilevel integrated healthcare: The evaluation of Project ECHO® networks to integrate children’s healthcare in Australia","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.socnet.2024.08.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present empirical study aims to explore medical knowledge sharing in the Australian healthcare context, aiming to broadly evaluate the potential impact of Project ECHO®, an online mentoring and networking health program. We focus on health-related knowledge sharing practices among the network of professionals through formal and informal channels, and across different health and non-health sectors and organisational systems. Studying knowledge transmission among professional networks is essential for optimizing healthcare delivery, promoting innovation, and providing insights on improvement of patient experiences within the healthcare system. We utilize a multilevel approach to shape our data collection strategy. Employing network measures and Multilevel Exponential Random Graph Models, we aim to explore how advice and knowledge sharing behaviours among healthcare professionals and their institutions are interdependently connected. Then, we incorporate network generated results within an evaluation framework for establishing some aspects of the efficiency of the ECHO program along four pillars: <em>Acceptability</em>, <em>Capability</em>, <em>Reachability</em>, and <em>Integration</em>. Our investigation found that among ECHO members, hierarchy is less pronounced compared to across levels and organizations, with certain individuals emerging as central in advice-sharing. The multilevel network perspective showed complex, informal patterns of knowledge and information sharing, including inter-organizational hierarchy, role and sector homophily, brokerage roles with popularity across health organizations, and connectivity through knowledge-sharing in cross-level small group clusters.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48353,"journal":{"name":"Social Networks","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873324000571/pdfft?md5=32414cf56b2f664ab7030fc6a513dfc4&pid=1-s2.0-S0378873324000571-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Networks","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873324000571","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present empirical study aims to explore medical knowledge sharing in the Australian healthcare context, aiming to broadly evaluate the potential impact of Project ECHO®, an online mentoring and networking health program. We focus on health-related knowledge sharing practices among the network of professionals through formal and informal channels, and across different health and non-health sectors and organisational systems. Studying knowledge transmission among professional networks is essential for optimizing healthcare delivery, promoting innovation, and providing insights on improvement of patient experiences within the healthcare system. We utilize a multilevel approach to shape our data collection strategy. Employing network measures and Multilevel Exponential Random Graph Models, we aim to explore how advice and knowledge sharing behaviours among healthcare professionals and their institutions are interdependently connected. Then, we incorporate network generated results within an evaluation framework for establishing some aspects of the efficiency of the ECHO program along four pillars: Acceptability, Capability, Reachability, and Integration. Our investigation found that among ECHO members, hierarchy is less pronounced compared to across levels and organizations, with certain individuals emerging as central in advice-sharing. The multilevel network perspective showed complex, informal patterns of knowledge and information sharing, including inter-organizational hierarchy, role and sector homophily, brokerage roles with popularity across health organizations, and connectivity through knowledge-sharing in cross-level small group clusters.

多层次综合医疗保健:澳大利亚整合儿童医疗保健的 ECHO® 项目网络评估
本实证研究旨在探索澳大利亚医疗保健领域的医学知识共享,目的是广泛评估 ECHO® 项目(一项在线指导和网络健康计划)的潜在影响。我们将重点放在专业人员网络之间通过正式和非正式渠道,以及在不同的卫生和非卫生部门和组织系统之间的卫生相关知识共享实践上。研究专业网络间的知识传播对于优化医疗保健服务、促进创新以及为改善医疗保健系统内的患者体验提供见解至关重要。我们采用多层次方法来制定数据收集策略。利用网络措施和多层次指数随机图模型,我们旨在探索医疗保健专业人员及其机构之间的建议和知识共享行为是如何相互依存地联系在一起的。然后,我们将网络生成的结果纳入评估框架,根据四大支柱确定 ECHO 计划效率的某些方面:可接受性、能力、可达性和整合性。我们的调查发现,在 ECHO 成员中,与跨级别和跨组织相比,等级制度并不那么明显,某些个人在建议共享中处于核心地位。多层次网络视角显示了复杂的、非正式的知识和信息共享模式,包括组织间的层级关系、角色和部门同亲关系、在各医疗机构中受欢迎的中介角色,以及通过跨层级小组集群的知识共享实现的连接。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Networks
Social Networks Multiple-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
12.90%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Social Networks is an interdisciplinary and international quarterly. It provides a common forum for representatives of anthropology, sociology, history, social psychology, political science, human geography, biology, economics, communications science and other disciplines who share an interest in the study of the empirical structure of social relations and associations that may be expressed in network form. It publishes both theoretical and substantive papers. Critical reviews of major theoretical or methodological approaches using the notion of networks in the analysis of social behaviour are also included, as are reviews of recent books dealing with social networks and social structure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信