Pavol Zahorec , Juraj Papčo , Ema Nogová , Roman Pašteka
{"title":"Vertical gravity gradient in volcano monitoring – In situ measured or theoretical? (Campi Flegrei study)","authors":"Pavol Zahorec , Juraj Papčo , Ema Nogová , Roman Pašteka","doi":"10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2024.108184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We analyse the vertical gravity gradient (VGG) properties at calderas using the Campi Flegrei (CF) site in Italy. In situ observed VGG values can depart significantly from the theoretical (normal) value of −308.6 μGal/m, particularly in areas of rugged relief. It is assumed that in sufficiently flat areas, the effect of geology, i.e., of the subsurface density heterogeneities, on VGG could prevail over the effect of terrain (topography), which can subsequently be neglected. With respect to the CF caldera, which is often considered as ‘reasonably flat area’, according to our findings the effect of topography on VGG is usually underestimated, while the effect of deeper geology is overestimated. We model the effect of the near topography on VGG at CF and subsequently verify the results of modelling by in situ observations to support our predictions. The results show that, in terms of VGG, the topographic relief plays a more significant role than the assumed geological sources even at ‘flat’ calderas such as CF. For a better understanding, in addition to CF, we analyse the effect of deeper geological sources on VGG also in the territory of Slovakia using a detailed gravimetric database of Slovakia. As a result, we question the use of in situ observed VGG values when processing and interpreting observed time-lapse gravity changes in volcanic areas accompanied by surface deformation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54753,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research","volume":"455 ","pages":"Article 108184"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377027324001768","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We analyse the vertical gravity gradient (VGG) properties at calderas using the Campi Flegrei (CF) site in Italy. In situ observed VGG values can depart significantly from the theoretical (normal) value of −308.6 μGal/m, particularly in areas of rugged relief. It is assumed that in sufficiently flat areas, the effect of geology, i.e., of the subsurface density heterogeneities, on VGG could prevail over the effect of terrain (topography), which can subsequently be neglected. With respect to the CF caldera, which is often considered as ‘reasonably flat area’, according to our findings the effect of topography on VGG is usually underestimated, while the effect of deeper geology is overestimated. We model the effect of the near topography on VGG at CF and subsequently verify the results of modelling by in situ observations to support our predictions. The results show that, in terms of VGG, the topographic relief plays a more significant role than the assumed geological sources even at ‘flat’ calderas such as CF. For a better understanding, in addition to CF, we analyse the effect of deeper geological sources on VGG also in the territory of Slovakia using a detailed gravimetric database of Slovakia. As a result, we question the use of in situ observed VGG values when processing and interpreting observed time-lapse gravity changes in volcanic areas accompanied by surface deformation.
期刊介绍:
An international research journal with focus on volcanic and geothermal processes and their impact on the environment and society.
Submission of papers covering the following aspects of volcanology and geothermal research are encouraged:
(1) Geological aspects of volcanic systems: volcano stratigraphy, structure and tectonic influence; eruptive history; evolution of volcanic landforms; eruption style and progress; dispersal patterns of lava and ash; analysis of real-time eruption observations.
(2) Geochemical and petrological aspects of volcanic rocks: magma genesis and evolution; crystallization; volatile compositions, solubility, and degassing; volcanic petrography and textural analysis.
(3) Hydrology, geochemistry and measurement of volcanic and hydrothermal fluids: volcanic gas emissions; fumaroles and springs; crater lakes; hydrothermal mineralization.
(4) Geophysical aspects of volcanic systems: physical properties of volcanic rocks and magmas; heat flow studies; volcano seismology, geodesy and remote sensing.
(5) Computational modeling and experimental simulation of magmatic and hydrothermal processes: eruption dynamics; magma transport and storage; plume dynamics and ash dispersal; lava flow dynamics; hydrothermal fluid flow; thermodynamics of aqueous fluids and melts.
(6) Volcano hazard and risk research: hazard zonation methodology, development of forecasting tools; assessment techniques for vulnerability and impact.