Adequacy of an In–Neonatal Intensive Care Unit 1T Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared With 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Management

IF 3.2 3区医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY

Pediatric neurology Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2024.08.004

Danielle Sharon BS , Elizabeth Singh MSN, CPNP, RN , Camilo Jaimes MD , Ellen Grant MD, MSc , Terrie Inder MBChB, MD , Mohamed El-Dib MD

{"title":"Adequacy of an In–Neonatal Intensive Care Unit 1T Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared With 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Management","authors":"Danielle Sharon BS , Elizabeth Singh MSN, CPNP, RN , Camilo Jaimes MD , Ellen Grant MD, MSc , Terrie Inder MBChB, MD , Mohamed El-Dib MD","doi":"10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2024.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This retrospective study aims to assess the added diagnostic utility and clinical value of a 3-Tesla neonatal brain magnetic resonance imaging after obtaining a 1-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging within the neonatal intensive care unit.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cohort of 34 infants had an initial 1-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and repeat imaging within 14 days in a 3-Tesla scanner. All infants were admitted to the level III neonatal intensive care unit at Brigham and Women's Hospital, and all images were interpreted by pediatric neuroradiologists.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For 31 infants (91%), the 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging showed similar or expected evolution of known findings found on 1 Tesla. For infants with change between the 1-Tesla and 3-Tesla imaging results, there was no clinical impact.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Images from 1-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging were sufficient for characterizing a wide range of neonatal brain injuries and abnormalities and repeated 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging did not yield further clinical benefit.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19956,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric neurology","volume":"161 ","pages":"Pages 34-39"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887899424002881","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This retrospective study aims to assess the added diagnostic utility and clinical value of a 3-Tesla neonatal brain magnetic resonance imaging after obtaining a 1-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging within the neonatal intensive care unit.

Methods

A cohort of 34 infants had an initial 1-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and repeat imaging within 14 days in a 3-Tesla scanner. All infants were admitted to the level III neonatal intensive care unit at Brigham and Women's Hospital, and all images were interpreted by pediatric neuroradiologists.

Results

For 31 infants (91%), the 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging showed similar or expected evolution of known findings found on 1 Tesla. For infants with change between the 1-Tesla and 3-Tesla imaging results, there was no clinical impact.

Conclusion

Images from 1-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging were sufficient for characterizing a wide range of neonatal brain injuries and abnormalities and repeated 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging did not yield further clinical benefit.

查看原文本刊更多论文

新生儿重症监护室 1T 磁共振成像与 3T 磁共振成像在临床管理中的充分性比较

背景这项回顾性研究旨在评估在新生儿重症监护病房进行 1-Tesla 磁共振成像后，3-Tesla 新生儿脑磁共振成像的附加诊断效用和临床价值。方法一组 34 名婴儿在 3-Tesla 扫描仪上进行了首次 1-Tesla 磁共振成像和 14 天内的重复成像。所有婴儿都住进了布里格姆妇女医院的三级新生儿重症监护病房，所有图像都由儿科神经放射专家进行解读。结论1-特斯拉磁共振成像图像足以描述各种新生儿脑损伤和异常，重复 3-特斯拉磁共振成像不会产生进一步的临床益处。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Pediatric neurology 医学-临床神经学

CiteScore

4.80

自引率

2.60%

发文量

176

审稿时长

78 days

期刊介绍： Pediatric Neurology publishes timely peer-reviewed clinical and research articles covering all aspects of the developing nervous system. Pediatric Neurology features up-to-the-minute publication of the latest advances in the diagnosis, management, and treatment of pediatric neurologic disorders. The journal''s editor, E. Steve Roach, in conjunction with the team of Associate Editors, heads an internationally recognized editorial board, ensuring the most authoritative and extensive coverage of the field. Among the topics covered are: epilepsy, mitochondrial diseases, congenital malformations, chromosomopathies, peripheral neuropathies, perinatal and childhood stroke, cerebral palsy, as well as other diseases affecting the developing nervous system.