Muscle mechanical properties of pelvic floor and paravertebral muscles in women with and without urge urinary incontinence: a case-control study

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
{"title":"Muscle mechanical properties of pelvic floor and paravertebral muscles in women with and without urge urinary incontinence: a case-control study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Muscle mechanical properties (MMPs) are relevant in the pathophysiology of lumbopelvic disorders. However, they have not been described in the pelvic floor muscles (PFM) and lumbar paravertebral muscles (LPM) of women with urge urinary incontinence (UUI).</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To identify differences between MMPs of PFM and LPM in patients with UUI and healthy controls. Secondarily also aimed to observe the relationship between sociodemographic and clinical variables with the PFM and LPM MMPs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The participants of this case-control study comprised 34 women with UUI (UUI group) and 34 continent women (control group). Sociodemographic variables were obtained together with data on the clinical status of the pelvic floor. The MMPs, i.e., frequency (tone), stiffness, decrement (inverse of elasticity), and viscoelastic properties (VP), such as relaxation time and creep, of PFM and LPM were assessed with a hand-held tonometer. Between-group differences and intra-group correlations were identified.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The UUI group presented higher frequency and stiffness, as well as lower relaxation time in PFM, whereas the LPM had lower tone and stiffness, and higher VP, compared to the control group (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). The UUI group showed a pattern of moderate correlations (|0.403|&lt;r&lt;|0.600|) among all MMPs of PFM and tone, stiffness, and VP of LPM, which did not appear in the control group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The presence of UUI may influence MMPs at PFM and LPM levels, increasing the tone and stiffness of PFM, whereas these properties are reduced in LPM. These findings emphasize the clinical interest of the lumbopelvic determination of MMPs, obtained through externally applied hand-held instruments, in the pathophysiology of UUI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49621,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1413355524005240/pdfft?md5=7ba58fb3b7129c37980efe8976630d3a&pid=1-s2.0-S1413355524005240-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1413355524005240","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Muscle mechanical properties (MMPs) are relevant in the pathophysiology of lumbopelvic disorders. However, they have not been described in the pelvic floor muscles (PFM) and lumbar paravertebral muscles (LPM) of women with urge urinary incontinence (UUI).

Objective

To identify differences between MMPs of PFM and LPM in patients with UUI and healthy controls. Secondarily also aimed to observe the relationship between sociodemographic and clinical variables with the PFM and LPM MMPs.

Methods

The participants of this case-control study comprised 34 women with UUI (UUI group) and 34 continent women (control group). Sociodemographic variables were obtained together with data on the clinical status of the pelvic floor. The MMPs, i.e., frequency (tone), stiffness, decrement (inverse of elasticity), and viscoelastic properties (VP), such as relaxation time and creep, of PFM and LPM were assessed with a hand-held tonometer. Between-group differences and intra-group correlations were identified.

Results

The UUI group presented higher frequency and stiffness, as well as lower relaxation time in PFM, whereas the LPM had lower tone and stiffness, and higher VP, compared to the control group (p < 0.05). The UUI group showed a pattern of moderate correlations (|0.403|<r<|0.600|) among all MMPs of PFM and tone, stiffness, and VP of LPM, which did not appear in the control group.

Conclusion

The presence of UUI may influence MMPs at PFM and LPM levels, increasing the tone and stiffness of PFM, whereas these properties are reduced in LPM. These findings emphasize the clinical interest of the lumbopelvic determination of MMPs, obtained through externally applied hand-held instruments, in the pathophysiology of UUI.

有急迫性尿失禁和无急迫性尿失禁妇女盆底肌和椎旁肌的肌肉机械特性:病例对照研究
背景肌肉机械特性(MMPs)与腰椎骨盆疾病的病理生理学相关。目的 确定急迫性尿失禁(UUI)患者和健康对照组的盆底肌(PFM)和腰椎旁肌(LPM)的肌肉机械特性之间的差异。其次,还旨在观察社会人口学和临床变量与 PFM 和 LPM MMPs 之间的关系。方法这项病例对照研究的参与者包括 34 名尿失禁女性(尿失禁组)和 34 名无尿失禁女性(对照组)。研究人员收集了社会人口学变量和盆底临床状况数据。使用手持式声压计评估了盆底肌肉和盆底肌张力指数(MMPs),即频率(声调)、硬度、递减(弹性的倒数)和粘弹性(VP),如松弛时间和蠕变。结果与对照组相比,UUI 组的频率和硬度较高,PFM 的松弛时间较短,而 LPM 的张力和硬度较低,VP 较高(p <0.05)。UUI 组显示 PFM 的所有 MMPs 与 LPM 的张力、僵硬度和 VP 之间存在中度相关性(|0.403|<r<|0.600|),而对照组则没有。这些发现强调了通过外部手持仪器测定腰椎 MMPs 在 UUI 病理生理学中的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
8.80%
发文量
53
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy (BJPT) is the official publication of the Brazilian Society of Physical Therapy Research and Graduate Studies (ABRAPG-Ft). It publishes original research articles on topics related to the areas of physical therapy and rehabilitation sciences, including clinical, basic or applied studies on the assessment, prevention, and treatment of movement disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信