Coaching third parties for suicide prevention.

The Behavior therapist Pub Date : 2024-07-01
Lily A Brown, Cindy Swinkels, Crystal Barnes, Alexis May, Stephanie Daniel, Michael Hill, Dev Crasta, Marianne Goodman, Steven L Sayers
{"title":"Coaching third parties for suicide prevention.","authors":"Lily A Brown, Cindy Swinkels, Crystal Barnes, Alexis May, Stephanie Daniel, Michael Hill, Dev Crasta, Marianne Goodman, Steven L Sayers","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Concerned allies often call crisis lines and other call centers about their loved ones' mental health. Callers to Coaching Into Care, a non-crisis call center, often report concerns about suicide risk in Veterans yet little is known about how best to support those callers. We conducted a documentation review to understand standard operating procedures, barriers, and opportunities for risk reduction.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Across 1,581 unique callers with an initial call over a 6 month period, 225 callers (14.2%) were identified for contact note review and coding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Calls were frequently characterized by current suicidal ideation (62.7%), suicide attempts (24.0%), and access to lethal means (35.6%), although use of lethal means safety interventions was infrequently documented (12.9%). The majority of callers were coded as open to intervention (83.4%). After coaching, 16% of Veterans who were previously not connected to mental health care had connected to care in the community or VA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was substantial heterogeneity in assessments and interventions used, particularly related to documentation of access to lethal means; however, there is an opportunity to provide risk reduction education and communication skill building for family and friends of Veterans. Those closest to Veterans report being open to learning new ways to engage with Veterans around safety and mental wellness.</p>","PeriodicalId":74953,"journal":{"name":"The Behavior therapist","volume":"47 5","pages":"247-255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376349/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Behavior therapist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Concerned allies often call crisis lines and other call centers about their loved ones' mental health. Callers to Coaching Into Care, a non-crisis call center, often report concerns about suicide risk in Veterans yet little is known about how best to support those callers. We conducted a documentation review to understand standard operating procedures, barriers, and opportunities for risk reduction.

Method: Across 1,581 unique callers with an initial call over a 6 month period, 225 callers (14.2%) were identified for contact note review and coding.

Results: Calls were frequently characterized by current suicidal ideation (62.7%), suicide attempts (24.0%), and access to lethal means (35.6%), although use of lethal means safety interventions was infrequently documented (12.9%). The majority of callers were coded as open to intervention (83.4%). After coaching, 16% of Veterans who were previously not connected to mental health care had connected to care in the community or VA.

Conclusions: There was substantial heterogeneity in assessments and interventions used, particularly related to documentation of access to lethal means; however, there is an opportunity to provide risk reduction education and communication skill building for family and friends of Veterans. Those closest to Veterans report being open to learning new ways to engage with Veterans around safety and mental wellness.

指导第三方预防自杀。
目的:关心退伍军人的盟友经常会拨打危机热线或其他呼叫中心,询问其亲人的精神健康状况。非危机呼叫中心 Coaching Into Care 的来电者经常报告退伍军人的自杀风险问题,但人们对如何为这些来电者提供最佳支持却知之甚少。我们对文件进行了审查,以了解标准操作程序、障碍和降低风险的机会:方法:在 6 个月的时间里,我们对 1581 位首次来电的退伍军人进行了调查,其中 225 位(14.2%)被确定为联系记录审查和编码对象:来电者经常有自杀倾向(62.7%)、自杀未遂(24.0%)和获得致命手段(35.6%),但使用致命手段安全干预的记录并不多(12.9%)。大多数来电者被编码为愿意接受干预(83.4%)。经过辅导后,16% 以前未接受过心理健康护理的退伍军人接受了社区或退伍军人事务部的护理:在评估和所使用的干预措施方面存在很大的差异,尤其是在记录获得致命手段的途径方面;但是,为退伍军人的家人和朋友提供降低风险教育和沟通技能培养是有机会的。与退伍军人关系最密切的人表示愿意学习新的方法,与退伍军人就安全和心理健康问题进行沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信