Comparing independent prescribing to patient group direction use in a general practitioner out-of-hours service: a retrospective cross-sectional service evaluation.

Hayley Stevens, Beryl Mansel, Jayne Cutter
{"title":"Comparing independent prescribing to patient group direction use in a general practitioner out-of-hours service: a retrospective cross-sectional service evaluation.","authors":"Hayley Stevens, Beryl Mansel, Jayne Cutter","doi":"10.29045/14784726.2024.9.9.2.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Global demand for healthcare is escalating, prompting exploration of innovative strategies to augment service capacity. Independent prescribing (IP) helps to address this challenge, allowing non-medical professionals to prescribe medication. Paramedics in the UK were granted prescribing privileges in 2018, yet uptake remains low. Despite qualitative evidence indicating that paramedic prescribing is beneficial, quantitative comparisons of medication provision between prescribers and non-prescribers are lacking. Paramedics provide patients with non-emergency medication by three different routes: IP, using a patient group direction (PGD) or with prescriber support.Advanced paramedic practitioners who are not qualified as independent prescribers, rotating through ambulance and general practitioner out-of-hours services, offered an opportunity to quantitatively compare medication supply.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study compares medication supply by three advanced paramedic practitioners using PGDs with three prescribing nurses in a Welsh general practitioner out-of-hours service. A cross-sectional design was employed to retrospectively review electronic patient clinical records between 1 December 2019 and 30 November 2020, including patients presenting with one of five generalised clinical conditions (urinary, soft tissue, respiratory, abdominal pain, ear). Descriptive analysis and non-parametric tests compared medications prescribed or supplied, how patients received medication and reasons for seeking prescriber support.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 397 patient records were analysed. Paramedics supplied medications more frequently with prescriber support (68.2%) than via PGD (27.9%). Nurses predominantly prescribed medication independently (99.3%). Medication provision was comparable when paramedics had prescriber support. Reasons for paramedic support-seeking included having no PGD available (34.1%) and PGD being excluded from use (28.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Advanced paramedic practitioner medication supply using PGDs and prescriber support was comparable to that of prescribing nurse colleagues. However, autonomy restrictions highlight the need for paramedic prescribing in services where prescriber availability is limited. Further research evaluating the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of PGD use versus IP is necessary. Additionally, the qualitative benefits of IP, such as improved patient care and satisfaction, warrant due consideration when implementing future healthcare strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":72470,"journal":{"name":"British paramedic journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376321/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British paramedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2024.9.9.2.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Global demand for healthcare is escalating, prompting exploration of innovative strategies to augment service capacity. Independent prescribing (IP) helps to address this challenge, allowing non-medical professionals to prescribe medication. Paramedics in the UK were granted prescribing privileges in 2018, yet uptake remains low. Despite qualitative evidence indicating that paramedic prescribing is beneficial, quantitative comparisons of medication provision between prescribers and non-prescribers are lacking. Paramedics provide patients with non-emergency medication by three different routes: IP, using a patient group direction (PGD) or with prescriber support.Advanced paramedic practitioners who are not qualified as independent prescribers, rotating through ambulance and general practitioner out-of-hours services, offered an opportunity to quantitatively compare medication supply.

Methods: This study compares medication supply by three advanced paramedic practitioners using PGDs with three prescribing nurses in a Welsh general practitioner out-of-hours service. A cross-sectional design was employed to retrospectively review electronic patient clinical records between 1 December 2019 and 30 November 2020, including patients presenting with one of five generalised clinical conditions (urinary, soft tissue, respiratory, abdominal pain, ear). Descriptive analysis and non-parametric tests compared medications prescribed or supplied, how patients received medication and reasons for seeking prescriber support.

Results: A total of 397 patient records were analysed. Paramedics supplied medications more frequently with prescriber support (68.2%) than via PGD (27.9%). Nurses predominantly prescribed medication independently (99.3%). Medication provision was comparable when paramedics had prescriber support. Reasons for paramedic support-seeking included having no PGD available (34.1%) and PGD being excluded from use (28.4%).

Conclusions: Advanced paramedic practitioner medication supply using PGDs and prescriber support was comparable to that of prescribing nurse colleagues. However, autonomy restrictions highlight the need for paramedic prescribing in services where prescriber availability is limited. Further research evaluating the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of PGD use versus IP is necessary. Additionally, the qualitative benefits of IP, such as improved patient care and satisfaction, warrant due consideration when implementing future healthcare strategies.

比较全科医生非工作时间服务中的独立处方与患者小组指导的使用情况:一项回顾性横断面服务评估。
导言:全球对医疗保健的需求不断攀升,这促使人们探索创新战略来提高服务能力。独立处方(IP)有助于应对这一挑战,允许非医疗专业人员开具处方。2018 年,英国的辅助医务人员获得了处方权,但使用率仍然很低。尽管定性证据表明辅助医务人员开处方是有益的,但却缺乏开处方者与非开处方者之间药物供应的定量比较。辅助医务人员通过三种不同途径为患者提供非急诊药物:没有独立处方资格的高级辅助医务人员在救护车和全科医生的非工作时间服务中轮流工作,这为定量比较药物供应提供了机会:本研究比较了威尔士一家全科医生非工作时间服务机构中使用 PGD 的三名高级辅助医务人员与三名开处方的护士的药物供应情况。研究采用横断面设计,回顾性审查了 2019 年 12 月 1 日至 2020 年 11 月 30 日期间患者的电子临床记录,包括出现五种全身性临床症状(泌尿系统、软组织、呼吸系统、腹痛、耳部)之一的患者。描述性分析和非参数检验比较了处方或提供的药物、患者接受药物治疗的方式以及寻求处方支持的原因:共分析了 397 份患者记录。辅助医务人员在处方支持下提供药物的比例(68.2%)高于通过PGD提供药物的比例(27.9%)。护士主要是独立开药(99.3%)。在护理人员获得处方支持的情况下,用药情况相当。辅助医务人员寻求支持的原因包括没有可用的 PGD(34.1%)和 PGD 无法使用(28.4%):结论:使用 PGD 和处方支持的高级护理人员药物供应与开处方的护士同事相当。然而,自主权的限制凸显了在开处方人员有限的服务机构中辅助医务人员开处方的必要性。有必要开展进一步研究,评估使用 PGD 与使用 IP 的效率和成本效益。此外,在实施未来的医疗保健战略时,IP 的质量效益(如改善患者护理和满意度)也值得充分考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信