Surgical options and clinical outcomes following a failed Latarjet procedure: a systematic review.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2024.07.031
Neil Sarna, Jaydeep Dhillon, James A Maguire, Anthony J Scillia, Matthew J Kraeutler
{"title":"Surgical options and clinical outcomes following a failed Latarjet procedure: a systematic review.","authors":"Neil Sarna, Jaydeep Dhillon, James A Maguire, Anthony J Scillia, Matthew J Kraeutler","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.07.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A failed prior Latarjet procedure can be a challenging situation for both patients and surgeons. The purpose of this study was to report on the techniques and outcomes of patients undergoing revision surgery for the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder instability after a failed Latarjet procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify clinical studies which reported on surgical techniques for a failed Latarjet procedure with reporting of clinical outcomes. The search terms used were Latarjet failed. Patients were evaluated based on revision method, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), reoperation rates, recurrent instability, overall satisfaction, and return to sports and work.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies (all Level IV evidence) met inclusion criteria, including a total of 293 shoulders with a mean age of 28.3 years (range, 16-55 years) at the time of surgery. The mean follow-up time was 50.4 months (range, 14.0-208.0 months) and males accounted for 78.6% of all patients. Revision procedures included open and arthroscopic Eden-Hybinette, distal tibial allograft, iliac crest autograft, osteochondral glenoid allograft, and Bankart repair and/or capsular plication. These may all be viable techniques for revision surgery for a failed Latarjet procedure. All revision procedures showed improvements in PROMs including the Visual Analogue Scale, Constant score, subjective shoulder value, Walch-Duplay, and Rowe scores. Return to sports ranged from 46.1% to 94%. Recurrent instability rates ranged from 0% to 43.8%. Reoperation rates ranged from 0% to 31.3%. Overall satisfaction following a revision procedure ranged from 80% to 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A failed Latarjet procedure can be treated with various revision procedures such as open and arthroscopic Eden-Hybinette, distal tibial allograft, iliac crest autograft, osteochondral glenoid allograft, and Bankart repair and/or capsular plication. Overall, surgical management of the failed Latarjet results in improvements in PROMs, pain, return to sports, and decreased recurrent instability with a moderate complication rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.07.031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A failed prior Latarjet procedure can be a challenging situation for both patients and surgeons. The purpose of this study was to report on the techniques and outcomes of patients undergoing revision surgery for the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder instability after a failed Latarjet procedure.

Methods: A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify clinical studies which reported on surgical techniques for a failed Latarjet procedure with reporting of clinical outcomes. The search terms used were Latarjet failed. Patients were evaluated based on revision method, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), reoperation rates, recurrent instability, overall satisfaction, and return to sports and work.

Results: Thirteen studies (all Level IV evidence) met inclusion criteria, including a total of 293 shoulders with a mean age of 28.3 years (range, 16-55 years) at the time of surgery. The mean follow-up time was 50.4 months (range, 14.0-208.0 months) and males accounted for 78.6% of all patients. Revision procedures included open and arthroscopic Eden-Hybinette, distal tibial allograft, iliac crest autograft, osteochondral glenoid allograft, and Bankart repair and/or capsular plication. These may all be viable techniques for revision surgery for a failed Latarjet procedure. All revision procedures showed improvements in PROMs including the Visual Analogue Scale, Constant score, subjective shoulder value, Walch-Duplay, and Rowe scores. Return to sports ranged from 46.1% to 94%. Recurrent instability rates ranged from 0% to 43.8%. Reoperation rates ranged from 0% to 31.3%. Overall satisfaction following a revision procedure ranged from 80% to 100%.

Conclusion: A failed Latarjet procedure can be treated with various revision procedures such as open and arthroscopic Eden-Hybinette, distal tibial allograft, iliac crest autograft, osteochondral glenoid allograft, and Bankart repair and/or capsular plication. Overall, surgical management of the failed Latarjet results in improvements in PROMs, pain, return to sports, and decreased recurrent instability with a moderate complication rate.

Latarjet 手术失败后的手术选择和临床结果:系统回顾
背景:对于患者和外科医生来说,Latarjet手术失败都是一种挑战。本研究旨在报告Latarjet手术失败后接受翻修手术治疗复发性肩关节前侧不稳定患者的技术和结果:方法:通过检索PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和Embase进行了系统性回顾,以确定报告Latarjet手术失败后的手术技术和临床结果的临床研究。使用的检索词包括Latarjet 失败。根据翻修方法、患者报告结果指标(PROMs)、再次手术率、复发不稳定性、总体满意度以及恢复运动和工作情况对患者进行评估:13项研究(均为IV级证据)符合纳入标准,共包括293个肩关节,手术时的平均年龄为28.3岁(16-55岁)。平均随访时间为 50.4 个月(14.0-208.0 个月),男性占所有患者的 78.6%。翻修手术包括开放式和关节镜Eden-Hybinette、胫骨远端同种异体移植、髂嵴自体移植、骨软骨盂同种异体移植、Bankart修复和/或关节囊成形术。这些都是针对拉塔杰特手术失败进行翻修手术的可行技术。所有翻修手术都改善了PROMs,包括VAS(视觉模拟量表)、Constant评分、肩部主观价值(SSV)、Walch-Duplay和Rowe评分。运动恢复率从46.1%到94%不等。复发不稳定率从0%到43.8%不等。再次手术率从0%到31.3%不等。翻修手术后的总体满意度从80%到100%不等:结论:Latarjet手术失败可采用多种翻修手术治疗,如开放和关节镜Eden-Hybinette、胫骨远端异体移植、髂嵴自体移植、骨软骨盂异体移植、Bankart修复和/或关节囊成形术。总体而言,对失败的 Latarjet 进行手术治疗可改善 PROMs、疼痛、恢复运动,并减少复发性不稳定性,并发症发生率适中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信