Targeted Broader Sharing for Liver Continuous Distribution.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Michal A Mankowski, Nicholas L Wood, Allan B Massie, Dorry L Segev, Nikolaos Trichakis, Sommer E Gentry
{"title":"Targeted Broader Sharing for Liver Continuous Distribution.","authors":"Michal A Mankowski, Nicholas L Wood, Allan B Massie, Dorry L Segev, Nikolaos Trichakis, Sommer E Gentry","doi":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, changes to US organ allocation have aimed to improve equity and accessibility across regions. The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network plans to adopt continuous liver distribution, prioritizing candidates based on a weighted composite allocation score (CAS) incorporating proximity, ABO types, medical urgency, and pediatric priority. The Liver Committee has requested research on CAS variations that account for geographical heterogenicity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We describe a method for designing a geographically heterogeneous CAS with targeted broader sharing (CAS-TBS) to balance the highly variable geographic distributions of liver transplant listings and liver donations. CAS-TBS assigns each donor hospital to either broader sharing or nearby sharing, adjusting donor-candidate distance allocation points accordingly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that to reduce geographic disparity in the median Model for End-stage Liver Disease at transplant (MMaT), >75% of livers recovered in regions 2 and 10 should be distributed with broader sharing, whereas 95% of livers recovered in regions 5 and 1 should be distributed with nearby sharing. In a 3-y simulation of liver allocation, CAS-TBS decreased MMaT by 2.1 points in high-MMaT areas such as region 5 while increasing MMaT only by 0.65 points in low-MMaT areas such as region 3. CAS-TBS significantly decreased median transport distance from 202 to 167 nautical miles under acuity circles and decreased waitlist deaths.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our CAS-TBS design methodology could be applied to design geographically heterogeneous allocation scores that reflect transplant community values and priorities within the continuous distribution project of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. In our simulations, the incremental benefit of CAS-TBS over CAS was modest.</p>","PeriodicalId":23316,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000005184","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In recent years, changes to US organ allocation have aimed to improve equity and accessibility across regions. The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network plans to adopt continuous liver distribution, prioritizing candidates based on a weighted composite allocation score (CAS) incorporating proximity, ABO types, medical urgency, and pediatric priority. The Liver Committee has requested research on CAS variations that account for geographical heterogenicity.

Methods: We describe a method for designing a geographically heterogeneous CAS with targeted broader sharing (CAS-TBS) to balance the highly variable geographic distributions of liver transplant listings and liver donations. CAS-TBS assigns each donor hospital to either broader sharing or nearby sharing, adjusting donor-candidate distance allocation points accordingly.

Results: We found that to reduce geographic disparity in the median Model for End-stage Liver Disease at transplant (MMaT), >75% of livers recovered in regions 2 and 10 should be distributed with broader sharing, whereas 95% of livers recovered in regions 5 and 1 should be distributed with nearby sharing. In a 3-y simulation of liver allocation, CAS-TBS decreased MMaT by 2.1 points in high-MMaT areas such as region 5 while increasing MMaT only by 0.65 points in low-MMaT areas such as region 3. CAS-TBS significantly decreased median transport distance from 202 to 167 nautical miles under acuity circles and decreased waitlist deaths.

Conclusions: Our CAS-TBS design methodology could be applied to design geographically heterogeneous allocation scores that reflect transplant community values and priorities within the continuous distribution project of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. In our simulations, the incremental benefit of CAS-TBS over CAS was modest.

有针对性的广泛共享,实现肝脏的持续分配。
背景:近年来,美国的器官分配改革旨在提高各地区的公平性和可及性。器官获取与移植网络计划采用连续的肝脏分配方式,根据加权综合分配分数(CAS),结合邻近程度、ABO血型、医疗紧迫性和儿科优先级,确定候选者的优先级。肝脏委员会要求对考虑地域异质性的 CAS 变化进行研究:方法:我们介绍了一种设计具有针对性更广泛共享的地域异质性CAS(CAS-TBS)的方法,以平衡肝移植列表和肝脏捐赠的地域分布的高度差异性。CAS-TBS将每家捐献医院分配给更广泛共享或就近共享,并相应调整捐献者-候选者距离分配点:结果:我们发现,为了减少终末期肝病移植中位数模型(MMaT)中的地域差异,在第 2 和第 10 地区回收的肝脏中,超过 75% 的肝脏应分配给更广泛的共享,而在第 5 和第 1 地区回收的肝脏中,95% 的肝脏应分配给就近共享。在为期 3 年的肝脏分配模拟中,CAS-TBS 使第 5 区等高 MMaT 地区的 MMaT 下降了 2.1 个百分点,而第 3 区等低 MMaT 地区的 MMaT 仅上升了 0.65 个百分点。CAS-TBS大大减少了敏锐圈下的中位运送距离,从202海里减少到167海里,并减少了等待名单上的死亡人数:我们的 CAS-TBS 设计方法可用于在器官获取与移植网络的连续分配项目中设计反映移植社区价值和优先事项的地域异质性分配分数。在我们的模拟中,CAS-TBS 比 CAS 的增量效益并不高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplantation
Transplantation 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.30%
发文量
1906
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of The Transplantation Society, and the International Liver Transplantation Society, Transplantation is published monthly and is the most cited and influential journal in the field, with more than 25,000 citations per year. Transplantation has been the trusted source for extensive and timely coverage of the most important advances in transplantation for over 50 years. The Editors and Editorial Board are an international group of research and clinical leaders that includes many pioneers of the field, representing a diverse range of areas of expertise. This capable editorial team provides thoughtful and thorough peer review, and delivers rapid, careful and insightful editorial evaluation of all manuscripts submitted to the journal. Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The journal remains competitive with a time to first decision of fewer than 21 days. Transplantation was the first in the field to offer CME credit to its peer reviewers for reviews completed. The journal publishes original research articles in original clinical science and original basic science. Short reports bring attention to research at the forefront of the field. Other areas covered include cell therapy and islet transplantation, immunobiology and genomics, and xenotransplantation. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信