Impact of Social Risk Screening on Discharge Care Processes and Postdischarge Outcomes: A Pragmatic Mixed-Methods Clinical Trial During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Medical Care Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000002048
Andrea S Wallace, Alycia A Bristol, Erin Phinney Johnson, Catherine E Elmore, Sonja E Raaum, Angela Presson, Kaleb Eppich, Mackenzie Elliott, Sumin Park, Benjamin S Brooke, Sumin Park, Marianne E Weiss
{"title":"Impact of Social Risk Screening on Discharge Care Processes and Postdischarge Outcomes: A Pragmatic Mixed-Methods Clinical Trial During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Andrea S Wallace, Alycia A Bristol, Erin Phinney Johnson, Catherine E Elmore, Sonja E Raaum, Angela Presson, Kaleb Eppich, Mackenzie Elliott, Sumin Park, Benjamin S Brooke, Sumin Park, Marianne E Weiss","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social risk screening during inpatient care is required in new CMS regulations, yet its impact on inpatient care and patient outcomes is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate whether implementing a social risk screening protocol improves discharge processes, patient-reported outcomes, and 30-day service use.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>Pragmatic mixed-methods clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Overall, 4130 patient discharges (2383 preimplementation and 1747 postimplementation) from general medicine and surgical services at a 528-bed academic medical center in the Intermountain United States and 15 attending physicians.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Documented family interaction, late discharge, patient-reported readiness for hospital discharge and postdischarge coping difficulties, readmission and emergency department visits within 30 days postdischarge, and coded interviews with inpatient physicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A multivariable segmented regression model indicated a 19% decrease per month in odds of family interaction following intervention implementation (OR=0.81, 95% CI=0.76-0.86, P<0.001), and an additional model found a 32% decrease in odds of being discharged after 2 pm (OR=0.68, 95% CI=0.53-0.87, P=0.003). There were no postimplementation changes in patient-reported discharge readiness, postdischarge coping difficulties, or 30-day hospital readmissions, or ED visits. Physicians expressed concerns about the appropriateness, acceptability, and feasibility of the structured social risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Conducted in the immediate post-COVID timeframe, reduction in family interaction, earlier discharge, and provider concerns with structured social risk assessments likely contributed to the lack of intervention impact on patient outcomes. To be effective, social risk screening will require patient/family and care team codesign its structure and processes, and allocation of resources to assist in addressing identified social risk needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":18364,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11373892/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social risk screening during inpatient care is required in new CMS regulations, yet its impact on inpatient care and patient outcomes is unknown.

Objectives: To evaluate whether implementing a social risk screening protocol improves discharge processes, patient-reported outcomes, and 30-day service use.

Research design: Pragmatic mixed-methods clinical trial.

Subjects: Overall, 4130 patient discharges (2383 preimplementation and 1747 postimplementation) from general medicine and surgical services at a 528-bed academic medical center in the Intermountain United States and 15 attending physicians.

Measures: Documented family interaction, late discharge, patient-reported readiness for hospital discharge and postdischarge coping difficulties, readmission and emergency department visits within 30 days postdischarge, and coded interviews with inpatient physicians.

Results: A multivariable segmented regression model indicated a 19% decrease per month in odds of family interaction following intervention implementation (OR=0.81, 95% CI=0.76-0.86, P<0.001), and an additional model found a 32% decrease in odds of being discharged after 2 pm (OR=0.68, 95% CI=0.53-0.87, P=0.003). There were no postimplementation changes in patient-reported discharge readiness, postdischarge coping difficulties, or 30-day hospital readmissions, or ED visits. Physicians expressed concerns about the appropriateness, acceptability, and feasibility of the structured social risk assessment.

Conclusions: Conducted in the immediate post-COVID timeframe, reduction in family interaction, earlier discharge, and provider concerns with structured social risk assessments likely contributed to the lack of intervention impact on patient outcomes. To be effective, social risk screening will require patient/family and care team codesign its structure and processes, and allocation of resources to assist in addressing identified social risk needs.

社会风险筛查对出院护理流程和出院后结果的影响:在 COVID-19 大流行期间进行的务实混合方法临床试验。
背景:CMS 新规定要求在住院治疗期间进行社会风险筛查,但其对住院治疗和患者预后的影响尚不清楚:CMS 新法规要求在住院治疗期间进行社会风险筛查,但其对住院治疗和患者预后的影响尚不清楚:评估社会风险筛查方案的实施是否能改善出院流程、患者报告的结果以及 30 天的服务使用情况:研究设计:务实的混合方法临床试验:美国山间地区一家拥有 528 张病床的学术医疗中心的普通内科和外科服务机构的 4130 名出院患者(实施前 2383 名,实施后 1747 名)和 15 名主治医生:测量指标:有记录的家庭互动、延迟出院、患者报告的出院准备情况和出院后的应对困难、出院后 30 天内的再入院和急诊就诊情况,以及对住院医生的编码访谈:多变量分段回归模型显示,干预措施实施后,家庭互动的几率每月降低了19%(OR=0.81,95% CI=0.76-0.86,PC结论):COVID刚结束时,家庭互动的减少、出院时间的提前以及医疗服务提供者对结构化社会风险评估的担忧可能是导致干预对患者预后缺乏影响的原因。社会风险筛查要想取得成效,需要患者/家属和护理团队共同设计其结构和流程,并分配资源以协助解决已识别的社会风险需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Care
Medical Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
228
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rated as one of the top ten journals in healthcare administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of healthcare. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of healthcare. This timely journal reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信