General practitioners’ views and experiences of postpartum contraception counselling and provision: a qualitative–descriptive study

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jenna K Perkins, Sharon James, Danielle Mazza, Jessica R Botfield
{"title":"General practitioners’ views and experiences of postpartum contraception counselling and provision: a qualitative–descriptive study","authors":"Jenna K Perkins,&nbsp;Sharon James,&nbsp;Danielle Mazza,&nbsp;Jessica R Botfield","doi":"10.5694/mja2.52438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To explore Australian general practitioners’ views and experiences of undertaking postpartum contraception counselling and provision during the 6–8-week postnatal check.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study design</h3>\n \n <p>Qualitative–descriptive study; semi-structured online interviews.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants, setting</h3>\n \n <p>General practitioners who provide postnatal care in Australian primary health care, recruited using purposive, convenience, and snowball methods, 16 June – 6 July 2023.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main outcome measures</h3>\n \n <p>Views and experiences of postpartum contraception counselling and provision.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-three general practitioners from six states were interviewed; the mean interview time was 30 minutes (range, 21–47 minutes), twenty-two participants were women, and twenty-one worked in metropolitan areas. All participants provide postnatal checks and had the training and facilities needed for providing contraceptive implant insertions. Twelve participants had training in intrauterine device (IUD) insertion, and twenty-one worked in practices with facilities for IUD insertions. Three themes were constructed: views and preferences regarding postnatal contraception counselling; postpartum provision of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC); and opportunities for improving postpartum contraception care in general practice. While most participants recommended LARC methods at postnatal checks, only twelve were trained to insert IUDs. Time constraints, limited access to training, limited financial support, and the lack of guidelines for postnatal checks and contraception care were seen as impeding postpartum contraception counselling. Participants highlighted the importance of access to education and training, appropriate remuneration for general practitioners, multidisciplinary collaboration among health professionals, the inclusion of practice nurses, and raising awareness among mothers of the importance of postnatal checks and postpartum contraception care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>General practitioners are well placed to facilitate discussions about contraception with women who have recently given birth. Postpartum contraception care in general practice could be improved by better access to contraception training, appropriate remuneration for contraception procedures, greater multidisciplinary collaboration, and national postnatal check and postpartum contraception guidelines.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18214,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Australia","volume":"221 7","pages":"381-385"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.52438","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.52438","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To explore Australian general practitioners’ views and experiences of undertaking postpartum contraception counselling and provision during the 6–8-week postnatal check.

Study design

Qualitative–descriptive study; semi-structured online interviews.

Participants, setting

General practitioners who provide postnatal care in Australian primary health care, recruited using purposive, convenience, and snowball methods, 16 June – 6 July 2023.

Main outcome measures

Views and experiences of postpartum contraception counselling and provision.

Results

Twenty-three general practitioners from six states were interviewed; the mean interview time was 30 minutes (range, 21–47 minutes), twenty-two participants were women, and twenty-one worked in metropolitan areas. All participants provide postnatal checks and had the training and facilities needed for providing contraceptive implant insertions. Twelve participants had training in intrauterine device (IUD) insertion, and twenty-one worked in practices with facilities for IUD insertions. Three themes were constructed: views and preferences regarding postnatal contraception counselling; postpartum provision of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC); and opportunities for improving postpartum contraception care in general practice. While most participants recommended LARC methods at postnatal checks, only twelve were trained to insert IUDs. Time constraints, limited access to training, limited financial support, and the lack of guidelines for postnatal checks and contraception care were seen as impeding postpartum contraception counselling. Participants highlighted the importance of access to education and training, appropriate remuneration for general practitioners, multidisciplinary collaboration among health professionals, the inclusion of practice nurses, and raising awareness among mothers of the importance of postnatal checks and postpartum contraception care.

Conclusion

General practitioners are well placed to facilitate discussions about contraception with women who have recently given birth. Postpartum contraception care in general practice could be improved by better access to contraception training, appropriate remuneration for contraception procedures, greater multidisciplinary collaboration, and national postnatal check and postpartum contraception guidelines.

全科医生对产后避孕咨询和服务的看法和经验:一项定性描述研究。
目的: 探讨澳大利亚全科医生对产后 6-8 周产后检查中提供产后避孕咨询的看法和经验:探讨澳大利亚全科医生在产后6-8周检查期间提供产后避孕咨询的观点和经验:定性描述研究;半结构化在线访谈:主要结果测量:结果:对来自六个州的 23 名全科医生进行了访谈;平均访谈时间为 30 分钟(21-47 分钟不等),22 名参与者为女性,21 名在大都市工作。所有参与者都提供产后检查,并接受过提供避孕植入物所需的培训和设施。有 12 名参与者接受过宫内节育器(IUD)放置的培训,21 名参与者在有宫内节育器放置设施的诊所工作。我们构建了三个主题:关于产后避孕咨询的观点和偏好;产后长效可逆避孕药具(LARC)的提供;以及改善全科产后避孕护理的机会。虽然大多数参与者都建议在产后检查时使用 LARC 方法,但只有 12 人接受过放置宫内节育器的培训。时间限制、接受培训的机会有限、财政支持有限以及缺乏产后检查和避孕护理指南都被认为是产后避孕咨询的障碍。与会者强调了接受教育和培训的机会、全科医生的适当薪酬、卫生专业人员之间的多学科合作、实习护士的参与以及提高母亲对产后检查和产后避孕护理重要性的认识的重要性:结论:全科医生完全有能力帮助刚分娩的妇女讨论避孕问题。如果能更好地提供避孕培训、为避孕程序提供适当的报酬、加强多学科合作以及制定国家产后检查和产后避孕指南,就能改善全科医生的产后避孕护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Australia
Medical Journal of Australia 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
410
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) stands as Australia's foremost general medical journal, leading the dissemination of high-quality research and commentary to shape health policy and influence medical practices within the country. Under the leadership of Professor Virginia Barbour, the expert editorial team at MJA is dedicated to providing authors with a constructive and collaborative peer-review and publication process. Established in 1914, the MJA has evolved into a modern journal that upholds its founding values, maintaining a commitment to supporting the medical profession by delivering high-quality and pertinent information essential to medical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信