Antiviral agents and therapeutics against respiratory viruses.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Ralph A Tripp, David E Martin
{"title":"Antiviral agents and therapeutics against respiratory viruses.","authors":"Ralph A Tripp, David E Martin","doi":"10.1080/13543784.2024.2401911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Respiratory viruses are responsible for significant worldwide morbidity and mortality. While vaccines are highly effective at reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with viral infections, this protection is incomplete. It requires a high degree of compliance, which is hindered by vaccine hesitancy. To address these gaps, antiviral agents and therapeutics are crucial in combating diseases caused by respiratory viruses. Antiviral agents are broadly classified into two groups: 1) direct-acting antivirals (DAA) and 2) host-directed antivirals (HDA).</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review comprehensively examines Phase II FDA-approved antiviral drugs for influenza virus, SARS-CoV-2, and RSV as published in clinicaltrials.gov. It focuses on DAAs and various monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that have been approved for the prevention and treatment of viral respiratory tract infections.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Antiviral drugs being developed assess different mechanisms of action to combat viruses and other delivery routes (i.e. oral, inhalation, or parenteral). The associated clinical trials address the impact on disease while determining the appropriate dosage levels for further investigation in Phase III. A robust pipeline of agents is necessary to meet the global need for effective antiviral therapeutics.</p>","PeriodicalId":12313,"journal":{"name":"Expert opinion on investigational drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert opinion on investigational drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13543784.2024.2401911","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Respiratory viruses are responsible for significant worldwide morbidity and mortality. While vaccines are highly effective at reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with viral infections, this protection is incomplete. It requires a high degree of compliance, which is hindered by vaccine hesitancy. To address these gaps, antiviral agents and therapeutics are crucial in combating diseases caused by respiratory viruses. Antiviral agents are broadly classified into two groups: 1) direct-acting antivirals (DAA) and 2) host-directed antivirals (HDA).

Areas covered: This review comprehensively examines Phase II FDA-approved antiviral drugs for influenza virus, SARS-CoV-2, and RSV as published in clinicaltrials.gov. It focuses on DAAs and various monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that have been approved for the prevention and treatment of viral respiratory tract infections.

Expert opinion: Antiviral drugs being developed assess different mechanisms of action to combat viruses and other delivery routes (i.e. oral, inhalation, or parenteral). The associated clinical trials address the impact on disease while determining the appropriate dosage levels for further investigation in Phase III. A robust pipeline of agents is necessary to meet the global need for effective antiviral therapeutics.

针对呼吸道病毒的抗病毒剂和疗法。
导言:呼吸道病毒是全球发病率和死亡率的主要原因。虽然疫苗在降低与病毒感染相关的发病率和死亡率方面非常有效,但这种保护并不全面。它需要高度的依从性,而疫苗的犹豫不决阻碍了依从性。为了弥补这些不足,抗病毒药物和治疗方法对防治呼吸道病毒引起的疾病至关重要。抗病毒药物大致分为两类:1)直接作用抗病毒药物(DAA);2)宿主导向抗病毒药物(HDA):本综述全面研究了临床试验网(clinicaltrials.gov)上公布的美国食品及药物管理局(FDA)批准的治疗流感病毒、SARS-CoV-2 和 RSV 的二期抗病毒药物。重点关注已获批用于预防和治疗病毒性呼吸道感染的 DAAs 和各种单克隆抗体 (mAbs):正在开发的抗病毒药物评估了不同的作用机制,以对抗病毒和其他给药途径(即口服、吸入或肠道外)。相关临床试验在确定第三阶段进一步研究的适当剂量水平的同时,还要解决对疾病的影响问题。要满足全球对有效抗病毒疗法的需求,就必须有一个强大的药物管线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs (ISSN 1354-3784 [print], 1744-7658 [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles and original papers on drugs in preclinical and early stage clinical development, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development. The Editors welcome: Reviews covering preclinical through to Phase II data on drugs or drug classes for specific indications, and their potential impact on future treatment strategies Drug Evaluations reviewing the clinical and pharmacological data on a particular drug Original Research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on agents that are in Phase I and II clinical trials The audience consists of scientists, managers and decision-makers in the pharmaceutical industry, and others closely involved in R&D.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信