How reliable are post-mastectomy breast reconstruction videos on YouTube?

{"title":"How reliable are post-mastectomy breast reconstruction videos on YouTube?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Social media platforms are a significant source of information for young women with breast cancer (YWBC) undergoing post-mastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR). The emphasis on visual storytelling and building community in online spaces renders YouTube to be a common platform for discussions of BR. This study aims to assess the quality of YouTube videos about PMBR, identify themes related to the PMBR experience, and quantify suggestions of BR as an option PM.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>YouTube was searched incognito with terms “young women breast cancer reconstruction” in 08/2022, in order from most to least viewed. Title, upload date, length, poster identity, number of likes and comments were collected. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for audiovisual materials (PEMAT A/V) was used to evaluate understandability and actionability. DISCERN assessed quality and reliability. Presence of sponsorship, intended audience, patient and healthcare professional narratives, and suggestions of PMBR were collected. Reviewers noted whether PMBR was shown and how. Themes were collected inductively and deductively for thematic analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>193 videos were identified. Mean video length was 14.6 min (SD 20.0 min). 87.1 % included sponsorships. 95.9 % of videos were posted by an organization. 60.6 % were information-based; 45.6 % experience-based. Mean PEMAT scores for understandability and actionability were 71.3 % (SD 13.4) and 35.7 % (SD 41.8), respectively. Mean DISCERN was 2.6/5 (SD 1.2). Patient narrative was present in 52.6 % and healthcare professionals’ in 68.4 %. PMBR was visually presented 22.8 % of the time. 13.5 % of videos explicitly recommended PMBR. 2.6 % explicitly discouraged it. Patients (77.7 %) represented the majority of the intended audience. Most common deductively identified themes included treatment (87.1 %), family relationship (17.1 %), motherhood (15.5 %), fertility (11.9 %). Inductively identified subthemes included differentiating between various options for PMBR surgery, BRCA genetic testing, psychosocial effects of breast cancer and PMBR, and recovery from surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>YouTube is a platform wherein various PMBR options are widely discussed and explained. PMBR videos are highly understandable but have moderate levels of actionability, quality, and reliability. Videos are highly sponsored, demonstrating significant institutional bias. Themes are overwhelmingly treatment and surgery-based. Personal themes were present but not dominant.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024001038/pdfft?md5=62a065ee51c87e594bdcc2000e6131dc&pid=1-s2.0-S2950247024001038-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology Insight","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024001038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Social media platforms are a significant source of information for young women with breast cancer (YWBC) undergoing post-mastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR). The emphasis on visual storytelling and building community in online spaces renders YouTube to be a common platform for discussions of BR. This study aims to assess the quality of YouTube videos about PMBR, identify themes related to the PMBR experience, and quantify suggestions of BR as an option PM.

Methods

YouTube was searched incognito with terms “young women breast cancer reconstruction” in 08/2022, in order from most to least viewed. Title, upload date, length, poster identity, number of likes and comments were collected. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for audiovisual materials (PEMAT A/V) was used to evaluate understandability and actionability. DISCERN assessed quality and reliability. Presence of sponsorship, intended audience, patient and healthcare professional narratives, and suggestions of PMBR were collected. Reviewers noted whether PMBR was shown and how. Themes were collected inductively and deductively for thematic analysis.

Results

193 videos were identified. Mean video length was 14.6 min (SD 20.0 min). 87.1 % included sponsorships. 95.9 % of videos were posted by an organization. 60.6 % were information-based; 45.6 % experience-based. Mean PEMAT scores for understandability and actionability were 71.3 % (SD 13.4) and 35.7 % (SD 41.8), respectively. Mean DISCERN was 2.6/5 (SD 1.2). Patient narrative was present in 52.6 % and healthcare professionals’ in 68.4 %. PMBR was visually presented 22.8 % of the time. 13.5 % of videos explicitly recommended PMBR. 2.6 % explicitly discouraged it. Patients (77.7 %) represented the majority of the intended audience. Most common deductively identified themes included treatment (87.1 %), family relationship (17.1 %), motherhood (15.5 %), fertility (11.9 %). Inductively identified subthemes included differentiating between various options for PMBR surgery, BRCA genetic testing, psychosocial effects of breast cancer and PMBR, and recovery from surgery.

Conclusion

YouTube is a platform wherein various PMBR options are widely discussed and explained. PMBR videos are highly understandable but have moderate levels of actionability, quality, and reliability. Videos are highly sponsored, demonstrating significant institutional bias. Themes are overwhelmingly treatment and surgery-based. Personal themes were present but not dominant.

YouTube 上的乳房切除术后乳房再造视频有多可靠?
背景社交媒体平台是乳腺癌年轻女性患者进行乳房切除术后重建(PMBR)的重要信息来源。YouTube强调在网络空间中讲述视觉故事和建立社区,因此成为讨论乳房再造的常见平台。本研究旨在评估 YouTube 上有关 PMBR 的视频质量,确定与 PMBR 体验相关的主题,并量化将 BR 作为 PM 选项的建议。收集了标题、上传日期、长度、海报身份、点赞数和评论数。患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT A/V)用于评估视听材料的可理解性和可操作性。DISCERN 评估质量和可靠性。收集了赞助商、目标受众、患者和医护人员的叙述以及对 PMBR 的建议。审稿人注意到是否显示了 PMBR 以及如何显示。通过归纳和演绎收集主题,进行主题分析。平均视频长度为 14.6 分钟(标准差为 20.0 分钟)。87.1%的视频包含赞助。95.9%的视频由某个组织发布。60.6%的视频以信息为基础;45.6%的视频以体验为基础。可理解性和可操作性的 PEMAT 平均得分分别为 71.3 %(标准差 13.4)和 35.7 %(标准差 41.8)。DISCERN 的平均值为 2.6/5(标准差 1.2)。患者叙述占 52.6%,医护人员叙述占 68.4%。22.8%的视频以直观的方式展示了 PMBR。13.5% 的视频明确推荐 PMBR。2.6%的视频明确表示不推荐。患者(77.7%)占目标受众的大多数。最常见的演绎主题包括治疗(87.1%)、家庭关系(17.1%)、母性(15.5%)和生育(11.9%)。归纳出的次主题包括区分各种 PMBR 手术选择、BRCA 基因检测、乳腺癌和 PMBR 的社会心理影响以及术后恢复。PMBR 视频的可理解性很高,但可操作性、质量和可靠性处于中等水平。视频得到了大量赞助,显示出明显的机构偏见。主题绝大多数以治疗和手术为主。个人主题存在,但不占主导地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信