Hydrogeochemical analysis of processes affecting HCH removal using ZVI-based treatment technology

IF 3.1 3区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
{"title":"Hydrogeochemical analysis of processes affecting HCH removal using ZVI-based treatment technology","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.apgeochem.2024.106164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the 1960s, ca. 3000–5000 tons of HCH residue were disposed of in an overburden dump at the Hájek kaolin/uranium mine site (Czech Republic). The dump leachate, which has a 136 μg/l average total content of hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) isomers, discharges into a local creek and contaminates the ecosystem. A full-scale prototype for the treatment of dump leachate comprised three sequential stages: 1) permeable reactive modules filled with macro-zerovalent iron (mZVI), 2) a biosorption module and 3) an aerobic wetland module. After commissioning, HCH removal efficiency reached 95%, but decreased to 70% over the following 230 days, primarily due to the efficiency of the mZVI modules dropping from 76% to 39%. Hydrogeochemical analysis and geochemical modelling revealed that the reduction in efficiency was mainly caused by passivation of mZVI surfaces and clogging of mZVI pore spaces through precipitation of goethite, calcite and rhodochrosite, or siderite and magnetite instead of goethite where boundary conditions for O<sub>2</sub> differed. XRD analysis of the solid phase from the mZVI modules confirmed the geochemical modelling results. The major part of the precipitated products (46–66 wt%) comprised a ferric hydroxide amorphous phase, especially in the initial mZVI module inlet, with goethite the second most abundant precipitate (10–40 wt%). Siderite and calcite also mainly precipitated in the initial module inlet. In conclusion, mZVI appears to be a suitable reductant for HCH; however, the longevity of the ZVI-based treatment system was negatively affected by precipitates in the presence of high concentrations of iron, manganese and carbonate species.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8064,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geochemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883292724002695","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the 1960s, ca. 3000–5000 tons of HCH residue were disposed of in an overburden dump at the Hájek kaolin/uranium mine site (Czech Republic). The dump leachate, which has a 136 μg/l average total content of hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) isomers, discharges into a local creek and contaminates the ecosystem. A full-scale prototype for the treatment of dump leachate comprised three sequential stages: 1) permeable reactive modules filled with macro-zerovalent iron (mZVI), 2) a biosorption module and 3) an aerobic wetland module. After commissioning, HCH removal efficiency reached 95%, but decreased to 70% over the following 230 days, primarily due to the efficiency of the mZVI modules dropping from 76% to 39%. Hydrogeochemical analysis and geochemical modelling revealed that the reduction in efficiency was mainly caused by passivation of mZVI surfaces and clogging of mZVI pore spaces through precipitation of goethite, calcite and rhodochrosite, or siderite and magnetite instead of goethite where boundary conditions for O2 differed. XRD analysis of the solid phase from the mZVI modules confirmed the geochemical modelling results. The major part of the precipitated products (46–66 wt%) comprised a ferric hydroxide amorphous phase, especially in the initial mZVI module inlet, with goethite the second most abundant precipitate (10–40 wt%). Siderite and calcite also mainly precipitated in the initial module inlet. In conclusion, mZVI appears to be a suitable reductant for HCH; however, the longevity of the ZVI-based treatment system was negatively affected by precipitates in the presence of high concentrations of iron, manganese and carbonate species.

利用基于 ZVI 的处理技术对影响六氯环己烷去除的过程进行水文地质化学分析
20 世纪 60 年代,约有 3,000 至 5,000 吨六氯环己烷残留物被倾倒在 Hájek 高岭土/钛矿矿区(捷克共和国)的覆土堆中。垃圾场沥滤液中六氯环己烷(HCH)异构体的平均总含量为 136 微克/升,这些沥滤液排入当地的一条小溪,污染了生态系统。处理垃圾场沥滤液的全规模原型包括三个连续阶段:1) 填充大型泽戊酸铁(mZVI)的渗透反应模块;2) 生物吸附模块;3) 好氧湿地模块。试运行后,六氯环己烷的去除效率达到 95%,但在随后的 230 天内下降到 70%,这主要是由于 mZVI 模块的效率从 76% 下降到 39%。水文地球化学分析和地球化学建模显示,效率下降的主要原因是 mZVI 表面钝化以及 mZVI 孔隙堵塞,在 O2 边界条件不同的地方,通过沉淀鹅绿泥石、方解石和菱铁矿,或通过菱铁矿和磁铁矿而不是鹅绿泥石,堵塞了 mZVI 孔隙。对 mZVI 模块固相的 XRD 分析证实了地球化学建模的结果。沉淀产物的主要部分(46-66 wt%)由氢氧化铁无定形相组成,尤其是在最初的 mZVI 模块入口处,其次最多的沉淀物是鹅铁矿(10-40 wt%)。菱铁矿和方解石也主要沉淀在初始模块入口中。总之,mZVI 似乎是一种适用于六氯环己烷的还原剂;但是,在存在高浓度铁、锰和碳酸盐物种的情况下,沉淀物会对基于 ZVI 的处理系统的寿命产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Geochemistry
Applied Geochemistry 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
8.80%
发文量
272
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Applied Geochemistry is an international journal devoted to publication of original research papers, rapid research communications and selected review papers in geochemistry and urban geochemistry which have some practical application to an aspect of human endeavour, such as the preservation of the environment, health, waste disposal and the search for resources. Papers on applications of inorganic, organic and isotope geochemistry and geochemical processes are therefore welcome provided they meet the main criterion. Spatial and temporal monitoring case studies are only of interest to our international readership if they present new ideas of broad application. Topics covered include: (1) Environmental geochemistry (including natural and anthropogenic aspects, and protection and remediation strategies); (2) Hydrogeochemistry (surface and groundwater); (3) Medical (urban) geochemistry; (4) The search for energy resources (in particular unconventional oil and gas or emerging metal resources); (5) Energy exploitation (in particular geothermal energy and CCS); (6) Upgrading of energy and mineral resources where there is a direct geochemical application; and (7) Waste disposal, including nuclear waste disposal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信