Assessing the effect of multispecies interactions on precautionary reference points using an ensemble modelling approach: A North Sea case study

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES
Michael A. Spence , James A. Martindale , Khatija Alliji , Hayley J. Bannister , Robert B. Thorpe , Nicola D. Walker , Peter J. Mitchell , Matthew R. Kerr , Paul J. Dolder
{"title":"Assessing the effect of multispecies interactions on precautionary reference points using an ensemble modelling approach: A North Sea case study","authors":"Michael A. Spence ,&nbsp;James A. Martindale ,&nbsp;Khatija Alliji ,&nbsp;Hayley J. Bannister ,&nbsp;Robert B. Thorpe ,&nbsp;Nicola D. Walker ,&nbsp;Peter J. Mitchell ,&nbsp;Matthew R. Kerr ,&nbsp;Paul J. Dolder","doi":"10.1016/j.fishres.2024.107160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The precautionary approach to fisheries management requires accounting of uncertainty to ensure stock sustainability. Most fisheries management is based on a single-species approach, with stocks assumed independent of one another, even though it is known that stocks interact through predation and competition for resources. The strength of these interactions depends on the relative abundance and size/age composition of stocks, but they are usually treated as fixed. Therefore, a key question is: can we simultaneously adopt the precautionary approach for multiple stocks while accounting for these interactions? Here we examine the impact of stock interactions on calculations of precautionary reference points for nine stocks in the North Sea. We combined four multispecies models using an ensemble model to rigorously quantify uncertainty and explore the rates of fishing mortality that leads to groups of stocks being fished according to the precautionary approach. We found that relaxing the assumption of stock independence meant that no fishing at all was only precautionary for six of nine stocks, and no fishing strategy was precautionary for all nine. We suggest that it is necessary to account for multispecies interactions when calculating precautionary reference points.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50443,"journal":{"name":"Fisheries Research","volume":"280 ","pages":"Article 107160"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783624002248/pdfft?md5=3d0666a2aa2359e56f2de7c618a4cb00&pid=1-s2.0-S0165783624002248-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fisheries Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783624002248","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The precautionary approach to fisheries management requires accounting of uncertainty to ensure stock sustainability. Most fisheries management is based on a single-species approach, with stocks assumed independent of one another, even though it is known that stocks interact through predation and competition for resources. The strength of these interactions depends on the relative abundance and size/age composition of stocks, but they are usually treated as fixed. Therefore, a key question is: can we simultaneously adopt the precautionary approach for multiple stocks while accounting for these interactions? Here we examine the impact of stock interactions on calculations of precautionary reference points for nine stocks in the North Sea. We combined four multispecies models using an ensemble model to rigorously quantify uncertainty and explore the rates of fishing mortality that leads to groups of stocks being fished according to the precautionary approach. We found that relaxing the assumption of stock independence meant that no fishing at all was only precautionary for six of nine stocks, and no fishing strategy was precautionary for all nine. We suggest that it is necessary to account for multispecies interactions when calculating precautionary reference points.

利用集合建模方法评估多物种相互作用对预防性参考点的影响:北海案例研究
渔业管理的预防性方法要求考虑不确定性,以确保种群的可持续性。大多数渔业管理都是基于单一物种方法,假定种群之间相互独立,尽管众所周知,种群之间通过捕食和资源竞争而相互作用。这些相互作用的强度取决于种群的相对丰度和大小/年龄组成,但通常被视为固定不变。因此,一个关键问题是:我们能否在考虑这些相互作用的同时,对多个种群采取预防性方法?在此,我们研究了种群相互作用对计算北海九个种群的预防性参考点的影响。我们利用集合模型将四个多物种模型结合在一起,对不确定性进行严格量化,并探讨了导致根据预防性方法捕捞不同种群的捕捞死亡率。我们发现,放宽种群独立性假设意味着完全不捕捞只对九个种群中的六个种群具有预防性,而不采取任何捕捞策略则对所有九个种群都具有预防性。我们建议,在计算预防性参考点时,有必要考虑多物种之间的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fisheries Research
Fisheries Research 农林科学-渔业
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
294
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal provides an international forum for the publication of papers in the areas of fisheries science, fishing technology, fisheries management and relevant socio-economics. The scope covers fisheries in salt, brackish and freshwater systems, and all aspects of associated ecology, environmental aspects of fisheries, and economics. Both theoretical and practical papers are acceptable, including laboratory and field experimental studies relevant to fisheries. Papers on the conservation of exploitable living resources are welcome. Review and Viewpoint articles are also published. As the specified areas inevitably impinge on and interrelate with each other, the approach of the journal is multidisciplinary, and authors are encouraged to emphasise the relevance of their own work to that of other disciplines. The journal is intended for fisheries scientists, biological oceanographers, gear technologists, economists, managers, administrators, policy makers and legislators.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信