{"title":"Finite-Element modelling of axial movements of polyethylene pipes in dense sand","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The current design guidelines (e.g., ALA 2005) have been reported to underpredict the axial pullout resistance measured in laboratory and field tests for pipes buried in dense sand. The higher pullout resistances in the tests were believed to be due to the shearing-induced soil dilation at the pipe–soil interface. However, the mechanism of soil dilation could not be measured during the tests. In the current study, three-dimensional finite-element (FE) analysis was employed to examine the mechanism, which revealed that the effect of shearing-induced dilation could be insignificant, depending on the magnitude of the earth pressures. For pipes buried at shallow depths, the compaction-induced lateral earth pressures significantly contributed to higher interface normal stresses and the increase of normal stress due to shear-induced dilation, resulting in relatively higher pullout resistances. The stiffness of the pipe and soil also influenced the interface normal stress. The compaction-induced lateral earth pressure increase was modelled using equivalent temperature loads in the FE analysis that successfully simulated the measured pipe responses. Based on the findings, a modification to the current design equation to calculate the maximum axial spring force was proposed, incorporating the compaction-induced lateral earth pressure and a normal stress adjustment factor.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56013,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Geotechnics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214391224001879","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The current design guidelines (e.g., ALA 2005) have been reported to underpredict the axial pullout resistance measured in laboratory and field tests for pipes buried in dense sand. The higher pullout resistances in the tests were believed to be due to the shearing-induced soil dilation at the pipe–soil interface. However, the mechanism of soil dilation could not be measured during the tests. In the current study, three-dimensional finite-element (FE) analysis was employed to examine the mechanism, which revealed that the effect of shearing-induced dilation could be insignificant, depending on the magnitude of the earth pressures. For pipes buried at shallow depths, the compaction-induced lateral earth pressures significantly contributed to higher interface normal stresses and the increase of normal stress due to shear-induced dilation, resulting in relatively higher pullout resistances. The stiffness of the pipe and soil also influenced the interface normal stress. The compaction-induced lateral earth pressure increase was modelled using equivalent temperature loads in the FE analysis that successfully simulated the measured pipe responses. Based on the findings, a modification to the current design equation to calculate the maximum axial spring force was proposed, incorporating the compaction-induced lateral earth pressure and a normal stress adjustment factor.
据报道,目前的设计指南(如 ALA 2005)对埋在密实砂土中的管道在实验室和现场测试中测得的轴向抗拔力预测不足。试验中较高的抗拔阻力被认为是由于管道与土壤界面处由剪切引起的土壤膨胀。然而,在试验过程中无法测量土壤扩张的机理。在本次研究中,采用了三维有限元(FE)分析来研究其机理,结果表明,剪切引起的膨胀影响可能微不足道,这取决于土压力的大小。对于埋深较浅的管道,压实引起的侧向土压力会显著增加界面法向应力,剪切引起的扩张也会增加法向应力,从而导致相对较高的抗拔能力。管道和土壤的刚度也会影响界面法向应力。在有限元分析中,使用等效温度荷载对压实引起的侧向土压力增加进行建模,成功模拟了测得的管道响应。根据研究结果,对当前计算最大轴向弹力的设计方程提出了修改建议,将压实引起的侧向土压力和法向应力调整系数纳入其中。
期刊介绍:
Transportation Geotechnics is a journal dedicated to publishing high-quality, theoretical, and applied papers that cover all facets of geotechnics for transportation infrastructure such as roads, highways, railways, underground railways, airfields, and waterways. The journal places a special emphasis on case studies that present original work relevant to the sustainable construction of transportation infrastructure. The scope of topics it addresses includes the geotechnical properties of geomaterials for sustainable and rational design and construction, the behavior of compacted and stabilized geomaterials, the use of geosynthetics and reinforcement in constructed layers and interlayers, ground improvement and slope stability for transportation infrastructures, compaction technology and management, maintenance technology, the impact of climate, embankments for highways and high-speed trains, transition zones, dredging, underwater geotechnics for infrastructure purposes, and the modeling of multi-layered structures and supporting ground under dynamic and repeated loads.