Cross sectional analysis of an addiction consultation service, substance co-use patterns, and receipt of medications for opioid use disorder during hospitalization

0 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
{"title":"Cross sectional analysis of an addiction consultation service, substance co-use patterns, and receipt of medications for opioid use disorder during hospitalization","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2024.209505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Despite effective medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), treatment engagement remains low. As the overdose crisis is increasingly characterized by opioids co-used with other substances, it is important to understand whether existing models effectively support treatment for patients who use multiple substances. Hospital-based addiction consultation services (ACS) have shown promise at increasing MOUD initiation and treatment engagement, but the effectiveness for patients with specific co-use patterns remains unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using 2016–2023 admissions data from a large safety net hospital, we estimated a random-effects logistic regression model to determine whether specific co-use (methamphetamine, cocaine, alcohol, sedative, and other) moderated the effect of being seen by ACS on the receipt of MOUD. Adjusting for patient sociodemographic, health, and admission characteristics we estimated the proportion of patients who received MOUD across specific co-use groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 7679 total admissions indicating opioid use, of which 5266 (68.6 %) indicated co-use of one or more substances and 2387 (31.1 %) were seen by the ACS. Among admissions not seen by the ACS, a smaller proportion of admissions with any co-use received MOUD (23.5 %; 95 % CI: 21.9–25.1) compared to admissions with opioid use alone (34.0 %; 95 % CI: 31.9–36.1). However, among admissions seen by the ACS a similar proportion of admissions with any co-use received MOUD (57.8 %; 95 % CI: 55.5–60.1) as admissions with opioid use alone (56.2 %; 95 % CI: 52.2–60.2). The increase in proportion of admissions receiving MOUD associated with being seen by the ACS was larger for admissions with methamphetamine (38.6 percentage points; 95 % CI: 34.6–42.6) or cannabis co-use (39.0 percentage points; 95 % CI: 32.9–45.1) compared to admissions without methamphetamine (25.7 percentage points; 95 % CI: 22.2–29.2) or cannabis co-use (29.1 percentage points; 95 % CI: 26.1–32.1).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The ACS is an effective hospital-based treatment model for increasing the proportion of admissions which receive MOUD. This study shows that ACSs are also able to support increased receipt of MOUD for patients who use other substances in addition to opioids. Future research is needed to further understand what transition strategies best support treatment linkage for patients who use multiple substances.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875924002170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Despite effective medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), treatment engagement remains low. As the overdose crisis is increasingly characterized by opioids co-used with other substances, it is important to understand whether existing models effectively support treatment for patients who use multiple substances. Hospital-based addiction consultation services (ACS) have shown promise at increasing MOUD initiation and treatment engagement, but the effectiveness for patients with specific co-use patterns remains unknown.

Methods

Using 2016–2023 admissions data from a large safety net hospital, we estimated a random-effects logistic regression model to determine whether specific co-use (methamphetamine, cocaine, alcohol, sedative, and other) moderated the effect of being seen by ACS on the receipt of MOUD. Adjusting for patient sociodemographic, health, and admission characteristics we estimated the proportion of patients who received MOUD across specific co-use groups.

Results

Of 7679 total admissions indicating opioid use, of which 5266 (68.6 %) indicated co-use of one or more substances and 2387 (31.1 %) were seen by the ACS. Among admissions not seen by the ACS, a smaller proportion of admissions with any co-use received MOUD (23.5 %; 95 % CI: 21.9–25.1) compared to admissions with opioid use alone (34.0 %; 95 % CI: 31.9–36.1). However, among admissions seen by the ACS a similar proportion of admissions with any co-use received MOUD (57.8 %; 95 % CI: 55.5–60.1) as admissions with opioid use alone (56.2 %; 95 % CI: 52.2–60.2). The increase in proportion of admissions receiving MOUD associated with being seen by the ACS was larger for admissions with methamphetamine (38.6 percentage points; 95 % CI: 34.6–42.6) or cannabis co-use (39.0 percentage points; 95 % CI: 32.9–45.1) compared to admissions without methamphetamine (25.7 percentage points; 95 % CI: 22.2–29.2) or cannabis co-use (29.1 percentage points; 95 % CI: 26.1–32.1).

Conclusions

The ACS is an effective hospital-based treatment model for increasing the proportion of admissions which receive MOUD. This study shows that ACSs are also able to support increased receipt of MOUD for patients who use other substances in addition to opioids. Future research is needed to further understand what transition strategies best support treatment linkage for patients who use multiple substances.

对成瘾咨询服务、药物共同使用模式以及住院期间接受阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗的情况进行横断面分析。
导言:尽管治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)的药物很有效,但治疗参与度仍然很低。由于阿片类药物与其他药物同时使用日益成为用药过量危机的特征,因此了解现有模式是否能有效支持对使用多种药物的患者的治疗非常重要。以医院为基础的成瘾咨询服务(ACS)在提高 MOUD 启动率和治疗参与度方面已显示出前景,但对具有特定共同使用模式的患者的有效性仍是未知数:利用一家大型安全网医院 2016-2023 年的入院数据,我们估计了一个随机效应逻辑回归模型,以确定特定的共同使用(甲基苯丙胺、可卡因、酒精、镇静剂和其他)是否会调节接受 ACS 就诊对接受 MOUD 的影响。在对患者的社会人口学特征、健康状况和入院特征进行调整后,我们估算出了在特定共同使用群体中接受 MOUD 的患者比例:在 7679 例表明使用阿片类药物的入院患者中,有 5266 例(68.6%)表明同时使用一种或多种药物,其中 2387 例(31.1%)接受了 ACS 的治疗。在未接受阿片类药物治疗的入院患者中,与单独使用阿片类药物的入院患者(34.0%;95% CI:31.9-36.1)相比,接受 "谅解备忘录 "治疗的患者比例较小(23.5%;95% CI:21.9-25.1),但在接受阿片类药物治疗的入院患者中,接受 "谅解备忘录 "治疗的患者比例较高。然而,在接受 ACS 诊治的入院患者中,接受 "MOUD "治疗的比例(57.8%;95% CI:55.5-60.1)与单独使用阿片类药物的入院患者(56.2%;95% CI:52.2-60.2)相近。与不吸食甲基苯丙胺(25.7 个百分点;95 % CI:22.2-29.2)或大麻(29.1 个百分点;95 % CI:26.1-32.1)的入院者相比,吸食甲基苯丙胺(38.6 个百分点;95 % CI:34.6-42.6)或共同吸食大麻(39.0 个百分点;95 % CI:32.9-45.1)的入院者接受 MOUD 的比例因接受 ACS 就诊而增加的幅度更大:ACS 是一种有效的医院治疗模式,可提高接受 MOUD 的入院比例。这项研究表明,ACS 还能帮助更多使用阿片类药物以外的其他药物的患者接受 "牟利治疗"。未来的研究需要进一步了解什么样的过渡策略能够最好地支持使用多种药物的患者接受治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信