Buprenorphine discontinuation in telehealth-only treatment for opioid use disorder: A longitudinal cohort analysis

0 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
{"title":"Buprenorphine discontinuation in telehealth-only treatment for opioid use disorder: A longitudinal cohort analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2024.209511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, federal agencies permitted telehealth initiation of buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) without in-person assessment. It remains unclear how telehealth-only buprenorphine treatment impacts time to discontinuation and patient reported treatment outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A longitudinal observational cohort study conducted September 2021 through March, 2023 enrolled participants with OUD initiating buprenorphine (≤ 45 days) with internet and phone access in Oregon and Washington. The intervention was a fully telehealth-only (THO) app versus treatment as usual (TAU) in office-based settings with some telehealth. We assessed self-reported buprenorphine discontinuation at 4-,12-, and 24-weeks. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) calculated unadjusted and adjusted relative risk ratios (RR) for discontinuation averaged over the study period. Secondary outcomes included change in the Brief Addiction Monitor (BAM) and the visual analogue craving scale. Generalized linear models estimated average within-group and between-group differences over time.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants (<em>n</em> = 103 THO; <em>n</em> = 56 TAU) had a mean age of 37 years (SD = 9.8 years) and included 52 % women, 83 % with Medicaid insurance, 80 % identified as White, 65 % unemployed/student, and 19 % unhoused. There were differences in gender (THO = 54 % women vs. TAU = 44 %, <em>p</em> = .04), unemployed status (60 % vs 75 %, <em>p</em> <em>=</em> .02), and stable housing (84 % vs 73 %, <em>p</em> <em>=</em> .02). Rates of buprenorphine discontinuation were low in the THO (4 %) and TAU (13 %) groups across 24 weeks. In the adjusted analysis, the risk of discontinuation was 61 % lower in the THO group (aRR = 0.39, 95 % CI [0.17, 0.89], <em>p</em> <em>=</em> .026). Decreases occurred over time on the harms subscale of the BAM (within-group difference − 0.85, <em>p</em> = .0004 [THO], and − 0.68, <em>p</em> <em>=</em> .04 [TAU]<em>)</em> and cravings (within-group difference − 13.47, <em>p</em> = .0001 [THO] vs −7.65, <em>p</em> = .01 [TAU]).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A telehealth-only platform reduced the risk of buprenorphine discontinuation compared to office-based TAU. In-person evaluation to receive buprenorphine may not be necessary for treatment-seeking patients.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical trials identifier</h3><p><span><span>NCT03224858</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875924002236/pdfft?md5=bcc8e60081e9b40b01e561dcde83f665&pid=1-s2.0-S2949875924002236-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875924002236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, federal agencies permitted telehealth initiation of buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) without in-person assessment. It remains unclear how telehealth-only buprenorphine treatment impacts time to discontinuation and patient reported treatment outcomes.

Methods

A longitudinal observational cohort study conducted September 2021 through March, 2023 enrolled participants with OUD initiating buprenorphine (≤ 45 days) with internet and phone access in Oregon and Washington. The intervention was a fully telehealth-only (THO) app versus treatment as usual (TAU) in office-based settings with some telehealth. We assessed self-reported buprenorphine discontinuation at 4-,12-, and 24-weeks. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) calculated unadjusted and adjusted relative risk ratios (RR) for discontinuation averaged over the study period. Secondary outcomes included change in the Brief Addiction Monitor (BAM) and the visual analogue craving scale. Generalized linear models estimated average within-group and between-group differences over time.

Results

Participants (n = 103 THO; n = 56 TAU) had a mean age of 37 years (SD = 9.8 years) and included 52 % women, 83 % with Medicaid insurance, 80 % identified as White, 65 % unemployed/student, and 19 % unhoused. There were differences in gender (THO = 54 % women vs. TAU = 44 %, p = .04), unemployed status (60 % vs 75 %, p = .02), and stable housing (84 % vs 73 %, p = .02). Rates of buprenorphine discontinuation were low in the THO (4 %) and TAU (13 %) groups across 24 weeks. In the adjusted analysis, the risk of discontinuation was 61 % lower in the THO group (aRR = 0.39, 95 % CI [0.17, 0.89], p = .026). Decreases occurred over time on the harms subscale of the BAM (within-group difference − 0.85, p = .0004 [THO], and − 0.68, p = .04 [TAU]) and cravings (within-group difference − 13.47, p = .0001 [THO] vs −7.65, p = .01 [TAU]).

Conclusions

A telehealth-only platform reduced the risk of buprenorphine discontinuation compared to office-based TAU. In-person evaluation to receive buprenorphine may not be necessary for treatment-seeking patients.

Clinical trials identifier

NCT03224858

阿片类药物使用障碍远程医疗治疗中丁丙诺啡的停用:纵向队列分析。
导言:在 COVID-19 大流行之初,联邦机构允许远程医疗启动丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类药物使用障碍 (OUD),而无需亲自评估。目前仍不清楚仅通过远程医疗进行丁丙诺啡治疗对停药时间和患者报告的治疗结果有何影响:方法:2021 年 9 月至 2023 年 3 月进行的一项纵向观察队列研究招募了俄勒冈州和华盛顿州使用互联网和电话开始丁丙诺啡治疗(不超过 45 天)的 OUD 患者。干预措施为完全远程医疗(THO)应用与在办公室环境下进行的常规治疗(TAU)(含部分远程医疗)。我们在 4 周、12 周和 24 周时对自我报告的丁丙诺啡停药情况进行了评估。广义估计方程 (GEE) 计算了研究期间平均的未调整和调整后的停药相对风险比 (RR)。次要结果包括简明成瘾监测量表(BAM)和视觉模拟渴求量表的变化。广义线性模型估计了随时间变化的组内和组间平均差异:参与者(n = 103 THO;n = 56 TAU)的平均年龄为 37 岁(SD = 9.8 岁),其中 52% 为女性,83% 有医疗补助保险,80% 为白人,65% 为失业/学生,19% 无住房。在性别(THO = 54 % 女性 vs. TAU = 44 %,p = .04)、失业状况(60 % vs. 75 %,p = .02)和稳定住房(84 % vs. 73 %,p = .02)方面存在差异。在 24 周内,丁丙诺啡停药率在 THO 组(4%)和 TAU 组(13%)较低。在调整分析中,THO 组的停药风险降低了 61%(aRR = 0.39,95 % CI [0.17,0.89],p = .026)。随着时间的推移,BAM 的危害分量表(组内差异 - 0.85,p = .0004 [THO];- 0.68,p = .04 [TAU])和渴望程度(组内差异 - 13.47,p = .0001 [THO] vs -7.65,p = .01 [TAU])均有所降低:结论:与基于诊室的 TAU 相比,纯远程医疗平台降低了中断丁丙诺啡治疗的风险。对于寻求治疗的患者来说,接受丁丙诺啡可能不需要亲自评估:临床试验标识符:NCT03224858。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信