Racial inequities in cesarean use among high- and low-risk deliveries: An analysis of childbirth hospitalizations in New Jersey from 2000 to 2015.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Alecia J McGregor, David Garman, Peiyin Hung, Motunrayo Tosin-Oni, Kaitlyn Camacho Orona, Rose L Molina, Katrina J Ciraldo, Katy Backes Kozhimannil
{"title":"Racial inequities in cesarean use among high- and low-risk deliveries: An analysis of childbirth hospitalizations in New Jersey from 2000 to 2015.","authors":"Alecia J McGregor, David Garman, Peiyin Hung, Motunrayo Tosin-Oni, Kaitlyn Camacho Orona, Rose L Molina, Katrina J Ciraldo, Katy Backes Kozhimannil","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine racial inequities in low-risk and high-risk (or \"medically appropriate\") cesarean delivery rates in New Jersey during the era surrounding the United States cesarean surge and peak.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>This retrospective repeated cross-sectional study examined the universe of childbirth hospitalizations in New Jersey from January 1, 2000 through September 30, 2015. We estimate the likelihood of cesarean delivery by maternal race and ethnicity, with mixed-level logistic regression models, stratified by cesarean risk level designated by the Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine (SMFM).</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>We used all-payer hospital discharge data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's State Inpatient Discharge Database and linked this data to the American Hospital Association Annual Survey. ZIP-code Tabulation Area (ZCTA)-level racialized economic segregation index data were from the 2007-2011 American Community Survey. We identified 1,604,976 statewide childbirth hospitalizations using International Classification of Diseases-9-CM (ICD-9) diagnosis and procedure codes and Diagnosis-Related Group codes, and created an indicator of cesarean delivery using ICD-9 codes.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Among low-risk deliveries, Black patients, particularly those in the age group of 35-39 years, had higher predicted probabilities of giving birth via cesarean than White people in the same age categories (Black-adjusted predicted probability = 24.0%; vs. White-adjusted predicted probability = 17.3%). Among high-risk deliveries, Black patients aged 35 to 39 years had a lower predicted probability (by 2.7 percentage points) of giving birth via cesarean compared with their White counterparts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study uncovered a lack of medically appropriate cesarean delivery for Black patients, with low-risk Black patients at higher odds of cesarean delivery and high-risk Black patients at lower odds of cesarean than their White counterparts. The significant Black-White inequities highlight the need to address misalignment of evidence-based cesarean delivery practice in the efforts to improve maternal health equity. Quality metrics that track whether cesareans are provided when medically needed may contribute to clinical and policy efforts to prevent disproportionate maternal morbidity and mortality among Black patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14375","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine racial inequities in low-risk and high-risk (or "medically appropriate") cesarean delivery rates in New Jersey during the era surrounding the United States cesarean surge and peak.

Study setting and design: This retrospective repeated cross-sectional study examined the universe of childbirth hospitalizations in New Jersey from January 1, 2000 through September 30, 2015. We estimate the likelihood of cesarean delivery by maternal race and ethnicity, with mixed-level logistic regression models, stratified by cesarean risk level designated by the Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine (SMFM).

Data sources and analytic sample: We used all-payer hospital discharge data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's State Inpatient Discharge Database and linked this data to the American Hospital Association Annual Survey. ZIP-code Tabulation Area (ZCTA)-level racialized economic segregation index data were from the 2007-2011 American Community Survey. We identified 1,604,976 statewide childbirth hospitalizations using International Classification of Diseases-9-CM (ICD-9) diagnosis and procedure codes and Diagnosis-Related Group codes, and created an indicator of cesarean delivery using ICD-9 codes.

Principal findings: Among low-risk deliveries, Black patients, particularly those in the age group of 35-39 years, had higher predicted probabilities of giving birth via cesarean than White people in the same age categories (Black-adjusted predicted probability = 24.0%; vs. White-adjusted predicted probability = 17.3%). Among high-risk deliveries, Black patients aged 35 to 39 years had a lower predicted probability (by 2.7 percentage points) of giving birth via cesarean compared with their White counterparts.

Conclusions: This study uncovered a lack of medically appropriate cesarean delivery for Black patients, with low-risk Black patients at higher odds of cesarean delivery and high-risk Black patients at lower odds of cesarean than their White counterparts. The significant Black-White inequities highlight the need to address misalignment of evidence-based cesarean delivery practice in the efforts to improve maternal health equity. Quality metrics that track whether cesareans are provided when medically needed may contribute to clinical and policy efforts to prevent disproportionate maternal morbidity and mortality among Black patients.

高风险和低风险分娩中使用剖宫产的种族不平等:对 2000 年至 2015 年新泽西州分娩住院情况的分析。
目的:研究在美国剖宫产激增和高峰时期,新泽西州低风险和高风险(或 "医学上适当")剖宫产率的种族不平等现象:研究背景和设计:这项回顾性重复横断面研究调查了 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 9 月 30 日期间新泽西州的住院分娩情况。我们通过混合水平逻辑回归模型,按照母胎医学会(SMFM)指定的剖宫产风险水平分层,估计了产妇种族和民族剖宫产的可能性:我们使用了医疗成本与利用项目(Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project)的州住院病人出院数据库(State Inpatient Discharge Database)中的所有付费医院出院数据,并将该数据与美国医院协会年度调查(American Hospital Association Annual Survey)相链接。邮政编码制表区(ZCTA)级别的种族经济隔离指数数据来自 2007-2011 年美国社区调查。我们使用《国际疾病分类-9-CM》(ICD-9)的诊断和手术代码以及诊断相关组代码确定了全州 1,604,976 例分娩住院病例,并使用 ICD-9 代码创建了剖宫产指标:主要发现:在低风险分娩中,黑人患者,尤其是 35-39 岁年龄组的黑人患者通过剖宫产分娩的预测概率高于同年龄组的白人患者(黑人调整后的预测概率 = 24.0%;白人调整后的预测概率 = 17.3%)。在高风险分娩中,35 至 39 岁的黑人患者通过剖宫产分娩的预测概率比白人患者低 2.7 个百分点:这项研究发现,黑人患者缺乏医学上适当的剖宫产,与白人患者相比,低风险黑人患者的剖宫产几率更高,而高风险黑人患者的剖宫产几率更低。黑人与白人之间的严重不平等凸显了在改善孕产妇健康公平性的过程中解决循证剖宫产实践不对等问题的必要性。跟踪是否在医学需要时提供剖宫产的质量指标可能有助于临床和政策工作,防止黑人患者中孕产妇发病率和死亡率过高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信