Arthroscopic repair of anteroinferior glenoid rim fractures: mean 10-year clinical and radiologic results.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Elisabeth Boehm, Andreas Keck, David Krueger, Markus Scheibel
{"title":"Arthroscopic repair of anteroinferior glenoid rim fractures: mean 10-year clinical and radiologic results.","authors":"Elisabeth Boehm, Andreas Keck, David Krueger, Markus Scheibel","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.07.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To date, long-term results of the arthroscopic repair of glenoid rim fractures are missing. The aim of this study was, to evaluate clinical and radiographic results following arthroscopic repair of anteroinferior glenoid fractures using anchors or bioabsorbable compression screws after a mean follow-up period of 10 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical outcome measures included evaluation of recurrent instability, the Constant Score, Subjective Shoulder Value, Rowe Score (RS), Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Score, and Melbourne Instability Shoulder Score. X-ray images were obtained for assessment of an instability arthropathy (IA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three patients (7 female and 16 male, mean (±standard deviation) age 48 ± 15 years) who underwent arthroscopic repair of an acute substantial solitary or multifragmented anteroinferior glenoid rim fracture were enrolled. After a mean follow-up period of 10 ± 2 years, patients reached a mean Constant Score of 92 ± 10 points, Subjective Shoulder Value of 93 ± 11%, RS of 84 ± 20 points, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Score of 98 ± 2%, and Melbourne Instability Shoulder Score of 91 ± 11 points. No patient suffered recurrent dislocation. Radiographic results were obtained of 18 patients. Signs of IA were noted in 9 patients (50%) with progression of IA in all cases in comparison to the preoperative status. Patients with IA were significantly older (52 vs. 38 years, P = .04). Clinical score results did not show a significant difference in patients with vs. without IA except for the RS (74 vs. 94 points, P = .02). No intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed, and no patient required revision endoprosthetic surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Arthroscopic repair of acute anteroinferior glenoid rim fractures shows good clinical long-term results. High rates of IA were observed especially in older patients. However, the presence of IA did not seem to influence the subjective shoulder score outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.07.027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To date, long-term results of the arthroscopic repair of glenoid rim fractures are missing. The aim of this study was, to evaluate clinical and radiographic results following arthroscopic repair of anteroinferior glenoid fractures using anchors or bioabsorbable compression screws after a mean follow-up period of 10 years.

Methods: Clinical outcome measures included evaluation of recurrent instability, the Constant Score, Subjective Shoulder Value, Rowe Score (RS), Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Score, and Melbourne Instability Shoulder Score. X-ray images were obtained for assessment of an instability arthropathy (IA).

Results: Twenty-three patients (7 female and 16 male, mean (±standard deviation) age 48 ± 15 years) who underwent arthroscopic repair of an acute substantial solitary or multifragmented anteroinferior glenoid rim fracture were enrolled. After a mean follow-up period of 10 ± 2 years, patients reached a mean Constant Score of 92 ± 10 points, Subjective Shoulder Value of 93 ± 11%, RS of 84 ± 20 points, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Score of 98 ± 2%, and Melbourne Instability Shoulder Score of 91 ± 11 points. No patient suffered recurrent dislocation. Radiographic results were obtained of 18 patients. Signs of IA were noted in 9 patients (50%) with progression of IA in all cases in comparison to the preoperative status. Patients with IA were significantly older (52 vs. 38 years, P = .04). Clinical score results did not show a significant difference in patients with vs. without IA except for the RS (74 vs. 94 points, P = .02). No intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed, and no patient required revision endoprosthetic surgery.

Conclusion: Arthroscopic repair of acute anteroinferior glenoid rim fractures shows good clinical long-term results. High rates of IA were observed especially in older patients. However, the presence of IA did not seem to influence the subjective shoulder score outcomes.

关节镜修复盂唇前缘骨折:平均 10 年临床和放射学结果。
背景:迄今为止,关节镜下修复盂骨边缘骨折的长期结果尚属空白。本研究旨在评估使用锚或生物可吸收加压螺钉在关节镜下修复盂前缘骨折后的临床和影像学结果,平均随访时间为 10 年:临床结果测量包括复发性不稳定性评估、恒定评分(CS)、主观肩部价值(SSV)、罗氏评分(RS)、西安大略省肩关节不稳定性评分(WOSI)和墨尔本肩关节不稳定性评分(MISS)。结果:23名患者(7名女性和16名男性,平均(± SD)年龄为48±15岁)接受了关节镜修复急性实质性单发或多发盂前缘骨折。经过平均 10 ± 2 年的随访,患者的 CS 平均值为 92 ± 10 分,SSV 平均值为 93 ± 11%,RS 平均值为 84 ± 20 分,WOSI 平均值为 98 ± 2%,MISS 平均值为 91 ± 11 分。没有患者复发脱位。18 名患者获得了放射影像学结果。9名患者(50%)出现了IA迹象,与术前相比,所有病例的IA均有进展。IA患者的年龄明显偏大(52岁对38岁,P = 0.04)。临床评分结果显示,除RS(74分对94分,P = 0.02)外,有IA和无IA的患者没有明显差异。没有观察到术中或术后并发症,也没有患者需要进行修复手术:结论:关节镜下修复急性盂前缘骨折显示出良好的长期临床效果。结论:关节镜下修复急性盂前下缘骨折具有良好的临床长期效果。然而,IA的存在似乎并不影响肩关节的主观评分结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信