Interdisciplinary teaching squares enhance reflection and collegiality: A collaborative pedagogical approach

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
{"title":"Interdisciplinary teaching squares enhance reflection and collegiality: A collaborative pedagogical approach","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To explore the experiences of interdisciplinary Higher Educational Academics within Nursing, Midwifery, Pharmacy and Biomedical Science in the use of teaching squares as a formative, collaborative pedagogical tool to promote reflection.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>One approach to enhancing academic teaching practice involves the provision of feedback to individual academics. This approach can be challenging for the reviewer, hence other less intimidating approaches are popular. One such approach is the teaching square. In this approach typically 4 other teaching staff are involved in observing their peers’ teaching methods (synchronous or asynchronous) and then engaging in a cycle of personal reflection. Reflection on teaching practices of their peers can provide opportunity to improve their own teaching. Typically teaching squares involve participants from the same academic discipline, however, in this study participants from related yet different disciplines were purposely connected and the benefits of this approach assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A qualitative descriptive design was used to explore the participants’ experiences of undertaking interdisciplinary teaching squares through online questionnaires and focus group feedback opportunities.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study was undertaken between August 2022 to June 2023 at an Australian university. Sixteen academic staff members from Nursing, Midwifery, Pharmacy &amp; Pharmaceutical science and Biological science expressed an interest in the project. Five participants elected not to continue citing time pressures and 11 staff members participated in the project. Participation involved completing the teaching square experience and a subsequent focus group that were held to explore their experiences of undertaking a teaching square. The demographic survey data were presented and the focus group interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Triangulation of the findings resulted in the identification of four main themes: Teaching squares for professional networks; Perceptions of Safety; Stepping in and out of a reflective cycle; and Time Constraints vs. Time Value.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The study aimed to explore the effectiveness of teaching squares in encouraging academic reflection on teaching and fostering a collaborative teaching culture within interdisciplinary higher education academics. An unexpected finding was the value and promotion of interdisciplinarity professional relationships and networks. The findings from this research project offer valuable insights into the benefits of adopting teaching squares in health education and contributes to evidence-based pedagogical practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595324002506/pdfft?md5=95398ca9ef43602eedaf0a42f741e4bc&pid=1-s2.0-S1471595324002506-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595324002506","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To explore the experiences of interdisciplinary Higher Educational Academics within Nursing, Midwifery, Pharmacy and Biomedical Science in the use of teaching squares as a formative, collaborative pedagogical tool to promote reflection.

Background

One approach to enhancing academic teaching practice involves the provision of feedback to individual academics. This approach can be challenging for the reviewer, hence other less intimidating approaches are popular. One such approach is the teaching square. In this approach typically 4 other teaching staff are involved in observing their peers’ teaching methods (synchronous or asynchronous) and then engaging in a cycle of personal reflection. Reflection on teaching practices of their peers can provide opportunity to improve their own teaching. Typically teaching squares involve participants from the same academic discipline, however, in this study participants from related yet different disciplines were purposely connected and the benefits of this approach assessed.

Design

A qualitative descriptive design was used to explore the participants’ experiences of undertaking interdisciplinary teaching squares through online questionnaires and focus group feedback opportunities.

Methods

This study was undertaken between August 2022 to June 2023 at an Australian university. Sixteen academic staff members from Nursing, Midwifery, Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical science and Biological science expressed an interest in the project. Five participants elected not to continue citing time pressures and 11 staff members participated in the project. Participation involved completing the teaching square experience and a subsequent focus group that were held to explore their experiences of undertaking a teaching square. The demographic survey data were presented and the focus group interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically.

Results

Triangulation of the findings resulted in the identification of four main themes: Teaching squares for professional networks; Perceptions of Safety; Stepping in and out of a reflective cycle; and Time Constraints vs. Time Value.

Conclusions

The study aimed to explore the effectiveness of teaching squares in encouraging academic reflection on teaching and fostering a collaborative teaching culture within interdisciplinary higher education academics. An unexpected finding was the value and promotion of interdisciplinarity professional relationships and networks. The findings from this research project offer valuable insights into the benefits of adopting teaching squares in health education and contributes to evidence-based pedagogical practices.

跨学科教学方阵加强了反思和合作:合作教学法。
目的:探讨护理学、助产学、药学和生物医学科学领域的跨学科高等教育学者在使用教学广场作为促进反思的形成性协作教学工具方面的经验:背景:加强学术教学实践的方法之一是向个别学者提供反馈。这种方法对审查者来说可能具有挑战性,因此其他不那么吓人的方法很受欢迎。教学广场就是其中之一。在这种方法中,通常有 4 名其他教学人员参与观察同行的教学方法(同步或非同步),然后进行个人反思。对同行教学方法的反思可以为改进自己的教学提供机会。通常情况下,教学方阵的参与者来自同一学科,但在本研究中,特意将来自相关但不同学科的参与者联系起来,并对这种方法的益处进行评估:设计:采用定性描述设计,通过在线问卷调查和焦点小组反馈机会,探讨参与者开展跨学科教学广场活动的经验:本研究于2022年8月至2023年6月在澳大利亚一所大学进行。来自护理学、助产学、药剂学和生物科学的 16 名学术人员对该项目表示了兴趣。五名参与者以时间紧迫为由选择不再继续,11 名教职员工参与了该项目。参与活动包括完成教学广场体验,以及随后举行的焦点小组讨论,以探讨他们开展教学广场活动的经验。对人口调查数据和焦点小组访谈进行了记录、转录和专题分析:对调查结果进行三角分析后,确定了四大主题:专业网络的教学广场;对安全的看法;进入和退出反思周期;时间限制与时间价值:本研究旨在探讨教学广场在鼓励跨学科高等教育学术界对教学进行学术反思和培养合作教学文化方面的有效性。一个意想不到的发现是跨学科专业关系和网络的价值和促进作用。本研究项目的发现为在健康教育中采用教学广场的益处提供了宝贵的见解,并有助于循证教学实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
180
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信