Vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction for temporary closure in open abdomen: A single-arm meta-analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
World Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1002/wjs.12336
Gabriele Eckerdt Lech, Brian Henriques Neves, Gilson Tenório Oliveira, Carlos André Balthazar da Silveira, Julia Adriana Kasmirski, Diego L Lima, Leandro Totti Cavazzola
{"title":"Vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction for temporary closure in open abdomen: A single-arm meta-analysis.","authors":"Gabriele Eckerdt Lech, Brian Henriques Neves, Gilson Tenório Oliveira, Carlos André Balthazar da Silveira, Julia Adriana Kasmirski, Diego L Lima, Leandro Totti Cavazzola","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Open abdomen (OA) therapy is used in the management of patients who require surgery for severe abdominal conditions. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the VAWCM technique regarding short and long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central were systematically searched for studies that analyzed VAWCM therapy in OA. Primary outcomes were the complete fascial closure rate and mean duration of OA treatment. Statistical analyses were performed using R statistical software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies comprising 535 patients were included. We found a complete fascial closure rate of 77.3 per 100 patients (80.1%; 95% CI 59.6-88.7; I<sup>2</sup> = 76%), with an overall mortality of 30.3 per 100 (33.5%; 95% CI 9.3-19.4; I<sup>2</sup> = 78%). The pooled mean duration of OA treatment was 14.6 days (95% CI 10.7-18.6; I<sup>2</sup> = 93%), while the mean length of hospital stay was 43.3 days (95% CI 21.2-65.3; I<sup>2</sup> = 96%). As additional outcomes, we found an enteroatmospheric fistula rate of 5.6 per 100 patients (5.4%; 95% CI 2.3-13.3; I<sup>2</sup> = 45%) and incisional hernia rate of 34.7 per 100 (34.6%; 95% CI 28.9-41.1; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). The subgroup analysis of mesh materials (polypropylene or polyglactin) showed a higher complete fascial closure rate for the polyglactin (89.1% vs. 66.6%; p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings showed that VAWCM is a viable option for OA treatment, successfully reaching complete fascial closure, with a low duration of the technique, even though it presented a high heterogeneity between the studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12336","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Open abdomen (OA) therapy is used in the management of patients who require surgery for severe abdominal conditions. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the VAWCM technique regarding short and long-term outcomes.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central were systematically searched for studies that analyzed VAWCM therapy in OA. Primary outcomes were the complete fascial closure rate and mean duration of OA treatment. Statistical analyses were performed using R statistical software.

Results: Seven studies comprising 535 patients were included. We found a complete fascial closure rate of 77.3 per 100 patients (80.1%; 95% CI 59.6-88.7; I2 = 76%), with an overall mortality of 30.3 per 100 (33.5%; 95% CI 9.3-19.4; I2 = 78%). The pooled mean duration of OA treatment was 14.6 days (95% CI 10.7-18.6; I2 = 93%), while the mean length of hospital stay was 43.3 days (95% CI 21.2-65.3; I2 = 96%). As additional outcomes, we found an enteroatmospheric fistula rate of 5.6 per 100 patients (5.4%; 95% CI 2.3-13.3; I2 = 45%) and incisional hernia rate of 34.7 per 100 (34.6%; 95% CI 28.9-41.1; I2 = 0%). The subgroup analysis of mesh materials (polypropylene or polyglactin) showed a higher complete fascial closure rate for the polyglactin (89.1% vs. 66.6%; p = 0.02).

Conclusion: Our findings showed that VAWCM is a viable option for OA treatment, successfully reaching complete fascial closure, with a low duration of the technique, even though it presented a high heterogeneity between the studies.

真空辅助伤口闭合术和网片辅助筋膜牵引术用于开腹手术的临时闭合:单臂荟萃分析。
导言:开腹(OA)疗法用于治疗因严重腹部疾病而需要手术的患者。本荟萃分析旨在评估 VAWCM 技术的短期和长期疗效:方法:系统检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Central 中分析 OA 中 VAWCM 治疗的研究。主要结果为筋膜完全闭合率和 OA 治疗的平均持续时间。统计分析使用 R 统计软件进行:结果:共纳入 7 项研究,535 名患者。我们发现每 100 例患者中筋膜完全闭合率为 77.3 例(80.1%;95% CI 59.6-88.7;I2 = 76%),总死亡率为每 100 例患者中 30.3 例(33.5%;95% CI 9.3-19.4;I2 = 78%)。OA 治疗的总平均持续时间为 14.6 天(95% CI 10.7-18.6;I2 = 93%),平均住院时间为 43.3 天(95% CI 21.2-65.3;I2 = 96%)。在其他结果方面,我们发现每 100 例患者中肠瘘发生率为 5.6 例(5.4%;95% CI 2.3-13.3;I2 = 45%),切口疝发生率为 34.7 例(34.6%;95% CI 28.9-41.1;I2 = 0%)。对网片材料(聚丙烯或聚乳酸)的亚组分析显示,聚乳酸的筋膜完全闭合率更高(89.1% 对 66.6%;P = 0.02):我们的研究结果表明,VAWCM 是治疗 OA 的一种可行方案,它能成功实现筋膜完全闭合,且该技术的持续时间较短,尽管不同研究之间存在高度异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Surgery
World Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
460
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信