"Identifying complication risk factors in reduction mammaplasty: a single-center analysis of 1021 patients applying machine learning methods".

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Updates in Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1007/s13304-024-01980-7
Maximilian Mahrhofer, Christoph Wallner, Raphael Reichert, Frederic Fierdel, Mattia Nolli, Maiwand Sidiq, Thomas Schoeller, Laurenz Weitgasser
{"title":"\"Identifying complication risk factors in reduction mammaplasty: a single-center analysis of 1021 patients applying machine learning methods\".","authors":"Maximilian Mahrhofer, Christoph Wallner, Raphael Reichert, Frederic Fierdel, Mattia Nolli, Maiwand Sidiq, Thomas Schoeller, Laurenz Weitgasser","doi":"10.1007/s13304-024-01980-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Various surgical approaches and pedicles have been described to ensure safe and satisfactory results in reduction mammaplasty. Although different breasts require different techniques, complications are common. This study aims to assess the incidence of complications following primary bilateral reduction mammaplasties across a diverse range of pedicle methods within one of the largest single-center cohorts to date, utilizing machine learning methodologies. A retrospective review of primary bilateral reduction mammaplasties at a single surgical center between January 2016 and March 2020 was performed. Patient medical records and surgical details were reviewed. Complications were compared among three different pedicles. Binary recursive partitioning (CART) machine learning was employed to identify risk factors. In total, 1021 patients (2142 breasts) met the inclusion criteria. The superomedial pedicle was the most frequently utilized (48.0%), with an overall complication rate of 21%. While pedicle-based subgroups demonstrated significant demographic variance, overall complication rates differed most between the inferior (24.9%) and the superomedial pedicle (17.7%). Statistical analysis identified resection weight as the sole significant independent risk factor (OR 1.001, p = 0.007). The machine learning model revealed that total resection weights exceeding 1700 g significantly increased the risk of overall complications, while a sternal notch to nipple (SNN)-distance > 36.5 cm correlated with complications involving the nipple-areola complex (NAC). Higher resection weights are associated with elevated complication rates. Preoperative assessment utilizing SNN-distance can aid in predicting NAC complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2943-2952"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-01980-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Various surgical approaches and pedicles have been described to ensure safe and satisfactory results in reduction mammaplasty. Although different breasts require different techniques, complications are common. This study aims to assess the incidence of complications following primary bilateral reduction mammaplasties across a diverse range of pedicle methods within one of the largest single-center cohorts to date, utilizing machine learning methodologies. A retrospective review of primary bilateral reduction mammaplasties at a single surgical center between January 2016 and March 2020 was performed. Patient medical records and surgical details were reviewed. Complications were compared among three different pedicles. Binary recursive partitioning (CART) machine learning was employed to identify risk factors. In total, 1021 patients (2142 breasts) met the inclusion criteria. The superomedial pedicle was the most frequently utilized (48.0%), with an overall complication rate of 21%. While pedicle-based subgroups demonstrated significant demographic variance, overall complication rates differed most between the inferior (24.9%) and the superomedial pedicle (17.7%). Statistical analysis identified resection weight as the sole significant independent risk factor (OR 1.001, p = 0.007). The machine learning model revealed that total resection weights exceeding 1700 g significantly increased the risk of overall complications, while a sternal notch to nipple (SNN)-distance > 36.5 cm correlated with complications involving the nipple-areola complex (NAC). Higher resection weights are associated with elevated complication rates. Preoperative assessment utilizing SNN-distance can aid in predicting NAC complications.

Abstract Image

"识别乳房缩小成形术中的并发症风险因素:应用机器学习方法对 1021 名患者进行的单中心分析"。
为了确保乳房缩小术的安全和令人满意的效果,已经介绍了各种手术方法和路径。虽然不同的乳房需要不同的技术,但并发症也很常见。本研究旨在利用机器学习方法,在迄今为止规模最大的单中心队列中,评估各种不同基底方法的原发性双侧乳房缩小整形术后并发症的发生率。该研究对 2016 年 1 月至 2020 年 3 月期间在一家手术中心进行的原发性双侧乳房缩小术进行了回顾性分析。对患者病历和手术细节进行了回顾。比较了三种不同基底的并发症。采用二进制递归分区(CART)机器学习来识别风险因素。共有 1021 名患者(2142 个乳房)符合纳入标准。上内侧椎弓根是最常用的椎弓根(48.0%),总体并发症发生率为 21%。虽然以蒂为基础的亚组显示出显著的人口统计学差异,但下蒂(24.9%)和上内侧蒂(17.7%)之间的总体并发症发生率差异最大。统计分析表明,切除重量是唯一显著的独立风险因素(OR 1.001,p = 0.007)。机器学习模型显示,切除总重量超过1700克会显著增加整体并发症的风险,而胸骨切迹到乳头(SNN)的距离大于36.5厘米与涉及乳头乳晕复合体(NAC)的并发症相关。切除重量越大,并发症发生率越高。利用SNN距离进行术前评估有助于预测NAC并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信