George X. Huang , Lauren E. Merz , Geneva D. Mehta , Kathleen D. Marquis , Kylie Besz , Donna-Marie Lynch , Corey Cutler , Mariana C. Castells
{"title":"Preadmission Penicillin Allergy Evaluation Before Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Optimizes Febrile Neutropenia Treatment and Inpatient Resource Utilization","authors":"George X. Huang , Lauren E. Merz , Geneva D. Mehta , Kathleen D. Marquis , Kylie Besz , Donna-Marie Lynch , Corey Cutler , Mariana C. Castells","doi":"10.1016/j.jtct.2024.08.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Febrile neutropenia is a common complication of conditioning chemotherapy for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), but a major barrier for optimal treatment of febrile neutropenia is historical penicillin allergies. Our group recently published a development of a clinical pipeline for delabeling penicillin allergies in adult patients planned to undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). In this retrospective cohort study, we followed patients to evaluate their outcomes during inpatient admission for HSCT. We hypothesized that, among patients planned for HSCT with a self-reported penicillin allergy, completing penicillin allergy testing (amoxicillin ingestion challenge with or without concomitant penicillin skin testing) prior to HSCT admission would be associated with differences in inpatient treatment for febrile neutropenia (including antibiotic selection and timing of antibiotic administration) and improved inpatient resource utilization (including nursing and inpatient physician consults). We identified patients with a self-reported penicillin allergy who answered a penicillin allergy questionnaire and were subsequently admitted to our institution for HSCT. We divided the cohort into 2 groups: patients whose penicillin allergy was evaluated prior to admission (EPTA) and patients whose penicillin allergy was not evaluated prior to admission (NEPTA). We then performed comparison between the 2 groups for general clinical outcomes of HSCT admission (duration of admission, need for ICU transfer, readmission rate, etc.), febrile neutropenia treatment, and inpatient resource utilization. Statistics were calculated using the nonparametric 2-tailed Fisher exact test for categorical outcomes and the nonparametric 2-tailed Mann-Whitney U test for numerical outcomes. Within our cohort, 35 patients completed penicillin allergy testing prior to HSCT admission (EPTA) and 44 patients did not (NEPTA). Demographics were similar between these groups, and there was no significant difference in the rate of febrile neutropenia during HSCT admission (EPTA 64% versus NEPTA 66%, <em>P</em> = 1.00). EPTA patients were significantly more likely to receive standard first-line antibiotics (cefepime or ceftazidime) for febrile neutropenia (EPTA 95% versus NEPTA 65%, <em>P</em> = .015) and time between febrile neutropenia onset and antibiotic administration was shorter (EPTA mean 66 mins versus NEPTA mean 121 mins, <em>P</em> = .0058). No patients in the EPTA group experienced an immediate hypersensitivity reaction (hives, anaphylaxis, etc.) or severe cutaneous adverse reaction (SCAR) during HSCT admission. EPTA patients were also significantly less likely to require 1:1 nursing for antibiotic test doses, challenges, and desensitizations (EPTA 0% versus NEPTA 49%, <em>P</em> < .0001); less likely to require inpatient allergy consult (EPTA 0% versus NEPTA 12%, <em>P</em> = .031); and less likely to require inpatient antimicrobial stewardship consult (EPTA 0% versus NEPTA 13%, <em>P</em> = .013) during their HSCT admission. In summary, patients who completed penicillin allergy testing prior to HSCT admission were more likely to receive first-line antibiotics and received antibiotics more rapidly for treatment of febrile neutropenia. Furthermore, patients who completed penicillin allergy testing prior to HSCT admission were less likely to require 1:1 nursing, inpatient allergy consults, and inpatient antimicrobial stewardship consults during HSCT admission.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23283,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","volume":"30 11","pages":"Pages 1112.e1-1112.e9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666636724006237","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Febrile neutropenia is a common complication of conditioning chemotherapy for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), but a major barrier for optimal treatment of febrile neutropenia is historical penicillin allergies. Our group recently published a development of a clinical pipeline for delabeling penicillin allergies in adult patients planned to undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). In this retrospective cohort study, we followed patients to evaluate their outcomes during inpatient admission for HSCT. We hypothesized that, among patients planned for HSCT with a self-reported penicillin allergy, completing penicillin allergy testing (amoxicillin ingestion challenge with or without concomitant penicillin skin testing) prior to HSCT admission would be associated with differences in inpatient treatment for febrile neutropenia (including antibiotic selection and timing of antibiotic administration) and improved inpatient resource utilization (including nursing and inpatient physician consults). We identified patients with a self-reported penicillin allergy who answered a penicillin allergy questionnaire and were subsequently admitted to our institution for HSCT. We divided the cohort into 2 groups: patients whose penicillin allergy was evaluated prior to admission (EPTA) and patients whose penicillin allergy was not evaluated prior to admission (NEPTA). We then performed comparison between the 2 groups for general clinical outcomes of HSCT admission (duration of admission, need for ICU transfer, readmission rate, etc.), febrile neutropenia treatment, and inpatient resource utilization. Statistics were calculated using the nonparametric 2-tailed Fisher exact test for categorical outcomes and the nonparametric 2-tailed Mann-Whitney U test for numerical outcomes. Within our cohort, 35 patients completed penicillin allergy testing prior to HSCT admission (EPTA) and 44 patients did not (NEPTA). Demographics were similar between these groups, and there was no significant difference in the rate of febrile neutropenia during HSCT admission (EPTA 64% versus NEPTA 66%, P = 1.00). EPTA patients were significantly more likely to receive standard first-line antibiotics (cefepime or ceftazidime) for febrile neutropenia (EPTA 95% versus NEPTA 65%, P = .015) and time between febrile neutropenia onset and antibiotic administration was shorter (EPTA mean 66 mins versus NEPTA mean 121 mins, P = .0058). No patients in the EPTA group experienced an immediate hypersensitivity reaction (hives, anaphylaxis, etc.) or severe cutaneous adverse reaction (SCAR) during HSCT admission. EPTA patients were also significantly less likely to require 1:1 nursing for antibiotic test doses, challenges, and desensitizations (EPTA 0% versus NEPTA 49%, P < .0001); less likely to require inpatient allergy consult (EPTA 0% versus NEPTA 12%, P = .031); and less likely to require inpatient antimicrobial stewardship consult (EPTA 0% versus NEPTA 13%, P = .013) during their HSCT admission. In summary, patients who completed penicillin allergy testing prior to HSCT admission were more likely to receive first-line antibiotics and received antibiotics more rapidly for treatment of febrile neutropenia. Furthermore, patients who completed penicillin allergy testing prior to HSCT admission were less likely to require 1:1 nursing, inpatient allergy consults, and inpatient antimicrobial stewardship consults during HSCT admission.
背景:发热性中性粒细胞减少症是造血干细胞移植(HSCT)条件化疗的常见并发症,但发热性中性粒细胞减少症最佳治疗的主要障碍是青霉素过敏史。我们的研究小组最近发表了一项研究成果,为计划接受造血干细胞移植(HSCT)的成年患者制定了解除青霉素过敏标签的临床方案。在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们对患者进行了跟踪,以评估他们在造血干细胞移植住院期间的治疗效果:我们假设,在计划接受造血干细胞移植且自我报告对青霉素过敏的患者中,入院前完成青霉素过敏测试(阿莫西林摄入挑战,同时或不同时进行青霉素皮试)与发热性中性粒细胞减少症住院治疗的差异(包括抗生素选择和抗生素给药时机)以及住院资源利用率的改善(包括护理和住院医生咨询)有关:研究设计:我们确定了自我报告对青霉素过敏的患者,这些患者回答了青霉素过敏问卷,随后在我院接受造血干细胞移植。我们将患者分为两组:入院前已评估青霉素过敏的患者(EPTA)和入院前未评估青霉素过敏的患者(NEPTA)。然后,我们对两组患者的造血干细胞移植入院一般临床结果(入院时间、转入重症监护室的需要、再入院率等)、发热性中性粒细胞减少症治疗和住院资源利用情况进行了比较。对分类结果采用非参数双尾费舍尔精确检验,对数字结果采用非参数双尾曼-惠特尼U检验。 结果:在我们的队列中,35名患者在造血干细胞移植入院前完成了青霉素过敏检测(EPTA),44名患者没有完成(NEPTA)。两组患者的人口统计学特征相似,造血干细胞移植入院期间发热性中性粒细胞减少率无显著差异(EPTA 64% vs NEPTA 66%,P=1.00)。EPTA组患者接受标准一线抗生素(头孢吡肟或头孢他啶)治疗发热性中性粒细胞减少症的几率明显更高(EPTA组95% vs NEPTA组65%,p=0.015),发热性中性粒细胞减少症发病与抗生素用药之间的时间更短(EPTA组平均66分钟 vs NEPTA组平均121分钟,p=0.0058)。在造血干细胞移植入院期间,EPTA组没有患者出现即刻超敏反应(荨麻疹、过敏性休克等)或严重皮肤不良反应(SCAR)。EPTA组患者需要1:1护理进行抗生素试验剂量、挑战和脱敏的几率也明显较低(EPTA 0% vs NEPTA 49%,p结论:总之,在造血干细胞移植入院前完成青霉素过敏测试的患者更有可能接受一线抗生素治疗,并能更快地接受抗生素治疗发热性中性粒细胞减少症。此外,造血干细胞移植入院前完成青霉素过敏检测的患者在造血干细胞移植入院期间需要1:1护理、住院过敏咨询和住院抗菌药物管理咨询的可能性较低。