Prevalence and Prognostic Impact of Multiple Frailty Domain in Japanese Older Adults

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
{"title":"Prevalence and Prognostic Impact of Multiple Frailty Domain in Japanese Older Adults","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>In this observational study, we aimed to evaluate the independent and overlapping effects of multiple frailty domains on long-term care insurance (LTCI) use.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Population-based cohort design.</p></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><p>In total, 9804 community-dwelling older adults were recruited from the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology-Study of Geriatric Syndromes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The physical domain of frailty was assessed using the revised Japanese version of the Cardiovascular Health Study criteria. The cognitive domain of frailty was identified as impairment of memory, attention, executive function, or processing speed using standardized thresholds established for each domain in population-based cohorts. The social domain was operationalized using the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology-Social Frailty Scale. The use of LTCI was prospectively determined over 60 months using data extracted from the Japanese long-term care insurance system.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The data from 7745 participants were analyzed, of whom 793 (10.2%) required LTCI certification within 60 months (interquartile range: 60–60 months). The Kaplan–Meier curve analysis demonstrated that a high number of frailty domains was associated with incident LTCI use. The proportions of incident LTCI use were 6.0%, 12.4%, 30.1%, and 43.9% for non-frail participants and those with impairments in 1, 2, and 3 frailty domains, respectively. In the multivariate Cox regression model, physical, cognitive, and social domain impairments independently increased the risk of incident LTCI use [physical domain impairment, hazard ratio (HR), 1.67; 95% CI, 1.39–2.01; cognitive domain impairment, HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.37–1.84; social domain impairment, HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.05–1.50].</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><p>Overlapping frailty domains were strongly associated with incident LTCI use among community-dwelling older adults. These findings emphasize the importance of assessing multiple frailty domains and tailoring interventions according to the unique circumstances of older adults to prevent functional disabilities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861024006601","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

In this observational study, we aimed to evaluate the independent and overlapping effects of multiple frailty domains on long-term care insurance (LTCI) use.

Design

Population-based cohort design.

Setting and Participants

In total, 9804 community-dwelling older adults were recruited from the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology-Study of Geriatric Syndromes.

Methods

The physical domain of frailty was assessed using the revised Japanese version of the Cardiovascular Health Study criteria. The cognitive domain of frailty was identified as impairment of memory, attention, executive function, or processing speed using standardized thresholds established for each domain in population-based cohorts. The social domain was operationalized using the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology-Social Frailty Scale. The use of LTCI was prospectively determined over 60 months using data extracted from the Japanese long-term care insurance system.

Results

The data from 7745 participants were analyzed, of whom 793 (10.2%) required LTCI certification within 60 months (interquartile range: 60–60 months). The Kaplan–Meier curve analysis demonstrated that a high number of frailty domains was associated with incident LTCI use. The proportions of incident LTCI use were 6.0%, 12.4%, 30.1%, and 43.9% for non-frail participants and those with impairments in 1, 2, and 3 frailty domains, respectively. In the multivariate Cox regression model, physical, cognitive, and social domain impairments independently increased the risk of incident LTCI use [physical domain impairment, hazard ratio (HR), 1.67; 95% CI, 1.39–2.01; cognitive domain impairment, HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.37–1.84; social domain impairment, HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.05–1.50].

Conclusions and Implications

Overlapping frailty domains were strongly associated with incident LTCI use among community-dwelling older adults. These findings emphasize the importance of assessing multiple frailty domains and tailoring interventions according to the unique circumstances of older adults to prevent functional disabilities.

日本老年人多重虚弱领域的患病率和预后影响。
研究目的在这项观察性研究中,我们旨在评估多个虚弱领域对长期护理保险(LTCI)使用的独立和重叠影响:设计:基于人群的队列设计:从国家老年医学和老年学中心--老年综合症研究中总共招募了 9804 名居住在社区的老年人:方法:采用心血管健康研究标准的日文修订版对虚弱的身体领域进行评估。虚弱的认知领域是指记忆力、注意力、执行功能或处理速度受损,采用的是基于人群的队列中为每个领域设定的标准化阈值。社会领域采用美国国家老年医学和老年学中心的社会虚弱量表进行操作。利用从日本长期护理保险系统中提取的数据,对 60 个月内长期护理保险的使用情况进行了前瞻性测定:对 7745 名参与者的数据进行了分析,其中 793 人(10.2%)在 60 个月内(四分位数区间:60-60 个月)需要进行 LTCI 认证。卡普兰-梅耶曲线分析表明,虚弱领域的数量越多,就越容易发生使用 LTCI 的情况。在非虚弱参与者和在 1、2、3 个虚弱领域存在障碍的参与者中,发生使用 LTCI 的比例分别为 6.0%、12.4%、30.1% 和 43.9%。在多变量考克斯回归模型中,躯体、认知和社会领域的损伤会独立增加发生使用 LTCI 的风险(躯体领域损伤,危险比 [HR],1.67;95% CI,1.39-2.01;认知领域损伤,HR,1.59;95% CI,1.37-1.84;社会领域损伤,HR,1.26;95% CI,1.05-1.50):在社区居住的老年人中,重叠的虚弱领域与长期护理保险的使用密切相关。这些发现强调了评估多个虚弱领域并根据老年人的特殊情况制定干预措施以预防功能性残疾的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信