Clinical pregnancy rates after blastocyst culture at a stable temperature of 36.6°C versus 37.1°C: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Koen Wouters, Ileana Mateizel, Ingrid Segers, Hilde Van de Velde, Lisbet Van Landuyt, Anick De Vos, Celine Schoemans, Danijel Jankovic, Christophe Blockeel, Panagiotis Drakopoulos, Herman Tournaye, Neelke De Munck
{"title":"Clinical pregnancy rates after blastocyst culture at a stable temperature of 36.6°C versus 37.1°C: a prospective randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Koen Wouters, Ileana Mateizel, Ingrid Segers, Hilde Van de Velde, Lisbet Van Landuyt, Anick De Vos, Celine Schoemans, Danijel Jankovic, Christophe Blockeel, Panagiotis Drakopoulos, Herman Tournaye, Neelke De Munck","doi":"10.1093/humrep/deae193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study question: </strong>Is there a difference in clinical pregnancy rates (CPRs) in good prognosis patients after single embryo transfer (SET) on Day 5, in case of stable culture at 36.6°C or 37.1°C?</p><p><strong>Summary answer: </strong>CPR (with heartbeat at 7 weeks) after blastocyst transfer do not differ after culturing at 36.6°C or 37.1°C.</p><p><strong>What is known already: </strong>Since the beginning of IVF, embryo culture has been performed at 37.0°C; however, the optimal culture temperature remains unknown. Changes in incubator types have led to significant improvements in temperature control. Stable temperature control, i.e. with temperature differences of max. 0.1°C between chambers, is possible in some incubators. A previous prospective pilot study showed that embryo development on Day 5/6 was not affected when embryos were cultured at a stable temperature of 36.6°C or 37.1°C, but culture at 37.1°C resulted in an increased CPR when compared to culture at 36.6°C (74.2% vs 46.4%).</p><p><strong>Study design, size, duration: </strong>A prospective randomized controlled trial was performed in a tertiary fertility centre between February 2017 and November 26, 2022. A sample size of 89/89 patients with fresh single embryo transfer (SET) was required to achieve 80% power to detect a difference of 0.22 between group proportions (0.43-0.65) at a significance level of 0.05 using a two-sided z-test with continuity correction.</p><p><strong>Participants/materials, setting, methods: </strong>Patients were recruited on the day of oocyte retrieval based on inclusion criteria with final randomization after denudation once six mature oocytes were present. The primary endpoint was CPR (heartbeat at 7 weeks); secondary endpoints were fertilization rate, blastocyst development, biochemical pregnancy rate, live birth rate (LBR), and cumulative live birth rate (CLBR).</p><p><strong>Main results and the role of chance: </strong>A total of 304 patients were eligible for the study; of these 268 signed the consent, 234 (intention-to-treat) were randomized and 181 (per-protocol) received a SET on Day 5: 90 received culture at 36.6°C and 91 at 37.1°C. Patients were on average 32.4 ± 3.5 versus 32.5 ± 4.2 years old, respectively. No differences were observed in embryological outcomes per cycle between culture at 36.6°C versus 37.1°C: 12.0 ± 3.8 vs 12.1 ± 3.8 COCs retrieved (P = 0.88), 10.0 ± 3.1 versus 9.9 ± 2.9 mature oocytes inseminated (P = 0.68), with a maturation rate of 84.2% (901/1083) versus 83.5% (898/1104) (P = 0.87); and 8.0 ± 3.1 versus 7.9 ± 2.7 normally fertilized oocytes with a fertilization rate of 79.7% (720/901) vs 80.5% (718/898) (P = 0.96), respectively. On average 1.5 ± 1.7 versus 1.4 ± 1.9 (P = 0.25) and 1.1 ± 1.1 versus 0.9 ± 1.0 (P = 0.45) supernumerary blastocysts were vitrified on Day 5 and Day 6, respectively. The utilization rate per fertilized oocyte was 46.1% vs 41.5% (P = 0.14). A SET was performed for 181 patients, leading to a biochemical pregnancy rate of 72.2% (65/90) versus 62.7% (57/91) (P = 0.17), respectively. The CPR per fresh transfer cycle was 51.1% (46/90) versus 48.4% (44/91) [OR (95% CI) 1.11 (0.59-2.08), P = 0.710]. To date, a CLBR of 73.3% (66/90) versus 67.0% (61/91) (P = 0.354) has been observed, respectively. In each group, seven patients without live birth have remaining blastocysts frozen. The CPR for the intention-to-treat groups were 38.3% vs 38.6% [OR (95% CI) 0.98 (0.56-1.73), P = 0.967], respectively, for culture at 36.6°C versus 37.1°C.</p><p><strong>Limitations, reasons for caution: </strong>Only selected patients with expected good prognosis were eligible for the study.</p><p><strong>Wider implications of the findings: </strong>Embryos tend to tolerate small changes in temperature deviations during culture to the blastocyst stage, as demonstrated by their similar implantation potential at two slightly different temperatures.</p><p><strong>Study funding/competing interest(s): </strong>There is no funding or conflicts of interest to declare.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT03548532.</p><p><strong>Trial registration date: </strong>23 October 2017.</p><p><strong>Date of first patient’s enrolment: </strong>10 November 2017.</p>","PeriodicalId":13003,"journal":{"name":"Human reproduction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deae193","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study question: Is there a difference in clinical pregnancy rates (CPRs) in good prognosis patients after single embryo transfer (SET) on Day 5, in case of stable culture at 36.6°C or 37.1°C?

Summary answer: CPR (with heartbeat at 7 weeks) after blastocyst transfer do not differ after culturing at 36.6°C or 37.1°C.

What is known already: Since the beginning of IVF, embryo culture has been performed at 37.0°C; however, the optimal culture temperature remains unknown. Changes in incubator types have led to significant improvements in temperature control. Stable temperature control, i.e. with temperature differences of max. 0.1°C between chambers, is possible in some incubators. A previous prospective pilot study showed that embryo development on Day 5/6 was not affected when embryos were cultured at a stable temperature of 36.6°C or 37.1°C, but culture at 37.1°C resulted in an increased CPR when compared to culture at 36.6°C (74.2% vs 46.4%).

Study design, size, duration: A prospective randomized controlled trial was performed in a tertiary fertility centre between February 2017 and November 26, 2022. A sample size of 89/89 patients with fresh single embryo transfer (SET) was required to achieve 80% power to detect a difference of 0.22 between group proportions (0.43-0.65) at a significance level of 0.05 using a two-sided z-test with continuity correction.

Participants/materials, setting, methods: Patients were recruited on the day of oocyte retrieval based on inclusion criteria with final randomization after denudation once six mature oocytes were present. The primary endpoint was CPR (heartbeat at 7 weeks); secondary endpoints were fertilization rate, blastocyst development, biochemical pregnancy rate, live birth rate (LBR), and cumulative live birth rate (CLBR).

Main results and the role of chance: A total of 304 patients were eligible for the study; of these 268 signed the consent, 234 (intention-to-treat) were randomized and 181 (per-protocol) received a SET on Day 5: 90 received culture at 36.6°C and 91 at 37.1°C. Patients were on average 32.4 ± 3.5 versus 32.5 ± 4.2 years old, respectively. No differences were observed in embryological outcomes per cycle between culture at 36.6°C versus 37.1°C: 12.0 ± 3.8 vs 12.1 ± 3.8 COCs retrieved (P = 0.88), 10.0 ± 3.1 versus 9.9 ± 2.9 mature oocytes inseminated (P = 0.68), with a maturation rate of 84.2% (901/1083) versus 83.5% (898/1104) (P = 0.87); and 8.0 ± 3.1 versus 7.9 ± 2.7 normally fertilized oocytes with a fertilization rate of 79.7% (720/901) vs 80.5% (718/898) (P = 0.96), respectively. On average 1.5 ± 1.7 versus 1.4 ± 1.9 (P = 0.25) and 1.1 ± 1.1 versus 0.9 ± 1.0 (P = 0.45) supernumerary blastocysts were vitrified on Day 5 and Day 6, respectively. The utilization rate per fertilized oocyte was 46.1% vs 41.5% (P = 0.14). A SET was performed for 181 patients, leading to a biochemical pregnancy rate of 72.2% (65/90) versus 62.7% (57/91) (P = 0.17), respectively. The CPR per fresh transfer cycle was 51.1% (46/90) versus 48.4% (44/91) [OR (95% CI) 1.11 (0.59-2.08), P = 0.710]. To date, a CLBR of 73.3% (66/90) versus 67.0% (61/91) (P = 0.354) has been observed, respectively. In each group, seven patients without live birth have remaining blastocysts frozen. The CPR for the intention-to-treat groups were 38.3% vs 38.6% [OR (95% CI) 0.98 (0.56-1.73), P = 0.967], respectively, for culture at 36.6°C versus 37.1°C.

Limitations, reasons for caution: Only selected patients with expected good prognosis were eligible for the study.

Wider implications of the findings: Embryos tend to tolerate small changes in temperature deviations during culture to the blastocyst stage, as demonstrated by their similar implantation potential at two slightly different temperatures.

Study funding/competing interest(s): There is no funding or conflicts of interest to declare.

Trial registration number: NCT03548532.

Trial registration date: 23 October 2017.

Date of first patient’s enrolment: 10 November 2017.

在 36.6°C 与 37.1°C 的稳定温度下进行囊胚培养后的临床妊娠率:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
研究问题:在 36.6°C 或 37.1°C 稳定培养的情况下,预后良好的患者在第 5 天进行单胚胎移植(SET)后的临床妊娠率(CPR)是否存在差异?囊胚移植后的 CPR(7 周时有心跳)在 36.6°C 或 37.1°C 温度下培养后没有差异:自体外受精开始以来,胚胎培养一直在 37.0°C 进行;但是,最佳培养温度仍然未知。培养箱类型的变化使温度控制有了显著改善。稳定的温度控制,即培养室之间的温差不超过 0.1°C。0.1°C。之前的一项前瞻性试验研究表明,在 36.6°C 或 37.1°C 的稳定温度下培养胚胎,第 5/6 天的胚胎发育不受影响,但与 36.6°C 的培养温度相比,37.1°C 的培养温度导致 CPR 增加(74.2% 对 46.4%):一项前瞻性随机对照试验于2017年2月至2022年11月26日在一家三级生殖中心进行。样本量为89/89例新鲜单胚胎移植(SET)患者,需要达到80%的功率,才能在0.05的显著性水平下检测到组间比例(0.43-0.65)0.22的差异,采用双侧z检验并进行连续性校正:根据纳入标准在取卵当天招募患者,一旦出现六个成熟卵母细胞,则在去核后进行最终随机化。主要终点是CPR(7周时的心跳);次要终点是受精率、囊胚发育、生化妊娠率、活产率(LBR)和累积活产率(CLBR):共有 304 名患者符合研究条件;其中 268 人签署了同意书,234 人(意向治疗)被随机分配,181 人(按协议)在第 5 天接受了 SET:90 人在 36.6°C 接受了培养,91 人在 37.1°C 接受了培养。患者的平均年龄分别为(32.4 ± 3.5)岁和(32.5 ± 4.2)岁。36.6°C与37.1°C的胚胎培养结果无差异:取回的 COC 为 12.0 ± 3.8 对 12.1 ± 3.8(P = 0.88),授精的成熟卵母细胞为 10.0 ± 3.1 对 9.9 ± 2.9(P = 0.68),成熟率为 84.2%(901/1083)对 83.5%(898/1104)(P = 0.87);正常受精卵细胞数为 8.0 ± 3.1 对 7.9 ± 2.7,受精率分别为 79.7%(720/901)对 80.5%(718/898)(P = 0.96)。第 5 天和第 6 天玻璃化的超数囊胚平均分别为 1.5 ± 1.7 对 1.4 ± 1.9(P = 0.25)和 1.1 ± 1.1 对 0.9 ± 1.0(P = 0.45)。每个受精卵细胞的利用率为 46.1% 对 41.5%(P = 0.14)。181 名患者进行了 SET,生化妊娠率分别为 72.2%(65/90)和 62.7%(57/91)(P = 0.17)。每个新鲜移植周期的 CPR 为 51.1%(46/90)对 48.4%(44/91)[OR (95% CI) 1.11 (0.59-2.08), P = 0.710]。迄今为止,观察到的 CLBR 分别为 73.3%(66/90)和 67.0%(61/91)(P = 0.354)。每组中,都有 7 名没有活产的患者冷冻了剩余的囊胚。意向治疗组的 CPR 分别为 38.3% vs 38.6% [OR (95% CI) 0.98 (0.56-1.73),P = 0.967],培养温度为 36.6°C vs 37.1°C:研究结果的广泛意义:胚胎在培养至囊胚期期间往往能容忍温度偏差的微小变化,这一点从胚胎在两种略有不同的温度下具有相似的植入潜力中可以看出:试验注册号:NCT03548532:NCT03548532.Trial registration date: 23 October 2017.Date of first patient's enrolment:2017年11月10日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human reproduction
Human reproduction 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.60%
发文量
1369
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Human Reproduction features full-length, peer-reviewed papers reporting original research, concise clinical case reports, as well as opinions and debates on topical issues. Papers published cover the clinical science and medical aspects of reproductive physiology, pathology and endocrinology; including andrology, gonad function, gametogenesis, fertilization, embryo development, implantation, early pregnancy, genetics, genetic diagnosis, oncology, infectious disease, surgery, contraception, infertility treatment, psychology, ethics and social issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信