A nationwide survey on the safety of cricothyrotomy: a multicenter retrospective study in Japan.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Eisuke Booka, Hiroya Takeuchi, Hirotoshi Kikuchi, Akinori Miura, Mitsuro Kanda, Yoshihiko Kawaguchi, Yoichi Hamai, Motomi Nasu, Shinsuke Sato, Masazumi Inoue, Keisuke Okubo, Ryo Ogawa, Hiroshi Sato, Shigefumi Yoshino, Katsushi Takebayashi, Koji Kono, Yasushi Toh, Yukio Katori
{"title":"A nationwide survey on the safety of cricothyrotomy: a multicenter retrospective study in Japan.","authors":"Eisuke Booka, Hiroya Takeuchi, Hirotoshi Kikuchi, Akinori Miura, Mitsuro Kanda, Yoshihiko Kawaguchi, Yoichi Hamai, Motomi Nasu, Shinsuke Sato, Masazumi Inoue, Keisuke Okubo, Ryo Ogawa, Hiroshi Sato, Shigefumi Yoshino, Katsushi Takebayashi, Koji Kono, Yasushi Toh, Yukio Katori","doi":"10.1007/s10388-024-01082-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cricothyrotomy is a widely performed potentially life-saving treatment to secure an airway in emergencies. It is also a pneumonia-preventing treatment to secure an expectorant route in patients with difficulty self-expelling sputum; however, its safety and usefulness remain unclear. Thus, we conducted a nationwide survey of cricothyrotomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected and analyzed cricothyrotomy data from the institutions certified by the Japan Broncho-Esophagological Society or the Japanese Esophageal Society. Ultimately, 116 facilities responded to the survey and the present study included 1001 patients from 26 facilities who underwent cricothyrotomies from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cricothyrotomy was performed for sputum suctioning after esophagectomy or other surgical procedures in 945 (94.4%) cases and for emergency airway clearance in 48 (4.8%) cases. Complications during puncture were observed in 12 (1.2%) cases. We found significantly fewer complications during puncture for sputum suction (1.0%) compared with emergency airway clearance (4.2%) (p = 0.002), and also at the condition after esophagectomy (0.5%) compared with other surgical procedures (7.8%) (p < 0.001). Complications after puncture were observed in 45 (4.5%) cases, and we found significantly fewer complications after puncture at the condition after esophagectomy (4.2%) compared with other surgical procedures (11.8%) (p = 0.032). There were no significant differences in the type of kit used for complications during and after the puncture.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cricothyrotomy for prophylactic sputum suctioning after esophagectomy was safer compared to emergency airway clearance. However, future studies should verify the efficacy of cricothyrotomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11918,"journal":{"name":"Esophagus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-024-01082-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cricothyrotomy is a widely performed potentially life-saving treatment to secure an airway in emergencies. It is also a pneumonia-preventing treatment to secure an expectorant route in patients with difficulty self-expelling sputum; however, its safety and usefulness remain unclear. Thus, we conducted a nationwide survey of cricothyrotomy.

Methods: We retrospectively collected and analyzed cricothyrotomy data from the institutions certified by the Japan Broncho-Esophagological Society or the Japanese Esophageal Society. Ultimately, 116 facilities responded to the survey and the present study included 1001 patients from 26 facilities who underwent cricothyrotomies from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2021.

Results: Cricothyrotomy was performed for sputum suctioning after esophagectomy or other surgical procedures in 945 (94.4%) cases and for emergency airway clearance in 48 (4.8%) cases. Complications during puncture were observed in 12 (1.2%) cases. We found significantly fewer complications during puncture for sputum suction (1.0%) compared with emergency airway clearance (4.2%) (p = 0.002), and also at the condition after esophagectomy (0.5%) compared with other surgical procedures (7.8%) (p < 0.001). Complications after puncture were observed in 45 (4.5%) cases, and we found significantly fewer complications after puncture at the condition after esophagectomy (4.2%) compared with other surgical procedures (11.8%) (p = 0.032). There were no significant differences in the type of kit used for complications during and after the puncture.

Conclusions: Cricothyrotomy for prophylactic sputum suctioning after esophagectomy was safer compared to emergency airway clearance. However, future studies should verify the efficacy of cricothyrotomy.

Abstract Image

环甲膜切开术安全性的全国调查:日本多中心回顾性研究。
背景:环甲膜切开术是一种广泛采用的在紧急情况下确保气道通畅的潜在救生治疗方法。同时,环甲膜切开术也是一种预防肺炎的治疗方法,可确保痰液难以自行排出的患者获得祛痰途径;然而,其安全性和实用性仍不明确。因此,我们在全国范围内对环甲膜切开术进行了调查:我们回顾性地收集并分析了日本支气管食道学会或日本食道学会认证机构的环甲膜切开术数据。最终,116 家机构对调查做出了回应,本研究纳入了 26 家机构的 1001 名患者,这些患者在 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日期间接受了环甲膜切开术:945例(94.4%)环甲膜切开术是为了在食管切除术或其他手术后抽吸痰液,48例(4.8%)是为了紧急清理气道。穿刺过程中出现并发症的有 12 例(1.2%)。我们发现穿刺抽痰时的并发症(1.0%)明显少于紧急清理气道时的并发症(4.2%)(P = 0.002),食管切除术后的并发症(0.5%)也明显少于其他手术过程中的并发症(7.8%)(P 结论:穿刺抽痰时的并发症明显少于紧急清理气道时的并发症(P = 0.002):食管切除术后进行环甲膜切开术预防性吸痰比紧急气道清理术更安全。不过,未来的研究应验证环甲膜切开术的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Esophagus
Esophagus GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Esophagus, the official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, introduces practitioners and researchers to significant studies in the fields of benign and malignant diseases of the esophagus. The journal welcomes original articles, review articles, and short articles including technical notes ( How I do it ), which will be peer-reviewed by the editorial board. Letters to the editor are also welcome. Special articles on esophageal diseases will be provided by the editorial board, and proceedings of symposia and workshops will be included in special issues for the Annual Congress of the Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信