Long-term characterisation of the relationship between change in depression severity and change in inflammatory markers following inflammation-stratified treatment with vortioxetine augmented with celecoxib or placebo

IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
{"title":"Long-term characterisation of the relationship between change in depression severity and change in inflammatory markers following inflammation-stratified treatment with vortioxetine augmented with celecoxib or placebo","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bbi.2024.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent condition with a substantial incidence of relapse or treatment resistance. A subset of patients show evidence of low-grade inflammation, with these patients having a higher likelihood of more severe or difficult to treat courses of illness. Anti-inflammatory treatment of MDD has been investigated with mixed results, and no known studies have included assessments beyond cessation of the anti-inflammatory agent, meaning it remains unknown if any benefit from treatment persists. The objective of the present study was to investigate treatment outcomes up to 29 weeks post-cessation of celecoxib or placebo augmentation of an antidepressant, and how concentrations of selected inflammatory markers change over the same period.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The PREDDICT parallel-group, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (University of Adelaide, Australia) ran from December 2017 to April 2020. Participants with MDD were stratified into normal range or elevated inflammation strata according to screening concentrations of high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). Participants were randomised to treatment with vortioxetine and celecoxib or vortioxetine and placebo for six weeks, and vortioxetine alone for an additional 29 weeks (35 total weeks). Following a previous publication of results from the six-week RCT phase, exploratory analyses were performed on Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores, response and remission outcomes, and selected peripheral inflammatory markers across the entire study duration up to week 35.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants retained at each observation were baseline N=119, week 2 N=115, week 4 N=103, week 6 N=104, week 8 N=98, week 22 N=81, and week 35 N=60. Those in the elevated hsCRP celecoxib-augmented group had a statistically significantly greater reduction in MADRS score from baseline to week 35 compared to all other groups, demonstrating the greatest clinical improvement long-term, despite no group or strata differences at preceding time points. Response and remission outcomes did not differ by treatment group or hsCRP strata at any time point. Changes in hsCRP between baseline and week 35 and Tumour Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α) concentrations between baseline and week 6 and baseline and week 35 were statistically significantly associated with MADRS scores observed at week 6 and week 35 respectively, with reducing TNF-α concentrations associated with reducing MADRS scores and vice versa in each case. A post-hoc stratification of the participant cohort by baseline TNF-α concentrations led to significant prediction by the derived strata on clinical response at weeks 6, 8 and 35, with participants with elevated baseline TNF-α less likely to achieve clinical response.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>The present analysis suggests for the first time a possible longer-term clinical benefit of celecoxib augmentation of vortioxetine in inflammation-associated MDD treatment. However, further research is needed to confirm the finding and to ascertain the reason for such a delayed effect. Furthermore, the trial suggests that TNF-α may have a stronger relationship with anti-inflammatory MDD treatment outcomes than hsCRP, and should be investigated further for potential predictive utility.</p><p><strong>Clinical Trials Registration:</strong> Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), ACTRN12617000527369p. Registered on 11 April 2017, <span><span>http://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12617000527369p</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9199,"journal":{"name":"Brain, Behavior, and Immunity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088915912400597X/pdfft?md5=8e0dd42e9e6036c6e53c18bda2b2679b&pid=1-s2.0-S088915912400597X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain, Behavior, and Immunity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088915912400597X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent condition with a substantial incidence of relapse or treatment resistance. A subset of patients show evidence of low-grade inflammation, with these patients having a higher likelihood of more severe or difficult to treat courses of illness. Anti-inflammatory treatment of MDD has been investigated with mixed results, and no known studies have included assessments beyond cessation of the anti-inflammatory agent, meaning it remains unknown if any benefit from treatment persists. The objective of the present study was to investigate treatment outcomes up to 29 weeks post-cessation of celecoxib or placebo augmentation of an antidepressant, and how concentrations of selected inflammatory markers change over the same period.

Methods

The PREDDICT parallel-group, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (University of Adelaide, Australia) ran from December 2017 to April 2020. Participants with MDD were stratified into normal range or elevated inflammation strata according to screening concentrations of high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). Participants were randomised to treatment with vortioxetine and celecoxib or vortioxetine and placebo for six weeks, and vortioxetine alone for an additional 29 weeks (35 total weeks). Following a previous publication of results from the six-week RCT phase, exploratory analyses were performed on Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores, response and remission outcomes, and selected peripheral inflammatory markers across the entire study duration up to week 35.

Results

Participants retained at each observation were baseline N=119, week 2 N=115, week 4 N=103, week 6 N=104, week 8 N=98, week 22 N=81, and week 35 N=60. Those in the elevated hsCRP celecoxib-augmented group had a statistically significantly greater reduction in MADRS score from baseline to week 35 compared to all other groups, demonstrating the greatest clinical improvement long-term, despite no group or strata differences at preceding time points. Response and remission outcomes did not differ by treatment group or hsCRP strata at any time point. Changes in hsCRP between baseline and week 35 and Tumour Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α) concentrations between baseline and week 6 and baseline and week 35 were statistically significantly associated with MADRS scores observed at week 6 and week 35 respectively, with reducing TNF-α concentrations associated with reducing MADRS scores and vice versa in each case. A post-hoc stratification of the participant cohort by baseline TNF-α concentrations led to significant prediction by the derived strata on clinical response at weeks 6, 8 and 35, with participants with elevated baseline TNF-α less likely to achieve clinical response.

Interpretation

The present analysis suggests for the first time a possible longer-term clinical benefit of celecoxib augmentation of vortioxetine in inflammation-associated MDD treatment. However, further research is needed to confirm the finding and to ascertain the reason for such a delayed effect. Furthermore, the trial suggests that TNF-α may have a stronger relationship with anti-inflammatory MDD treatment outcomes than hsCRP, and should be investigated further for potential predictive utility.

Clinical Trials Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), ACTRN12617000527369p. Registered on 11 April 2017, http://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12617000527369p.

在使用伏替西汀和塞来昔布或安慰剂进行炎症分层治疗后,抑郁症严重程度的变化与炎症标志物变化之间的长期关系。
背景:重度抑郁障碍(MDD)是一种发病率很高的疾病,复发率或耐药性很高。一部分患者有低度炎症的迹象,这些患者更有可能出现更严重或更难治疗的病程。针对 MDD 的抗炎治疗研究结果不一,没有任何已知的研究包括停止使用抗炎药物后的评估,这意味着治疗的益处是否持续存在仍是未知数。本研究的目的是调查塞来昔布或安慰剂增强抗抑郁剂停药后长达29周的治疗效果,以及在此期间某些炎症标志物浓度的变化情况:PREDDICT平行组、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验(澳大利亚阿德莱德大学)从2017年12月开始至2020年4月结束。根据高敏C反应蛋白(hsCRP)的筛查浓度,将患有MDD的参与者分为正常范围和炎症升高两层。参与者被随机分配接受为期六周的伏替西汀和塞来昔布或伏替西汀和安慰剂治疗,以及为期29周(共35周)的单独伏替西汀治疗。在之前发表了为期六周的 RCT 阶段研究结果后,我们对蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表 (MADRS) 评分、反应和缓解结果以及直至第 35 周的整个研究期间的部分外周炎症标志物进行了探索性分析:每次观察保留的参与者人数分别为:基线119人,第2周115人,第4周103人,第6周104人,第8周98人,第22周81人,第35周60人。从基线到第35周,hsCRP升高的塞来昔布增强组患者的MADRS评分下降幅度在统计学上显著高于其他所有组别,尽管在前几个时间点没有组别或分层差异,但长期临床改善幅度最大。各治疗组或 hsCRP 分层在任何时间点的反应和缓解结果均无差异。基线与第35周之间的hsCRP变化以及基线与第6周之间和基线与第35周之间的肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)浓度变化分别与第6周和第35周观察到的MADRS评分有显著统计学相关性,TNF-α浓度降低与MADRS评分降低相关,反之亦然。根据基线TNF-α浓度对参与者队列进行事后分层后,得出的分层对第6周、第8周和第35周的临床反应有显著预测作用,基线TNF-α升高的参与者获得临床反应的可能性较低:本分析首次表明,在治疗与炎症相关的MDD时,塞来昔布增强伏替西汀可能具有更长期的临床疗效。然而,还需要进一步的研究来证实这一发现,并确定产生这种延迟效应的原因。此外,该试验还表明,与hsCRP相比,TNF-α与抗炎MDD治疗结果的关系可能更密切,因此应进一步研究其潜在的预测作用:澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心(ANZCTR),ACTRN12617000527369p。注册时间:2017年4月11日,http://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12617000527369p。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
29.60
自引率
2.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: Established in 1987, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity proudly serves as the official journal of the Psychoneuroimmunology Research Society (PNIRS). This pioneering journal is dedicated to publishing peer-reviewed basic, experimental, and clinical studies that explore the intricate interactions among behavioral, neural, endocrine, and immune systems in both humans and animals. As an international and interdisciplinary platform, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity focuses on original research spanning neuroscience, immunology, integrative physiology, behavioral biology, psychiatry, psychology, and clinical medicine. The journal is inclusive of research conducted at various levels, including molecular, cellular, social, and whole organism perspectives. With a commitment to efficiency, the journal facilitates online submission and review, ensuring timely publication of experimental results. Manuscripts typically undergo peer review and are returned to authors within 30 days of submission. It's worth noting that Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, published eight times a year, does not impose submission fees or page charges, fostering an open and accessible platform for scientific discourse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信