{"title":"Multi-institutional study examining intraoperative entrustment and resident sex","authors":"Samantha Baker , Julie Evans , Niki Matusko , Brenessa Lindeman , Sarah Jung , Sebin Choi , Rebecca Minter , Mackenzie Cook , Karen Brasel , Gurjit Sandhu","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Single-site studies have found variable associations between gender and entrustment-based interactions during surgical residency. We sought to assess the relationship between resident sex and intraoperative entrustment at multiple institutions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Surgical cases were observed at four university-based training programs. Faculty entrustment and resident entrustability were rated using OpTrust. OpTrust is a validated intraoperative entrustment measurement tool which enables trained third-party raters to objectively score resident and faculty behaviors in the operating room. Independent sample t-tests and regression analysis with cluster adjusted standard errors were used.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>337 cases were observed which included 149 residents (54 % female) and 97 faculty members (30 % female). There was no difference in resident entrustability based on resident sex (p = 0.30). Female residents were more likely to be involved in cases rated as more difficult (p = 0.04). At a single site, male residents scored higher on resident entrustability (p = 0.007) and faculty entrustment (p = 0.022).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Entrustment did not differ based on resident sex on a multi-institutional scale; however, at a single site, there was a difference; suggesting there are multi-factorial issues contributing to differences in training.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 115925"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000296102400477X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Single-site studies have found variable associations between gender and entrustment-based interactions during surgical residency. We sought to assess the relationship between resident sex and intraoperative entrustment at multiple institutions.
Methods
Surgical cases were observed at four university-based training programs. Faculty entrustment and resident entrustability were rated using OpTrust. OpTrust is a validated intraoperative entrustment measurement tool which enables trained third-party raters to objectively score resident and faculty behaviors in the operating room. Independent sample t-tests and regression analysis with cluster adjusted standard errors were used.
Results
337 cases were observed which included 149 residents (54 % female) and 97 faculty members (30 % female). There was no difference in resident entrustability based on resident sex (p = 0.30). Female residents were more likely to be involved in cases rated as more difficult (p = 0.04). At a single site, male residents scored higher on resident entrustability (p = 0.007) and faculty entrustment (p = 0.022).
Conclusion
Entrustment did not differ based on resident sex on a multi-institutional scale; however, at a single site, there was a difference; suggesting there are multi-factorial issues contributing to differences in training.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.