CSF neurogranin levels as a biomarker in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a cross-sectional analysis.

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Vanesa Jurasova, Ross Andel, Alzbeta Katonova, Katerina Veverova, Terezie Zuntychova, Hana Horakova, Martin Vyhnalek, Tereza Kolarova, Vaclav Matoska, Kaj Blennow, Jakub Hort
{"title":"CSF neurogranin levels as a biomarker in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a cross-sectional analysis.","authors":"Vanesa Jurasova, Ross Andel, Alzbeta Katonova, Katerina Veverova, Terezie Zuntychova, Hana Horakova, Martin Vyhnalek, Tereza Kolarova, Vaclav Matoska, Kaj Blennow, Jakub Hort","doi":"10.1186/s13195-024-01566-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is initial evidence suggesting that biomarker neurogranin (Ng) may distinguish Alzheimer's disease (AD) from other neurodegenerative diseases. Therefore, we assessed (a) the discriminant ability of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Ng levels to distinguish between AD and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) pathology and between different stages within the same disease, (b) the relationship between Ng levels and cognitive performance in both AD and FTLD pathology, and (c) whether CSF Ng levels vary by apolipoprotein E (APOE) polymorphism in the AD continuum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) (n = 33), amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) due to AD (n = 109), AD dementia (n = 67), MCI due to FTLD (n = 25), and FTLD dementia (n = 29) were recruited from the Czech Brain Aging Study. One-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) assessed Ng levels in diagnostic subgroups. Linear regressions evaluated the relationship between CSF Ng levels, memory scores, and APOE polymorphism.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ng levels were higher in aMCI-AD patients compared to MCI-FTLD (F[1, 134] = 15.16, p < .001), and in AD-dementia compared to FTLD-dementia (F[1, 96] = 4.60, p = .029). Additionally, Ng levels were higher in FTLD-dementia patients compared to MCI-FTLD (F[1, 54]= 4.35, p = .034), lower in SCD participants compared to aMCI-AD (F[1, 142] = 10.72, p = .001) and AD-dementia (F[1, 100] = 20.90, p < .001), and did not differ between SCD participants and MCI-FTLD (F[1, 58]= 1.02, p = .491) or FTLD-dementia (F[1, 62]= 2.27, p = .051). The main effect of diagnosis across the diagnostic subgroups on Aβ<sub>1-42</sub>/Ng ratio was significant too (F[4, 263]=, p < .001). We found a non-significant association between Ng levels and memory scores overall (β=-0.25, p = .154) or in AD diagnostic subgroups, and non-significant differences in this association between overall AD APOE ε4 carriers and non-carriers (β=-0.32, p = .358).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this first study to-date to assess MCI and dementia due to AD or FTLD within one study, elevated CSF Ng appears to be an early biomarker of AD-related impairment, but its role as a biomarker appears to diminish after dementia diagnosis, whereby dementia-related underlying processes in AD and FTLD may begin to merge. The Aβ<sub>1-42</sub>/Ng ratio discriminated AD from FTLD patients better than Ng alone. CSF Ng levels were not related to memory in AD or FTLD, suggesting that Ng may be a marker of the biological signs of disease state rather than cognitive deficits.</p>","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":"16 1","pages":"199"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11378641/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-024-01566-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is initial evidence suggesting that biomarker neurogranin (Ng) may distinguish Alzheimer's disease (AD) from other neurodegenerative diseases. Therefore, we assessed (a) the discriminant ability of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Ng levels to distinguish between AD and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) pathology and between different stages within the same disease, (b) the relationship between Ng levels and cognitive performance in both AD and FTLD pathology, and (c) whether CSF Ng levels vary by apolipoprotein E (APOE) polymorphism in the AD continuum.

Methods: Participants with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) (n = 33), amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) due to AD (n = 109), AD dementia (n = 67), MCI due to FTLD (n = 25), and FTLD dementia (n = 29) were recruited from the Czech Brain Aging Study. One-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) assessed Ng levels in diagnostic subgroups. Linear regressions evaluated the relationship between CSF Ng levels, memory scores, and APOE polymorphism.

Results: Ng levels were higher in aMCI-AD patients compared to MCI-FTLD (F[1, 134] = 15.16, p < .001), and in AD-dementia compared to FTLD-dementia (F[1, 96] = 4.60, p = .029). Additionally, Ng levels were higher in FTLD-dementia patients compared to MCI-FTLD (F[1, 54]= 4.35, p = .034), lower in SCD participants compared to aMCI-AD (F[1, 142] = 10.72, p = .001) and AD-dementia (F[1, 100] = 20.90, p < .001), and did not differ between SCD participants and MCI-FTLD (F[1, 58]= 1.02, p = .491) or FTLD-dementia (F[1, 62]= 2.27, p = .051). The main effect of diagnosis across the diagnostic subgroups on Aβ1-42/Ng ratio was significant too (F[4, 263]=, p < .001). We found a non-significant association between Ng levels and memory scores overall (β=-0.25, p = .154) or in AD diagnostic subgroups, and non-significant differences in this association between overall AD APOE ε4 carriers and non-carriers (β=-0.32, p = .358).

Conclusions: In this first study to-date to assess MCI and dementia due to AD or FTLD within one study, elevated CSF Ng appears to be an early biomarker of AD-related impairment, but its role as a biomarker appears to diminish after dementia diagnosis, whereby dementia-related underlying processes in AD and FTLD may begin to merge. The Aβ1-42/Ng ratio discriminated AD from FTLD patients better than Ng alone. CSF Ng levels were not related to memory in AD or FTLD, suggesting that Ng may be a marker of the biological signs of disease state rather than cognitive deficits.

作为阿尔茨海默病和额颞叶变性的生物标志物的脑脊液神经粒蛋白水平:横断面分析。
背景:有初步证据表明,生物标志物神经粒蛋白(Ng)可区分阿尔茨海默病(AD)和其他神经退行性疾病。因此,我们评估了:(a) 脑脊液(CSF)Ng水平在区分AD和额颞叶变性(FTLD)病理以及同一疾病不同阶段之间的鉴别能力;(b) 在AD和FTLD病理中Ng水平与认知能力之间的关系;(c) 脑脊液Ng水平是否随AD连续体中载脂蛋白E(APOE)多态性的不同而变化:方法:从捷克脑老化研究(Czech Brain Aging Study)中招募患有主观认知功能下降(SCD)(n = 33)、AD导致的记忆性轻度认知障碍(aMCI)(n = 109)、AD痴呆(n = 67)、FTLD导致的MCI(n = 25)和FTLD痴呆(n = 29)的参与者。单向协方差分析(ANCOVA)评估了诊断亚组中的Ng水平。线性回归评估了 CSF Ng 水平、记忆评分和 APOE 多态性之间的关系:结果:与 MCI-FTLD 相比,aMCI-AD 患者的 Ng 水平更高(F[1, 134]= 15.16, p 1-42/Ng 比率也很显著(F[4, 263]=, p 结论:Ng 水平在 MCI-FTLD 患者中更高:在这项迄今为止首次在一项研究中评估MCI和AD或FTLD导致的痴呆的研究中,CSF Ng的升高似乎是AD相关损伤的早期生物标志物,但其作为生物标志物的作用在痴呆诊断后似乎会减弱,AD和FTLD中与痴呆相关的潜在过程可能开始融合。Aβ1-42/Ng比值比单独使用Ng更能区分AD和FTLD患者。CSF Ng水平与AD或FTLD患者的记忆力无关,这表明Ng可能是疾病状态的生物学标志,而不是认知缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 医学-神经病学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
172
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's Research & Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal that focuses on translational research into Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases. It publishes open-access basic research, clinical trials, drug discovery and development studies, and epidemiologic studies. The journal also includes reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, debates, and reports. All articles published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy are included in several reputable databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science) and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信