Numerical investigation of aerodynamic characteristics in tandem cascades with various curving strategies

IF 5 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE
{"title":"Numerical investigation of aerodynamic characteristics in tandem cascades with various curving strategies","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ast.2024.109548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Tandem configurations with curved blades can improve the flow field in compressor cascades. This study conducts a numerical investigation into the impact of various curving strategies on the losses and flow structures within tandem cascades. Curving strategies of three distinct configurations (curving both blades, solely the rear blade, and solely the front blade) along with three curved angles (5°, 10°, and 15°) are compared. Four primary vortex structures are causing losses in the tandem cascades. Loss weight coefficients, derived from each vortex, are adopted to quantify the proportion of losses. All curving strategies mitigate the accumulation of low-energy fluid near the endwalls, weakening the passage vortex. Various curving strategies have different effects on losses of the endwall spanwise vortex and trailing edge shedding vortices. The influence of curved angles on the three configurations indicates that curving both blades at 5° and curving the front blade at 5° or 10° can mitigate losses. An increasing loss is observed when the rear blade curves at any angle alone. Curving both blades or only the front blade mitigates the corner separation while the curved rear blade exacerbates it. The novelty of this study lies in applying topology analysis to establish correlations between losses, vortices, and topological configurations. This approach is a pivotal research methodology for elucidating the underlying mechanisms of loss generation and vortex dynamics within curved tandem cascades.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50955,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1270963824006783","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tandem configurations with curved blades can improve the flow field in compressor cascades. This study conducts a numerical investigation into the impact of various curving strategies on the losses and flow structures within tandem cascades. Curving strategies of three distinct configurations (curving both blades, solely the rear blade, and solely the front blade) along with three curved angles (5°, 10°, and 15°) are compared. Four primary vortex structures are causing losses in the tandem cascades. Loss weight coefficients, derived from each vortex, are adopted to quantify the proportion of losses. All curving strategies mitigate the accumulation of low-energy fluid near the endwalls, weakening the passage vortex. Various curving strategies have different effects on losses of the endwall spanwise vortex and trailing edge shedding vortices. The influence of curved angles on the three configurations indicates that curving both blades at 5° and curving the front blade at 5° or 10° can mitigate losses. An increasing loss is observed when the rear blade curves at any angle alone. Curving both blades or only the front blade mitigates the corner separation while the curved rear blade exacerbates it. The novelty of this study lies in applying topology analysis to establish correlations between losses, vortices, and topological configurations. This approach is a pivotal research methodology for elucidating the underlying mechanisms of loss generation and vortex dynamics within curved tandem cascades.

采用不同弯道策略的串联级联气动特性的数值研究
带弯曲叶片的串联配置可以改善压缩机级联中的流场。本研究对各种弯曲策略对串联级联中的损耗和流动结构的影响进行了数值研究。比较了三种不同配置的弯曲策略(两个叶片弯曲、仅后叶片弯曲和仅前叶片弯曲)以及三种弯曲角度(5°、10° 和 15°)。在串联级联中,有四种主要涡流结构会造成损失。根据每个涡流得出的损耗重量系数被用来量化损耗的比例。所有弯道策略都能缓解低能流体在端壁附近的积聚,从而削弱通道涡流。各种弯曲策略对端壁跨向涡和后缘脱落涡的损失有不同的影响。弯角对三种配置的影响表明,将两个叶片弯成 5° 和将前叶片弯成 5° 或 10° 可以减少损失。当后叶片单独以任何角度弯曲时,损失都会增加。弯曲两个叶片或仅弯曲前叶片可减轻转角分离,而弯曲后叶片则会加剧转角分离。这项研究的新颖之处在于应用拓扑分析来建立损耗、涡流和拓扑结构之间的相关性。这种方法是一种关键的研究方法,可用于阐明曲面串联级联中损耗产生和涡流动力学的基本机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aerospace Science and Technology
Aerospace Science and Technology 工程技术-工程:宇航
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
28.60%
发文量
654
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Aerospace Science and Technology publishes articles of outstanding scientific quality. Each article is reviewed by two referees. The journal welcomes papers from a wide range of countries. This journal publishes original papers, review articles and short communications related to all fields of aerospace research, fundamental and applied, potential applications of which are clearly related to: • The design and the manufacture of aircraft, helicopters, missiles, launchers and satellites • The control of their environment • The study of various systems they are involved in, as supports or as targets. Authors are invited to submit papers on new advances in the following topics to aerospace applications: • Fluid dynamics • Energetics and propulsion • Materials and structures • Flight mechanics • Navigation, guidance and control • Acoustics • Optics • Electromagnetism and radar • Signal and image processing • Information processing • Data fusion • Decision aid • Human behaviour • Robotics and intelligent systems • Complex system engineering. Etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信