Comparison of the Effect of Pump Flow Type (Pulsatile or Non-Pulsatile) on Postoperative Neurocognitive Functions in Coronary Artery Surgery.

Ferhat Borulu, Bilgehan Erkut
{"title":"Comparison of the Effect of Pump Flow Type (Pulsatile or Non-Pulsatile) on Postoperative Neurocognitive Functions in Coronary Artery Surgery.","authors":"Ferhat Borulu, Bilgehan Erkut","doi":"10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The effect of pump flow type on perfusion in coronary surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is discussed. We aimed to evaluate the effect of pump flow type on cognitive functions with neurocognitive function tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass surgery between November 2020 and July 2021 were divided into two equa groups. Groups were formed according to pump flow type pulsatile (Group 1) and non-pulsatile (Group 2). Clock drawing test (CDT) and standardized mini mental test (SMMT) were performed on the patients in both groups in the preoperative period, on the 1st preoperative day, and on the day before discharge. Neurocognitive effects were compared with all follow-up parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no difference between the groups in terms of demographic data and in terms of neurocognitive tests performed before the operation. SMMT on postoperative day 1 (Group I: 27.64 ± 1.05; Group II: 24.44 ± 1.64; P=0.001) and CDT (Group I: 5.4 ± 0.54; Group II: 4 .66 ± 0.52; P=0.001), and SMMT on the day before discharge (Group I: 27.92 ± 1.16; Group II: 24.66 ± 1.22; P=0.001) and CDT (Group I: 5 It was calculated as .66 ± 0.48; Group II: 5.44 ± 0.5; P=0.001). The duration of intensive care and hospitalization were higher in the non-pulsatile group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We think that the type of pump flow used in coronary artery bypass surgery using CPB is effective in terms of neurocognitive functions and that pulsatile flow makes positive contributions to this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":72457,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11379152/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The effect of pump flow type on perfusion in coronary surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is discussed. We aimed to evaluate the effect of pump flow type on cognitive functions with neurocognitive function tests.

Methods: One hundred patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass surgery between November 2020 and July 2021 were divided into two equa groups. Groups were formed according to pump flow type pulsatile (Group 1) and non-pulsatile (Group 2). Clock drawing test (CDT) and standardized mini mental test (SMMT) were performed on the patients in both groups in the preoperative period, on the 1st preoperative day, and on the day before discharge. Neurocognitive effects were compared with all follow-up parameters.

Results: There was no difference between the groups in terms of demographic data and in terms of neurocognitive tests performed before the operation. SMMT on postoperative day 1 (Group I: 27.64 ± 1.05; Group II: 24.44 ± 1.64; P=0.001) and CDT (Group I: 5.4 ± 0.54; Group II: 4 .66 ± 0.52; P=0.001), and SMMT on the day before discharge (Group I: 27.92 ± 1.16; Group II: 24.66 ± 1.22; P=0.001) and CDT (Group I: 5 It was calculated as .66 ± 0.48; Group II: 5.44 ± 0.5; P=0.001). The duration of intensive care and hospitalization were higher in the non-pulsatile group.

Conclusion: We think that the type of pump flow used in coronary artery bypass surgery using CPB is effective in terms of neurocognitive functions and that pulsatile flow makes positive contributions to this issue.

比较泵流类型(脉动或非脉动)对冠状动脉手术术后神经认知功能的影响
导言:我们讨论了使用心肺旁路(CPB)的冠状动脉手术中泵流量类型对灌注的影响。我们旨在通过神经认知功能测试评估泵流类型对认知功能的影响:将 2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 7 月期间接受孤立冠状动脉搭桥手术的 100 名患者分为两个等量组。根据泵流量类型分为脉动组(第1组)和非脉动组(第2组)。两组患者分别在术前、术前第 1 天和出院前一天进行了时钟画图测试(CDT)和标准化小型智力测试(SMMT)。将神经认知效果与所有随访参数进行比较:结果:两组患者在人口统计学数据和术前神经认知测试方面均无差异。术后第 1 天的 SMMT(I 组:27.64 ± 1.05;II 组:24.44 ± 1.64;P=0.001)和 CDT(I 组:5.4 ± 0.54;II 组:4.66 ± 0.52;P=0.001),以及出院前一天的 SMMT(I 组:27.92 ± 1.16;II 组:24.66 ± 1.22;P=0.001)和 CDT(I 组:5 计算结果为 .66 ± 0.48;II 组:5.44 ± 0.5;P=0.001)。非脉动组的重症监护和住院时间更长:我们认为,在使用 CPB 的冠状动脉搭桥手术中使用的泵流类型对神经认知功能有效,而搏动性血流在这一问题上做出了积极贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信