School absence policy and healthcare use: a difference-in-difference cohort analysis.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Kirsti Wahlberg, Kristine Pape, Bjarne Austad, Andreas Asheim, Kjartan S Anthun, Johan H Bjørngaard, Gunnhild Å Vie
{"title":"School absence policy and healthcare use: a difference-in-difference cohort analysis.","authors":"Kirsti Wahlberg, Kristine Pape, Bjarne Austad, Andreas Asheim, Kjartan S Anthun, Johan H Bjørngaard, Gunnhild Å Vie","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmae042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A national policy in Norway demanding certificates for medical absences in upper secondary school was implemented in 2016, leading to an increase in general practitioner (GP) visits in this age group.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the policy's effect on the use of primary and specialist healthcare.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort study following all Norwegian youth aged 14-21 in the years 2010-2019 using a difference-in-differences approach comparing exposed cohorts expected to attend upper secondary school after the policy change in 2016 with previous unexposed cohorts. Data were collected from national registries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The absence policy led to the increased number of contacts with GPs for exposed cohorts during all exposed years, with estimated incidence rate ratios (IRRs) in the range from 1.14 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.11-1.18) to 1.25 (95% CI 1.21-1.30). Consultations for respiratory tract infections increased during exposed years. However, there was no conclusive policy-related difference in mental health consultations with GPs. In specialist healthcare we did not find conclusive evidence of an effect of absence policy on the risk of any contact per school year, but there was a slightly increased risk of contacts with ear-nose-throat specialist services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found an increase in general practice contacts attributable to the school absence policy. Apart from a possible increase in ear-nose-throat contacts, increased GP attention did not increase specialized healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmae042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A national policy in Norway demanding certificates for medical absences in upper secondary school was implemented in 2016, leading to an increase in general practitioner (GP) visits in this age group.

Objectives: To assess the policy's effect on the use of primary and specialist healthcare.

Methods: A cohort study following all Norwegian youth aged 14-21 in the years 2010-2019 using a difference-in-differences approach comparing exposed cohorts expected to attend upper secondary school after the policy change in 2016 with previous unexposed cohorts. Data were collected from national registries.

Results: The absence policy led to the increased number of contacts with GPs for exposed cohorts during all exposed years, with estimated incidence rate ratios (IRRs) in the range from 1.14 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.11-1.18) to 1.25 (95% CI 1.21-1.30). Consultations for respiratory tract infections increased during exposed years. However, there was no conclusive policy-related difference in mental health consultations with GPs. In specialist healthcare we did not find conclusive evidence of an effect of absence policy on the risk of any contact per school year, but there was a slightly increased risk of contacts with ear-nose-throat specialist services.

Conclusions: We found an increase in general practice contacts attributable to the school absence policy. Apart from a possible increase in ear-nose-throat contacts, increased GP attention did not increase specialized healthcare.

缺课政策与医疗保健的使用:差异队列分析。
背景挪威于2016年实施了一项要求高中生出具缺勤证明的国家政策,导致该年龄段的全科医生(GP)就诊率上升:评估该政策对使用初级和专科医疗服务的影响:对2010-2019年期间所有14-21岁的挪威青少年进行队列研究,采用 "差异中的差异 "方法,将2016年政策变化后预计将就读高中的受影响队列与之前未受影响的队列进行比较。数据来自国家登记处:缺课政策导致暴露人群在所有暴露年份中接触全科医生的次数增加,估计发病率比(IRR)在 1.14(95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.11-1.18] 到 1.25(95% CI 1.21-1.30)之间。在暴露年份,因呼吸道感染而就诊的人数有所增加。然而,在全科医生的心理健康咨询方面,并没有发现与政策相关的确凿差异。在专科医疗方面,我们没有发现缺课政策对每学年任何接触风险产生影响的确凿证据,但接触耳鼻喉专科服务的风险略有增加:结论:我们发现,缺课政策增加了全科医生的接诊次数。除了耳鼻喉科就诊人次可能增加外,全科医生关注度的提高并没有增加专科医疗服务的就诊人次。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family practice
Family practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries. Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration. The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信