Who are the green transition experts? Towards a new research agenda on climate change knowledge

Søren Lund Frandsen, Jacob A. Hasselbalch
{"title":"Who are the green transition experts? Towards a new research agenda on climate change knowledge","authors":"Søren Lund Frandsen, Jacob A. Hasselbalch","doi":"10.1002/wcc.917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Experts play a significant role in shaping global and local norms on how societies should respond to the climate crisis. However, current scholarship on the relationship between expertise and climate change has not fully addressed recent transformations in the field, specifically the emergence and increasingly influential role of what we term “green transition expertise.” We define green transition expertise as a more applied, normative, and contextual form of climate change knowledge that is contrasted with the formalized, pure science of “climate expertise.” If climate experts assess the deteriorating state of the global climate, then transition experts tell states and corporations what they should do about it. We argue that if the social science of climate change knowledge is to further deepen its grasp of the politics of the green transition analytically and normatively, it must embrace a “post‐IPCC” research agenda that turns increasingly toward studying the power of transition experts in directing state and corporate climate action. Based on a review of the literature, we contrast the extant IPCC agenda with an emerging post‐IPCC agenda along three dimensions: expert cast (who are the experts?), expert content (what do they know?) and expert context (where are they located?). By marking a shift in each of these dimensions, the post‐IPCC agenda sensitizes the social science of climate change knowledge to overlooked and increasingly powerful forms of experts and expertise. To facilitate their study, we define six specific areas that require detailed attention as the post‐IPCC agenda develops.This article is categorized under:<jats:list list-type=\"simple\"> <jats:list-item>The Social Status of Climate Change Knowledge &gt; Sociology/Anthropology of Climate Knowledge</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Policy and Governance &gt; National Climate Change Policy</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Climate, History, Society, Culture &gt; Ideas and Knowledge</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":501019,"journal":{"name":"WIREs Climate Change","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIREs Climate Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Experts play a significant role in shaping global and local norms on how societies should respond to the climate crisis. However, current scholarship on the relationship between expertise and climate change has not fully addressed recent transformations in the field, specifically the emergence and increasingly influential role of what we term “green transition expertise.” We define green transition expertise as a more applied, normative, and contextual form of climate change knowledge that is contrasted with the formalized, pure science of “climate expertise.” If climate experts assess the deteriorating state of the global climate, then transition experts tell states and corporations what they should do about it. We argue that if the social science of climate change knowledge is to further deepen its grasp of the politics of the green transition analytically and normatively, it must embrace a “post‐IPCC” research agenda that turns increasingly toward studying the power of transition experts in directing state and corporate climate action. Based on a review of the literature, we contrast the extant IPCC agenda with an emerging post‐IPCC agenda along three dimensions: expert cast (who are the experts?), expert content (what do they know?) and expert context (where are they located?). By marking a shift in each of these dimensions, the post‐IPCC agenda sensitizes the social science of climate change knowledge to overlooked and increasingly powerful forms of experts and expertise. To facilitate their study, we define six specific areas that require detailed attention as the post‐IPCC agenda develops.This article is categorized under: The Social Status of Climate Change Knowledge > Sociology/Anthropology of Climate Knowledge Policy and Governance > National Climate Change Policy Climate, History, Society, Culture > Ideas and Knowledge
谁是绿色转型专家?制定新的气候变化知识研究议程
专家们在形成全球和地方规范方面发挥着重要作用,这些规范涉及社会应如何应对气候危机。然而,目前关于专业知识与气候变化之间关系的学术研究并没有充分考虑到该领域最近发生的变化,特别是我们称之为 "绿色转型专业知识 "的出现和越来越有影响力的作用。我们将绿色转型专业知识定义为一种更具应用性、规范性和背景性的气候变化知识,与 "气候专业知识 "的正规化、纯科学形成对比。如果说气候专家评估的是全球气候不断恶化的状况,那么转型专家告诉国家和企业应该如何应对。我们认为,如果气候变化知识的社会科学要在分析和规范方面进一步加深对绿色转型政治的把握,就必须接受 "后国际气候专委会 "的研究议程,越来越多地转向研究转型专家在指导国家和企业气候行动方面的力量。基于对文献的回顾,我们将现有的 IPCC 议程与新兴的后 IPCC 议程从三个方面进行对比:专家阵容(谁是专家?后国际气候变化专门委员会议程标志着这些维度中每一个维度的转变,使气候变化知识的社会科学关注被忽视的、日益强大的专家和专业知识形式。为便于研究,我们定义了六个具体领域,随着后国际气候变化专门委员会议程的发展,这些领域需要详细关注:气候变化知识的社会地位> 气候知识社会学/人类学 政策与治理> 国家气候变化政策 气候、历史、社会、文化> 思想与知识
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信