Peer Review Is Primary: Presentations, Publications, Promotions, and Practice.

PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) Pub Date : 2024-08-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.22454/PRiMER.2024.148162
Kendall M Campbell, Edgar Figueroa, Donna Baluchi, José E Rodríguez
{"title":"Peer Review Is Primary: Presentations, Publications, Promotions, and Practice.","authors":"Kendall M Campbell, Edgar Figueroa, Donna Baluchi, José E Rodríguez","doi":"10.22454/PRiMER.2024.148162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peer review is primarily thought of as the process used to determine whether manuscripts are published in medical or other academic journals. While a publication may be one outcome of peer review, this article shares a model of 4 Ps to remind faculty of some important additional applications of peer review. The 4 Ps are publication, presentation, promotion, and practice. The medical literature offers few reasons why faculty should get involved in peer review. In this article, we define peer review, illustrate the role of peer review in four important processes, describe how the volume of material to review has changed over time, and share how participation in these processes promotes career advancement. Understanding the peer review process and its benefits can encourage professionals to participate in peer review in any of the four Ps as they recognize the benefits to their discipline and their career.</p>","PeriodicalId":74494,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","volume":"8 ","pages":"42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377078/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2024.148162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peer review is primarily thought of as the process used to determine whether manuscripts are published in medical or other academic journals. While a publication may be one outcome of peer review, this article shares a model of 4 Ps to remind faculty of some important additional applications of peer review. The 4 Ps are publication, presentation, promotion, and practice. The medical literature offers few reasons why faculty should get involved in peer review. In this article, we define peer review, illustrate the role of peer review in four important processes, describe how the volume of material to review has changed over time, and share how participation in these processes promotes career advancement. Understanding the peer review process and its benefits can encourage professionals to participate in peer review in any of the four Ps as they recognize the benefits to their discipline and their career.

同行评审至上:演讲、出版物、晋升和实践。
同行评审主要被认为是决定手稿是否在医学或其他学术期刊上发表的过程。虽然发表文章可能是同行评审的一个结果,但本文分享了一个 4 P 模型,以提醒教师同行评审的其他一些重要应用。这 4 个 P 指的是发表、展示、晋升和实践。医学文献几乎没有给出教员参与同行评议的理由。在本文中,我们将定义同行评议,说明同行评议在四个重要过程中的作用,描述需要评议的材料数量是如何随着时间的推移而变化的,并分享参与这些过程是如何促进职业发展的。了解同行评审过程及其益处,可以鼓励专业人士参与四个阶段中任何一个阶段的同行评审,因为他们认识到这对他们的学科和职业生涯都有益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信