Kendall M Campbell, Edgar Figueroa, Donna Baluchi, José E Rodríguez
{"title":"Peer Review Is Primary: Presentations, Publications, Promotions, and Practice.","authors":"Kendall M Campbell, Edgar Figueroa, Donna Baluchi, José E Rodríguez","doi":"10.22454/PRiMER.2024.148162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peer review is primarily thought of as the process used to determine whether manuscripts are published in medical or other academic journals. While a publication may be one outcome of peer review, this article shares a model of 4 Ps to remind faculty of some important additional applications of peer review. The 4 Ps are publication, presentation, promotion, and practice. The medical literature offers few reasons why faculty should get involved in peer review. In this article, we define peer review, illustrate the role of peer review in four important processes, describe how the volume of material to review has changed over time, and share how participation in these processes promotes career advancement. Understanding the peer review process and its benefits can encourage professionals to participate in peer review in any of the four Ps as they recognize the benefits to their discipline and their career.</p>","PeriodicalId":74494,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","volume":"8 ","pages":"42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377078/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2024.148162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Peer review is primarily thought of as the process used to determine whether manuscripts are published in medical or other academic journals. While a publication may be one outcome of peer review, this article shares a model of 4 Ps to remind faculty of some important additional applications of peer review. The 4 Ps are publication, presentation, promotion, and practice. The medical literature offers few reasons why faculty should get involved in peer review. In this article, we define peer review, illustrate the role of peer review in four important processes, describe how the volume of material to review has changed over time, and share how participation in these processes promotes career advancement. Understanding the peer review process and its benefits can encourage professionals to participate in peer review in any of the four Ps as they recognize the benefits to their discipline and their career.
同行评审主要被认为是决定手稿是否在医学或其他学术期刊上发表的过程。虽然发表文章可能是同行评审的一个结果,但本文分享了一个 4 P 模型,以提醒教师同行评审的其他一些重要应用。这 4 个 P 指的是发表、展示、晋升和实践。医学文献几乎没有给出教员参与同行评议的理由。在本文中,我们将定义同行评议,说明同行评议在四个重要过程中的作用,描述需要评议的材料数量是如何随着时间的推移而变化的,并分享参与这些过程是如何促进职业发展的。了解同行评审过程及其益处,可以鼓励专业人士参与四个阶段中任何一个阶段的同行评审,因为他们认识到这对他们的学科和职业生涯都有益处。