Workplace Bullying Experiences of Nurses From Diverse Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Groups.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
David C Mohr, Shari N Dade, Nancy J Yanchus, Chloe A Bell, Sheila Cox Sullivan, Katerine Osatuke
{"title":"Workplace Bullying Experiences of Nurses From Diverse Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Groups.","authors":"David C Mohr, Shari N Dade, Nancy J Yanchus, Chloe A Bell, Sheila Cox Sullivan, Katerine Osatuke","doi":"10.1111/jan.16431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine nurse workplace bullying relative to diverse sexual orientation and gender identity groups.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using an annual organisational satisfaction survey from 2022, we identified free-text comments provided by nurses (N = 25,337). We identified and themed comments for specific bullying content among unique respondents (n = 1432). We also examined close-ended questions that captured organisational constructs, such as job satisfaction and burnout. We looked at differences by comparing diverse sexual orientation and gender identity groups to the majority using both qualitative and quantitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the free-text comments, themed categories reflected the type of bullying, the perpetrator and perceived impact. Disrespect was the most frequent theme with supervisors being the primary perpetrator. The reported bullying themes and workplace perceptions differed between nurses in the diverse gender identity and sexual orientation group compared to other groups. Nurses who reported bullying also reported higher turnover intent, burnout, lower workplace civility, more dissatisfaction and lower self-authenticity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Diverse sexual orientation and gender identity groups are understudied in the nurse bullying research, likely because of sensitivities around identification. Our design enabled anonymous assessment of these groups. We suggest practices to help alleviate and mitigate the prevalence of bullying in nursing.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>No Patient or Public Contribution.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>We examined differences in perceptions of nurse bullying between diverse sexual orientation and gender identity groups compared to majority groups. Group differences were found both for thematic qualitative content and workplace experience ratings with members of minority groups reporting less favourable workplace experiences. Nurse leaders and staff can benefit from learning about best practices to eliminate bullying among this population.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>STROBE guidelines for cross-sectional observational studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16431","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To examine nurse workplace bullying relative to diverse sexual orientation and gender identity groups.

Design: Observational cross-sectional study.

Methods: Using an annual organisational satisfaction survey from 2022, we identified free-text comments provided by nurses (N = 25,337). We identified and themed comments for specific bullying content among unique respondents (n = 1432). We also examined close-ended questions that captured organisational constructs, such as job satisfaction and burnout. We looked at differences by comparing diverse sexual orientation and gender identity groups to the majority using both qualitative and quantitative data.

Results: For the free-text comments, themed categories reflected the type of bullying, the perpetrator and perceived impact. Disrespect was the most frequent theme with supervisors being the primary perpetrator. The reported bullying themes and workplace perceptions differed between nurses in the diverse gender identity and sexual orientation group compared to other groups. Nurses who reported bullying also reported higher turnover intent, burnout, lower workplace civility, more dissatisfaction and lower self-authenticity.

Conclusion: Diverse sexual orientation and gender identity groups are understudied in the nurse bullying research, likely because of sensitivities around identification. Our design enabled anonymous assessment of these groups. We suggest practices to help alleviate and mitigate the prevalence of bullying in nursing.

Patient or public contribution: No Patient or Public Contribution.

Impact: We examined differences in perceptions of nurse bullying between diverse sexual orientation and gender identity groups compared to majority groups. Group differences were found both for thematic qualitative content and workplace experience ratings with members of minority groups reporting less favourable workplace experiences. Nurse leaders and staff can benefit from learning about best practices to eliminate bullying among this population.

Reporting method: STROBE guidelines for cross-sectional observational studies.

来自不同性取向和性别认同群体的护士在工作场所遭受欺凌的经历。
目的:研究与不同性取向和性别认同群体相关的护士工作场所欺凌行为:观察性横断面研究:利用 2022 年的年度组织满意度调查,我们确定了护士提供的自由文本评论(N = 25,337 条)。我们在唯一的受访者(n = 1432)中识别了特定欺凌内容的评论,并对其进行了主题分析。我们还研究了捕捉组织结构的封闭式问题,如工作满意度和职业倦怠。我们使用定性和定量数据比较了不同性取向和性别认同群体与大多数群体的差异:对于自由文本评论,主题类别反映了欺凌的类型、施暴者和感知到的影响。不尊重是最常见的主题,而上司是主要实施者。与其他组别相比,不同性别认同和性取向组别护士报告的欺凌主题和工作场所感知有所不同。报告受到欺凌的护士还报告了较高的离职意向、职业倦怠、较低的工作场所文明程度、更多的不满和较低的自我真实性:结论:在护士欺凌研究中,对不同性取向和性别认同群体的研究不足,这可能是由于身份识别方面的敏感性。我们的设计实现了对这些群体的匿名评估。我们建议采取一些做法,以帮助减轻和缓解护理工作中普遍存在的欺凌现象:无患者或公众贡献:我们研究了不同性取向和性别认同群体对护士欺凌的看法与多数群体的差异。在主题定性内容和工作场所体验评分方面都发现了群体差异,少数群体成员报告的工作场所体验较差。护士领导和员工可以从学习最佳实践中受益,以消除这一人群中的欺凌现象:报告方法:STROBE横断面观察研究指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信